General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Lance's Marathon Goal

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 9 posts · 537 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 May 2006
Last activity
25 May 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
537
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well it's the first I've heard of Lance speak to his Marathon
    goals....Armstrong and Paula Radcliffe in NYC today pushing some Nike
    ipod [censored]. "he's been training 45 minutes - 1 hour a day and hopes to
    come within one hour of Radcliffe's finishing time"

    Nice Lance....anything under 3:15 is the goal? Yeah....right. Soft
    media banter no doubt. Give me a break. At the moment I'm guessing
    2:37 +- 3 Min. 7 time champion? Hill killer rep? ....35 or 35 when he
    runs?...I'm expecting an impressive performance.

    http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/05/23/nike_and_apple_1.php

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well it's the first I've heard of Lance speak to his Marathon
    goals....Armstrong and Paula Radcliffe in NYC today pushing some Nike
    ipod [censored]. "he's been training 45 minutes - 1 hour a day and hopes to
    come within one hour of Radcliffe's finishing time"

    Nice Lance....anything under 3:15 is the goal? Yeah....right. Soft
    media banter no doubt. Give me a break. At the moment I'm guessing
    2:37 +- 3 Min. 7 time champion? Hill killer rep? ....35 or 35 when he
    runs?...I'm expecting an impressive performance.

    Hmmm. An [censored] named Lance...who would have figured.

  3. Quoted message said:

    Well it's the first I've heard of Lance speak to his Marathon
    goals....Armstrong and Paula Radcliffe in NYC today pushing some Nike
    ipod [censored]. "he's been training 45 minutes - 1 hour a day and hopes to
    come within one hour of Radcliffe's finishing time"

    Here is some of the text of Lance talking about the NYC marathon on
    Sirius Radio a few weeks ago...

    After the music break the talk turned back to the upcoming marathon
    and what kind of time he thought he could do. This will be his first
    marathon ever and it's generated a lot of buzz in the media. Lance's
    been training somewhat already - 10 mile runs here and there on the
    roads and trails around Austin - and noted that he has a running
    background from his days in triathlon. I reminded him he also has some
    results, coming in third out of a thousand people a couple of years
    ago at the LAF's "Run for the Roses" 5k.

    "I also did Kristin's run recently at the Fertile Hope 5k, and had a
    decent time," he said. "So I'd be ecstatic to break three hours at the
    New York City Marathon." Me having almost no knowledge about running
    showed my ignorance and lack of quick math skills and asked if that
    was a good time. "Three hours is a 7-minute mile pace - I think that's
    hard - I mean a 7-minute mile isn't that hard, but to do it 26 times -
    that's hard, especially at the end." And now I know…

    I have done a little running recently so I can hang with some friends
    and noted that - differentiating from cycling - it requires a totally
    different muscle group. "That's why I'm kind of paying the price right
    now, I'm trying to adapt to running. Just the jarring - it's so hilly
    here in Austin, running uphill is hard, but running downhill is hard
    on you. So if you're going up and down and up and down, your quads are
    just killing you."

    The other big deal about the marathon is that it's also at the same
    time as Lance's 10-year cancer diagnosis anniversary. "The marathon
    for me is an interesting idea, because you take a 35-year old guy who
    used to be a pro athlete, he retires, and some think he'd want to do
    nothing after. But that's not what the rest of the world does. They're
    at that age and they want to be a weekend warrior - run, ride your
    bike, etc - do something to try and stay fit. So I get to be one of
    those guys. And then to get to tie it into my 10-year cancer
    anniversary, that's a really cool connection." Can he win? "I am not
    going there to try and win anything! Breaking three hours would be
    huge, and if I can get near 2:45 I'll come out of my skin." Higgs says
    a sub 2:45 is his prediction, Lance said he better know some short
    cuts if that's what he wants him to do…

    --
    Phil M.

