Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Less is more?

Started by Campag_nut · · Last activity · 8 posts · 680 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
16 March 2007
Last activity
19 March 2007
Original author
Campag_nut
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
680
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Campag have differential braking to prevent back wheel locking (bicycle
    ABS?). Is this truly good technology or is it a scam - dressing up "less"
    as safer?

    Has anyone used this type of brake that can give me a review? My past
    experience with small brakes (Aero Gran Compe in the 80's) was not good.
    Certainly they saved weight but they had zero stopping power at the rear.

    Thanks.

  2. Campag_nut said:

    Campag have differential braking to prevent back wheel locking (bicycle
    ABS?). Is this truly good technology or is it a scam - dressing up "less"
    as safer?

    It's just a weaker brake, locking the back wheel isn't very unsafe,
    and if you're good with your brakes you wouldn't hit the back one as hard
    anyway. The only real benefit is that it's a bit lighter (but probably more
    prone to breaking).

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael Warner said:
    Campag_nut said:

    Campag have differential braking to prevent back wheel locking (bicycle
    ABS?). Is this truly good technology or is it a scam - dressing up "less"
    as safer?

    It's just a weaker brake, locking the back wheel isn't very unsafe,
    and if you're good with your brakes you wouldn't hit the back one as hard
    anyway. The only real benefit is that it's a bit lighter (but probably more
    prone to breaking).

    Good riders use front brakes except for special road conditions. And the
    rear brake is plenty for stopping power, any more would just induce
    wheel lock up, so what's the point.

    In any case, Campag nor any reputable brands aren't known for being
    prone to breaking. They are well engineered and constructed.
    --

  4. majority of your weight is or goes forwards as you brake, hence less power needed at back. Campy went from single pivot brakes, to dual-pivot brakes and then back again mainly to save weight and the above.

  5. Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael Warner said:
    Campag_nut said:

    Campag have differential braking to prevent back wheel locking (bicycle
    ABS?). Is this truly good technology or is it a scam - dressing up "less"
    as safer?

    It's just a weaker brake, locking the back wheel isn't very unsafe,
    and if you're good with your brakes you wouldn't hit the back one as hard
    anyway. The only real benefit is that it's a bit lighter (but probably more
    prone to breaking).

    Good riders use front brakes except for special road conditions. And the
    rear brake is plenty for stopping power, any more would just induce
    wheel lock up, so what's the point.

    In any case, Campag nor any reputable brands aren't known for being
    prone to breaking. They are well engineered and constructed.
    --

    *cough* steel whisker-thin cranks *cough* shimano QR *cough* cervalo R.2
    carbon frames *cough* 1970s Phil Wood disk brakes *cough*

    All either recalled or know to brake sudenly and without warning

    Cheers

    Joel

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Joel Mayes said:
    Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Michael Warner said:

    On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:52:29 GMT, Campag_nut wrote:

    > Campag have differential braking to prevent back wheel locking (bicycle
    > ABS?). Is this truly good technology or is it a scam - dressing up
    > "less"
    > as safer?

    It's just a weaker brake, locking the back wheel isn't very unsafe,
    and if you're good with your brakes you wouldn't hit the back one as hard
    anyway. The only real benefit is that it's a bit lighter (but probably
    more
    prone to breaking).

    Good riders use front brakes except for special road conditions. And the
    rear brake is plenty for stopping power, any more would just induce
    wheel lock up, so what's the point.

    In any case, Campag nor any reputable brands aren't known for being
    prone to breaking. They are well engineered and constructed.
    --

    *cough* steel whisker-thin cranks *cough* shimano QR *cough* cervalo R.2
    carbon frames *cough* 1970s Phil Wood disk brakes *cough*

    All either recalled or know to brake sudenly and without warning

    There are selected cases where things break. But current single pivot
    rear Campag brakes aren't know for breaking. The earlier comment "The
    only real benefit is that it's a bit lighter (but probably more prone to
    breaking)" has no factual basis.
    --

  7. Joel Mayes said:

    *cough* steel whisker-thin cranks *cough* shimano QR
    *cough* cervalo R.2 carbon frames *cough* 1970s Phil Wood disk
    brakes *cough*

    That's a nasty cough you have there. Something's been going around.
    Maybe you should see a doctor. Then again, the doctor will just say
    drink plenty of water and have some rest. So maybe you should drink
    plenty of water and have some rest.

  8. "flyingdutch" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    majority of your weight is or goes forwards as you brake, hence less
    power needed at back. Campy went from single pivot brakes, to
    dual-pivot brakes and then back again mainly to save weight and the
    above.

    --
    flyingdutch

    Exactly - these "technological advances" are merely fashion dressed up as
    science!

    Time for me to bolt the old 80's brakes on again then...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.