General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Lost at Night

Started by C L Imber · · Last activity · 281 posts · 10,609 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
15 January 2004
Last activity
16 January 2004
Original author
C L Imber
Posts
281
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
10,609
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 281
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. W. D. Grey said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    he BMC and MTT are concerned that reliance on a GPS as a primary navigational tool will result in
    over reliance and detract people's sill in using a map and compass, which they consider to be more
    "rugged". They can see the benefits of a GPS as a navigational aid.

    Maybe they are not correct in their views - but I'm not qualified to contradict what they say.

    OK. So that is the basis on which you commenced your navigation exercise.

    No.

    Quoted message said:

    You said you learned a lot - a steep learning curve etc. I'm sorry but I think you learned nothing!
    You were very lucky.

    Do you want a list of things I learned?

    #1 Night navigation is not something to be undertaken lightly 2 Never attempt a night nav without
    #the correct equipment 3 Always nav to an identifiable feature 4 Don't assume that you have found a
    #spot height unless the point is
    clearly identifiable - e.g. a trig point
    #5 If lost, keep group morale high 6 If it is safe to do so, keep moving 7 It takes many more
    #paces in poor conditions to cover 100m 8 Movement over the ground in poor visibility is far
    #slower than in
    good visibility
    #9 Never plan a night nav with inexperienced or young people 10 Keep a clear head and think
    #logically 11 Don't give up and lie down to wait for help - unless there is
    nothing left to try

    Quoted message said:

    You frequently refer to not knowing where you were or you thought you were somewhere (but were
    not). As this was an exercise wouldn't it have been prudent to use GPS as back up if only to
    provide a position in the emergency situation of being lost in dire circumstances, then you could
    start your navigation from a known position. You were simply compounding a gross error by
    continuing blindly so it seems. In any event if you had used a GPS tucked away in the top of your
    ruck sack, the recorded track would have been very useful for you to compare your meanderings with
    the track you should have navigated. Then you would have learned something.

    At the time I wished I had my GPS. Looking back from the safety of my own home, I am glad I did not.
    If the moment we decided we were lost I'd got out my GPS we'd have been back at camp within 20
    minutes. Had that happened, I don't think that I'd have fully appreciated the difficulties and
    dangers of a night nav.

    Also, once were decided we were lost, we worked out a plan to get to an identifiable point. The plan
    worked and we extracted ourselves from a potentially uncomfortable situation. That plan would not
    have been carried out in practice had we used a GPS.

    Quoted message said:

    You are right in what you say, the "experts" such as National Park rangers (an others) who give
    lectures in navigation definitely frown upon the use of GPS. An example - one trainee ranger who
    had been on a nav. course positively cringed when I asked if she had used GPS. She said they were
    NOT allowed.

    For goodness sake, it IS a valuable aid and one which you would have done well to employ, not only
    to obtain a correct position but for the track record for future use in de-briefing sessions.

    Of course a GPS is a valuable aid. But it is not the tool to use when learning to use a map and
    compass in a night nav.

    Quoted message said:

    So you see Phill was not as stupid as you make out.

    Phil is an ass. He leaps to judgements of the competence or otherwise without direct experience of
    the particular situation.

    I certainly do have criticisms of the instructor - but I keep those to myself, and one of those
    criticisms is not the failure to own or have a GPS.

  2. Paul Saunders said:
    C L Imber said:

    The Mountain Training Trust (MTT) recommend the following equipment for walking in the British
    mountains in summer conditions:


    <snip list>

    <List put back in>

    Personal kit
    - rucksack
    - emergency bivouac bag
    - waterproof jacket
    - over trousers
    - map
    - compass
    - torch plus spare battery plus spare bulb
    - walking boots
    - drink
    - lunch
    - whistle
    - hat
    - gloves
    - spare gloves
    - spare fleece or similar warm layer
    - spare food
    - personal first aid
    - sanitary supplies

    Extra equipment for the group leader
    - first aid kit
    - group shelter
    - spare map (1:50,000)
    - spare compass
    - spare fleece or similar warm layer
    - penknife
    - spare hat
    - spare gloves
    - spare socks
    - spare food
    - warm drink or food
    - rope
    - small repair kit

    Quoted message said:

    And you expect me to carry that lot up to the top of Pen y Fan in the middle of an August heatwave?

    I guess you could leave some of the items out - especially the extra spare fleeces and other items
    of personal kit.