  4. Lance is BS'ing _everybody_ and really putting it on thick. Read a
    book by a guy named Coyle called, "Lance Armstrong's War". The guy
    who wrote the book said, "he's a good hero for my 10 yr old son, at a
    safe distance......but I would not want him to date my daughter".
    Lance is a ruthless SOB and I would not be surprised if he went sub
    2:30 in NYC.

    In this book I referenced...there's a fellow cyclist/race named Floyd
    Landis, teammate of Lance, .... he said in the book, "Lance doesn't
    want to be hugged, he wants to kick everybody's ass." hummmm?

    It would not be far-fetched for him to have personal moments wherein he
    contemplated how he could possibly win the Marathon. Of course he
    won't but in his mind I don't think he's 100% ruled it out.

  5. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well it's the first I've heard of Lance speak to his Marathon
    goals....Armstrong and Paula Radcliffe in NYC today pushing some Nike
    ipod [censored]. "he's been training 45 minutes - 1 hour a day and hopes to
    come within one hour of Radcliffe's finishing time"

    Nice Lance....anything under 3:15 is the goal? Yeah....right. Soft
    media banter no doubt. Give me a break. At the moment I'm guessing
    2:37 +- 3 Min. 7 time champion? Hill killer rep? ....35 or 35 when he
    runs?...I'm expecting an impressive performance.

    http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/05/23/nike_and_apple_1.php

    Small article about Armstrong in the paper today. He said in addition to the
    marathon, he would be willing to do an adventure race and maybe a triathlon,
    but nothing "with a set goal or any pressure". I think he's not going to go
    for broke in the marathon; I predict a 2:49 at NYCM for him.

    -Tony

  6. Quoted message said:

    Lance is BS'ing _everybody_ and really putting it on thick.

    Could be. Including his pretended "45'-60'/day training" too then, cos if
    he isn't doing any long runs at all, qignificantly better than 3h _is_
    still not easy, whatever his potential.

    For comparison, Laurent Jalabert did 2h55m at NYCM and 2h57 in London
    (with a major positive split there - see Anders' reply to you on the
    subject in a previous thread).

  7. "Tony S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:WR0dg.5995$oa3.951@trnddc08...

    Quoted message said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well it's the first I've heard of Lance speak to his Marathon
    goals....Armstrong and Paula Radcliffe in NYC today pushing some Nike
    ipod [censored]. "he's been training 45 minutes - 1 hour a day and hopes to
    come within one hour of Radcliffe's finishing time"

    Nice Lance....anything under 3:15 is the goal? Yeah....right. Soft
    media banter no doubt. Give me a break. At the moment I'm guessing
    2:37 +- 3 Min. 7 time champion? Hill killer rep? ....35 or 35 when he
    runs?...I'm expecting an impressive performance.

    http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/05/23/nike_and_apple_1.php

    Small article about Armstrong in the paper today. He said in addition to the
    marathon, he would be willing to do an adventure race and maybe a triathlon,
    but nothing "with a set goal or any pressure". I think he's not going to go
    for broke in the marathon; I predict a 2:49 at NYCM for him.

    -Tony

    Prediction: Armstrong goes sub 2:40, or he gets injured training,
    probably the latter.

  8. Quoted message said:

    http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/05/23/nike_and_apple_1.php

    Lance, sorry I didn't follow your link. The Nike & iPod gizmo I posted
    about today was mentioned in the article.

  9. Well he said in context to this marathon choice....

    "It fills the void in terms of giving a schedule to my day. And it
    gives me an outlet to go out and exercise and suffer the stuff that I
    did for twenty years. But competitively, I've been around the races,
    I've watched the races, and...I'm thirty five years old, so I'm also
    realistic and know that I can't do this for ever": - Lance Armstrong,
    Seven-time Tour de France winner.

    He's speaking in a context as if age 35 the "sun is setting" on him so
    it's now or never. This is only true if the objective is to compete
    are your personal highest level and produce a peak performance in the
    context of a lifetime. He clearly views this challenge for himself
    through the lens of a top tier comptetitor who intends to give a
    maximum effort. Tony, he's going balls to the walls....he has no other
    gear. I'm thinking 2:35-2:40.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.