Steven M. Scharf said:Are the non-certified lamps sold at all? Are these sorts of certification
requirements ever enforced by police (or anyone).
Yes, and generally no. But there has been at least one finding of
contributory negligence against a cyclist who was hit from behind when
using a flashing LED, even though research shows that flashing lights
are between three and five times more visible.
This is due to the influence of the species Mustela Litigensis, a
common urban pest which has proved surprisingly hard to eradicate.
Quoted message said:Technically, in most of the U.S. red flashers are illegal, including where I
live, in California, but they are widely sold and widely used and I've never
heard of any enforcement action.
It is much more likely that this sort of thing will come up in
personal injury cases, since the small number of police (here anyway)
who actually know the law, are generally smart enough to realise that
it is stupid.
Quoted message said:Interestingly, in the California vehicle code there is an explicit
prohibition on flashing blue lights for bicycles, and flashing red lights
for all vehicles. Why would the vehicle code explicitly state the
prohibition on flashing blue lights for bicycles, without mentioning the
flashing red lights?
Because they areprohibited for all vehicles, is my guess. You haven't
forgotten that a bike is a vehicle, have you? ;-)
Quoted message said:Flashing amber is permitted when a hazard exists, though they don't
explicitly state what these hazards are. Technically, I should have a solid
red light and a flashing amber light on my bicycle, but I don't have the
solid red.
Read it carefully. Here you can identify hazards with flashing
/orange/ beacons, but flashing /red/ is reserved for emergency
vehicles.
Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University