    Quoted message said:

    Don't get me wrong, it's undoubtedly a very sensible list, but I've done the whole "carrying half a
    ton of kit just in case" scenario and it's often overkill. That list of kit would help me survive
    in the middle of winter! :-)

    And what about the survival of the group for which you are responsible?

    Quoted message said:

    Far better to choose your kit based on current (and forseeable) weather conditions, but I can
    understand the logic of "erring on the side of caution". Wouldn't want to recommend walking in
    shorts, t-shirt and trainers with a couple of bars of chocolate now would they? Yet there are times
    when it's perfectly safe to do exactly that, although as a disclaimer, maybe you need 20 years of
    hillwalking experience first before you become capable of making that judgement... ;-)

    It may well be safe for you to walk in shorts, t-shirt, trainers and a couple of bars of choc, but
    what about your group?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not even a whiff of a GPS or mobile phone.

    So because the traditionalists are obstinately stuck in their luddite ways, you take that as proof
    that those items are unnecessary?

    No. They make no mention of carrying a wrist watch, yet I usually wear mine.

    Quoted message said:

    Or even worse, do you assume that the lack of inclusion of those items in the list actually implies
    that you *shouldn't* take them with you?

    Oh no! I nearly always have my GPS with me. I didn't on this occasion because it was attached to my
    rucksack which was in my tent. I thought about bringing it, but decided not to because the purpose
    of the exercise was to navigate at night using a map and compass.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The BMC and MTT are concerned that reliance on a GPS as a primary navigational tool will result
    in over reliance and detract people's sill in using a map and compass,

    I'm concerned that their traditionalist views are way out of date and that they fail to fully
    recognise the benefits of modern navigational technology, and are unwilling to adapt to them.
    Strange that GPS is now commonplace and accepted in aircraft and naval navigation throughout the
    modern world, yet in the backward world of walking it's still treated with suspicion and contempt.

    I think you overstate the case.

    The MTT have the following to say about GPSs:

    "As with all navigational aids, GPS should be regarded as one of the many tools for gathering the
    necessary information. It should be remembers that the compass is rugged and will work with
    virtually no maintenance in any conditions, whereas reliance solely on GPS could all too easily let
    the navigator down.

    Quoted message said:

    But hang on a moment, did you say; "people's skill in using a map and compass"?

    Which people are you talking about exactly? Experienced hillwalkers? Or tourists?

    The fact is, like it or not, that many of the people that walk up mountains on hot, sunny days are
    not experienced hillwalkers. Most of them are Johnny Townie and his girlfriend who thought it might
    be fun to go out and walk up that interesting looking hill wearing just t-shirt, shorts and
    trainers. They don't have spare fleeces, waterproofs, emergency rations and survival bags in their
    rucksacks. They don't even have rucksacks! Map and compass? Gimme a break! The nearest thing
    they've got to a map is the AA road atlas that they left in the car and even if they had a compass
    all they'd be able to deduce from it is which way north is, which in itself isn't a lot of use.

    No, the standard navigation technique used by Johnnie Townie is to park next to all those other
    cars and follow all those other people walking up that path up the hill. After all, everyone else
    must know the way, right? So they couldn't possibly get lost, could they?

    Okay, a little bit of humour there, but you know what they say about true words and jest...

    We were not Johnnie Townie and his girlfriend. We were a group of fairly experienced hillwalkers
    learning to navigate at night by map and compass with an experienced and qualified instructor.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    They can see the benefits of a GPS as a navigational aid.

    If they can see the benefits, why don't they act on them?

    How do you expect them to act? Should the BMC insist that all instructors buy a GPS and learn how
    to use them?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Maybe they are not correct in their views - but I'm not qualified to contradict what they say.

    You don't have to be "qualified" to be able to tell that three navigational devices are better than
    two. That's just plain common sense.

    Not when the objective is to navigate without using a GPS.

  3. In [email hidden]
    C L Imber mused:

    Quoted message said:


    I was on a Mountain Leader Training Course last week.

    Good for you.

    <snip>

    I've read the dialogue, followed it on the map best as possible, and here's my assessment :-J

    Somebody must've screwed up their navigation 'leg' pretty bad, and the others probably weren't doing
    their own checks.

    IMO the instructor knew where you were (each instructor tends to have their own 'personal
    playground' and know it very well) and was giving as much leeway as possible so that the course
    members could recover the situation on their own (which you did). Everyone survived, and hopefully
    learnt lots.

