What is more important, weight or aerodynamics
especially in terms of rolling resistance, ie wheels, etc
especially in terms of rolling resistance, ie wheels, etc
Well, depends on what sort of riding you do.originalolol said:What is more important, weight or aerodynamics
especially in terms of rolling resistance, ie wheels, etc
If you check analyticcycling.com, aero beats out weight (for wheels) almost all the time, including most uphill TTs. But since the aero benefits are proportional to speed (i.e. the faster you ride, the greater the benefit) the studies are aimed at racing cyclists, and to get real aero benefit, you need pretty deep rims (Zipp data shows that you do not get aero benefits until the rims are at least 40mm deep, at which point you're talking carbon fiber). Also, the aero benefits are greatest when you're "in the wind" i.e. at the front of the paceline or solo, less when you're drafting. So a lot of the answer has to do with your intended purpose for the wheels. You don't really get involved with aero frames unless you're looking at TT bikes, some triathalon rigs, or Cervelo's Soloist Carbon; these are all pretty specialized equipment.originalolol said:What is more important, weight or aerodynamics
especially in terms of rolling resistance, ie wheels, etc
Eastway82 said:For most of us, weight is important, but only up to a point. If your bike's under 9-10Kg then it's probably more important to lose some weight off your butt than your bottom bracket.
originalolol said:Can anyone compare normal & flat spokes, and those wheels with only 3 huge spokes?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.