    (How waterproof are GPS's? Would one have survived a ducking in the stream as described?)

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    At the time I wished I had my GPS. Looking back from the safety of my own home, I am glad I did
    not. If the moment we decided we were lost I'd got out my GPS we'd have been back at camp within 20
    minutes. Had that happened, I don't think that I'd have fully appreciated the difficulties and
    dangers of a night nav.

    If you consider you argument her, if a person goes sky diving exercise, then let him do so without a
    parachute so that he can fully appreciate the dangers of hitting the ground at high speed !

    Quoted message said:


    Also, once were decided we were lost, we worked out a plan to get to an identifiable point. The
    plan worked and we extracted ourselves from a potentially uncomfortable situation. That plan would
    not have been carried out in practice had we used a GPS.

    From your report your plan did not work - you were constantly somewhere other that where you
    thought you should have been.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    You are right in what you say, the "experts" such as National Park rangers (an others) who give
    lectures in navigation definitely frown upon the use of GPS. An example - one trainee ranger who
    had been on a nav. course positively cringed when I asked if she had used GPS. She said they were
    NOT allowed.

    For goodness sake, it IS a valuable aid and one which you would have done well to employ, not only
    to obtain a correct position but for the track record for future use in de-briefing sessions.

    Of course a GPS is a valuable aid. But it is not the tool to use when learning to use a map and
    compass in a night nav.

    I never said that you should have used the GPS as a primary navigational aid on such an exercise,
    but it could have been used in the situation you found youreslf - in your words LOST - then to get a
    fix and then carry on with your map and compass exercise.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  5. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From your report your plan did not work - you were constantly somewhere other that where you
    thought you should have been.

    Until we found out where we were, by following a plan.

    Some plan Hmm!
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  6. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A GPS weighs next to nothing. I personaly can't beleive your instructor wasn't carrying one. In
    this case you were lucky. Ot could of made all the dfference. Please give the name of the company
    who runs the course, so I can avoid them ;-)

    No. It was an excellent course, and I learnt a great deal.

    Come off it Cliff! You learned a lot about farting around in the dark - something a GPS would have
    minimised or totally alleviated.

    BTW you say that GPS and Mobile phone are verboten!

    So it's all right to carry a whistle to call for help in an emergency but NOT a phone. I know you
    will always get the odd prat who will call MRT on his phone for some insignificant reason, but you
    must consider the genuine times a phone could really save lives.

    When this thread had died I shall visit uk.rec.sub-aqua to read the article by Dave Iver on the
    unnecessary use of depth gauges
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  7. In article <[email hidden]>, Paul Saunders <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    C L Imber said:

    I was beginning to think that either I, or everyone else in this group, had completely the wrong
    idea of the purpose of the ML award and how people learn.

    No, not really. I was just surprised that no-one had a GPS as an emergency back up, especially
    since this was an exercise. Learning is all very well, but sometimes things can go wrong, and when
    they do, having such a powerful device at your disposal is not to be sniffed at, particularly if
    you need to provide a precise grid ref for a casualty.

    It seems to me that not even taking a GPS (the leader) indicates a stubborn belief in the myth that
    map and compass are all powerful and a GPS is therefore unnecessary.

    I didn't carry my GPS receiver on my ML assessment. I frankly didn't feel the need to - even as an
    emergency back up. I did carry my altimeter but did not use it as the navigation elements were not
    really about navigation but about demonstration of map and compass skills. The altimeter did
    stimulate discussion in the group and I did take my GPS out on one day walk to illustrate the topic
    when I was speaking about GPS.

    None of the instructor / assessors I dealt with had the attitude that you refer to above.

    I do wonder sometimes if my conventional navigation skills would be as good if I had started using
    GPS earlier on in my hill going.

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Roger Chapman
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I trust the experience did him good. I have been soaked on Cader more than once without coming to
    any great harm.

    Maybe I was particularly unlucky to have been soaked one January Saturday morning but was able to
    change into dry clothes having been wet through for about an hour.

    Two weeks later after what appeared to be symptoms of something brewing I went down with sub-acute
    rheumatism and was off work for 11 weeks. Was it the soaking and cold which caused the problem or
    something else which was a coincidence.?
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  9. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    BTW you say that GPS and Mobile phone are verboten!

    Where did I say that?


    A long long time ago in the preamble to this long thread YOU MENTIONED the MRT or some other body in
    authority advising against such aids in fact there was not a "Whiff" of them in the list of
    recommended items to be taken on a trip,

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    So it's all right to carry a whistle to call for help in an emergency but NOT a phone. I know you
    will always get the odd prat who will call MRT on his phone for some insignificant reason, but you
    must consider the genuine times a phone could really save lives.

    When this thread had died I shall visit uk.rec.sub-aqua to read the article by Dave Iver on the
    unnecessary use of depth gauges

    Don't you mean Sandy (S W Immer)?

    No - note the use of a depth gauge :-)

    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  10. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    (Chris Street) said:
    Quoted message said:

    If the instructor was suffering hypothermia, what she needed was a warm drink and warm dry
    clothing, not to lie down in a plastic bag in some damp hollow. While the poly sack might keep
    out the wind and rain it would make convection heat loss even worse.

    Quoted message said:

    Please tell me how you get convective heat loss from the top of a closed survival bag.

    From the top by pools of water collecting - but the biggest convective loss is from the bottom.


    You seem to be referring to conductive (the transmission of heat through a substance from a
    region of higher temperature to a region of lower temperature) heat transfer rather than
    convective which is the transference of heat in a gas or liquid by upward movement of the heated
    and less dense medium.

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  11. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    (Chris Street) said:

    not forgetting lady luck.

    People make their own luck.

    Perhaps it was the way you described the events but it sounded rather like you were all a bit
    surprised to find the stream flowing through the wall you had seen earlier in the day (~900m from
    and ~170m below your tents).

    From the description does not seem to have been much of a systematic approach to working out your
    location and it appears the clue of the stream and wall combination was not properly assessed.

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Phil Cook said:
    C L Imber said:

    On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 14:49:01 +0000, "W. D. Grey" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > From your report your plan did not work - you were constantly somewhere other that where you
    > thought you should have been.

    Until we found out where we were, by following a plan.

    It seems to me that you found out where you were by accident. You should noy have had to go that
    far before finding where you were.

    You found a wall and were following it then you found a stream where there shouldn't have been if
    the wall was the one you thought you were following. So in that case you try to match all the
    walls with streams crossing them. You say there were three. But from what I can figure from the
    map they all point in different directions. Did nobody check the directions of the wall, stream
    and slope?

    All three were checked - but with 10m visibility exact direction is hard to ascertain. Contour
    lines are marked at 10m intervals.

    In the locality there are three streams running in approximately the same direction which cross
    walls which run in approximately the same direction.

    I'm not sure which others you mean but the only ones I can see would have entailed a good deal of
    descent and a click or more walking to get to. In such poor conditions that distance and descent
    would undoubtedly have taken you a long time.

    It seems that the assumption that you had recently been at Foel Boethwel ruled out the possibility
    of being near your lake :-(

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  13. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:


    Hillwalking by Steve Long, (2003) is much better.

    Thanks, not seen that before. Steve was the Course Director for my assessment and appeared very
    switched on so I expect that is a good reference text.

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    BTW - I meant conduction not convection, sorry!


    Also I don't think you really meant convention :-)

    No criticism here - typos just happen :-)
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  15. In article <[email hidden]>, AndyP <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    "Chris Street" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>> Have they taken out the 600m minimum height requirement then?
    >>
    >> I haven't seen that figure quoted - 600m might count as a substantial summit in some
    >> mountainous regions - but not in others.

    Quoted message said:

    the 600m figure was quoted by a friend doing the ML course, which was nnoying as his main walking
    ground was the Peaks - mostly below 600m!

    I can remember 600m stated in the ML logbook my girlfriend had about 6 years ago.

    There used to be a column for the number of peaks of 600m or over next to the Camps column. Not
    every one of my recorded "quality mountain days" included 600m peaks. Not all of them were leading
    and many were solo. However I recorded 68 days prior to training/log book exemption and assessment
    so they possibly could have not counted some of my days.

    I got the distinct impression that if your logged days demonstrate a well rounded experience they
    were not overly fussy about the exact criteria. If, as one of the candidates on my assessment, you
    have the bare minimum of logged days they have to all be good days. Although competent on the hill
    he was very close to being deferred to get more experience.

    I see now the MTLE have separate log pages for leading and personal experience which is a good idea.

    mltb.orgmlleadingexp.doc mltb.orgmlpersonalmountainwalking.doc

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  16. Chris Malcolm <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    "AndyP" <[email hidden]> writes:

    surely knowing

    Quoted message said:

    that you only have to press a button to tell you where you are which way to walk following a
    series of predetermined waypoints deadens the spirit of the outdoors experience somewhat.

    Not necessarily. For example some people carefully refrain from reading the user manual of their
    GPSR in order to make using it more exciting. Then when they switch it on on a fogged out summit to
    find the way down they have no way of knowing that they'd left the datum set wrongly for British OS
    and it's giving positions hundreds of yards in error.

    Then there's the exciting signal reflection problems in gullies. And if you want to get completely
    lost while following a GPS waypoint pointer, how about keeping it in a pocket, and stopping to take
    it out and consult the direction arrow?

    The GPSR is a very sophisticated instrument. It's simply ignorance and unfamiliarity that makes
    folk think it takes the excitement of navigation away. There are dozens of really good ways of
    misusing one and getting excitingly baffled and lost. And as a number of Mountain Rescue groups
    have reported, you can also use your GPS in an emergency to send the rescue team to completely the
    wrong place.

    This nonsense about them taking the excitement out of getting lost only happens with education and
    training, and it's not difficult to avoid that, is it? Just keep it in in your backpack until a
    real emergency arises, then you can pull out the GPS and get really excitingly baffled and confused
    whenever trudging nowhere in the cold and wet gets too boring.


    8-)

    I think there is a case for the Instructor of such groups to have a GPS in his/her pack and
    sufficient experience of using one.
    --
    Gordon

  17. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:


    Hillwalking by Steve Long, (2003) is much better.

    Thanks, not seen that before. Steve was the Course Director for my assessment and appeared very
    switched on so I expect that is a good reference text.

    It's superb. The book doesn't talk down to you like Mountaincraft and Leadership does.

    I can't say I have thought that about Langmuir. I bought the then current edition when I registered
    for my ML in 1997, even though I had one from the mid eighties, and did not regret it.

    I will certainly take a look at Steve's offering when I get a chance.

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  18. Sounds like a good experience, handled well. Ignore all the detractors on this group.

    Just one criticism: on the return to 572 from an iffy 631 in such bad visibility, I would have aimed
    off onto Llyn y Biswail. A nice big target which should be easy to find. Then follow it around to
    the wall, and use this as a defined point to go for 572. Of course, I'm typing this from a warm
    office, not a rainy hillside at 2 in the morning!

    C

    "C L Imber" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    To understand the following seqence of events open
    ordnancesurvey.co.ukgetamap in your web browser, click "Get-a-Map" and
    enter the grid reference SH649475.

    ====================

    I was on a Mountain Leader Training Course last week.

    On Tuesday we went out on expedition and an overnight camp in the Moelwyns.

    After setting camp at 5pm we had dinner and at 7pm off we went for a night navigation exercise.

    Our camp was at SH 6494 4752. Rain was heavy and visibility very poor as we were in the cloud.

    I was asked to navigate from the camp to the sheepfold at 6508 4758. I took the group to the head
    of the lake Lynn y Biswail (Lake of [censored]) and then paced on a bearing to where I thought the
    sheepfold should be. I then asked the group to remain at that spot while I paced a box search and
    found the sheepfold (and a f**king big crag) just twenty paces away - that's how bad the
    visibility was!

    Another group member was asked to navigate to the 572m spot height at 6476 4750. We probably
    got there.

    The third group member was asked to navigate from the spot height to Foel Boethwell 6508 4764 (!?)
    the exact summit of which is not clear on the map. There may be a ground survey spot at the GR
    given, but then again there might not be. Whatever, the summit of Foel Bothwell is not immediately
    apparant at night in poor visibility, and, it seems that the bearing we walked on was 10 degrees
    out so we may have been several metres to the east. Also, the party member navigating boxed 30
    paces east to avoid a crag but never boxed those paces back. I suspect that a point that we
    thought was Foel Bothwell was the outcrop at 6516 4758.

    I was then asked to take us back to the 572 spot height at 6476 4750. I took a back bearing from
    what I assumed was the Summit of Foel Bothwell 6514 4774. The visibility was so poor that the only
    way to navigate was to send another group member ahead, ask them to move left or right so they'd
    be standing on the bearing and walk to them, then repeat the process. En route we heard a shout
    from our camp by the instructor's sister. Our instructor shouted back that we were OK - however,
    on reflection, the shout seemed to come from the wrong side of our supposed position.

    I wasn't able to find the 572 spot height, so the instructor asked me to pace onward and find the
    wall which runs northwest from the lake, just south of the spot height. I couldn't find the wall.

    We then backtracked to try to find the summit of Foel Bothwell again - and were still unable to
    find the summit. We were, perhaps, on the crags at the 631 spot height 6534 4736.

    Once again we tried to find the 572 spot height - our last known position, and once again we
    counldn't find it. So we tried once again to find the wall which runs west from the lake, and once
    again we couldn't find it.

    We were lost, the time was 10pm and we'd been out in the minging rain and mist for three hours.
    All of us, except the instructor, had left our packs at the camp. I had a double survival bag in
    my pocket, some snacks, a water bottle, spare batteries and an emergency LED torch. The two other
    trainees had similar equipment but no survival bag. The instructor was rather better equipped with
    a rope and survival bag but no group shelter.

    We tried to backtrack to Foel Bothwell, but it was hopeless. We were lost.

    I said to the instructor that we should assume we were in the region of Foel Bothwell and head due
    west so we would "fall into" one of two walls which form a V, meeting at 6454 4774, and depending
    on the direction of the wall we could follow the wall to 6454 4774 and confirm our position as the
    cross in the walls are clearly offset, not quite making an X. From there we could navigate back to
    the lake and our camp.

    The instructor said that she would be happier walking in a north westerly direction, so that if we
    missed the wall we would run into Llyn LLagi. I was happy with that plan.

    Off we went. We ran into a wall running in a NW direction, so we followed it. Then we came across
    a swolen stream. This was a surprise. No stream crosses the wall we guessed we were following.

    Where do streams come from? Springs or lakes. Where do they flow to? Other streams or rivers,
    lakes or the sea. Given the possibility of the stream dividing if we followed it up stream, and
    that we were probably not on the wall we thought we must be on, we decided to follow it downstream
    - we toyed with the idea of the stream being unmapped, and that it was a temporary one due to the
    heavy rain; we thought that unlikely as it was such a large stream. But we weren't about to jump
    to any conclusions until we had a definate fix on our position. The ground was rocky and broken.
    Going was tough. Passing a crag our instructor put her hand in some gorse. The message was passed
    back to me to be careful - I was at the rear the instructor in front. I was so careful not to put
    my hand into the gorse that I didn't pay attention to my footing. I lost my grip, slipped down the
    crag, regained my grip, then lost it again and ended up sitting up to my chest in the stream!

    It was cold, still raining, I was soaked, visibility was very poor, it was 1am and we were
    hopelessly lost. We'd been out for 6 hours. Yet, our moral was still high. Secretly I was loving
    the experience. I'm quite used to twelve hour-plus walks and knew that I could walk until daylight
    if necessary. I'm out for a weekend in the hills every fortnight and spend two full weeks per year
    in Scotland bagging Munros and Corbetts. Kerry, a fellow candidate has had less experience, but
    was very competent. She has her gold Duke of Edinburgh Award and was a member of her univerersity
    mountaineering club. Paul, Kerry's boyfriend was even less experienced but still very competent.
    The instructor, I felt, should look after herself, although I was still concerned about her. She
    couldn't hold a compass to the map, and relied on me to help her.

    Paul heard my expletive as I fell in the water, but I didn't tell the instructor that I had fallen
    in until much later. I was concerned about morale. I was initally very concerned about my tumble,
    but as soon as my body had heated the water on my trousers, under my over trousers, I felt warm
    enough and happy enough - and I was enjoying the whole experience.

    I haven't mentioned much about clothing, and now's as good a time as any - now that I'm cold and
    wet, to say what I was wearing.

    On the way to the start point in the minibus I was wearing cotton undersocks and cotton
    underpants, a Hagloffs tee shirt, a Berghaus zip neck sweater, Craghoppers trousers, thick acrilic
    walking socks and (fortunately) my Scarpa Manta walking boots as my other boots were still damp
    from the day before. In my pack I had my Sprayway Windbloc fleece, my Sprayway Gortex - reproofed
    6 months ago after a soaking I received on High Street, new gaiters, over trousers, ski gloves and
    fleece gloves with leather grip and a fleece baseball type hat with fold down ears and neck. I
    also had a sealed freezer bag containing dry cloting: a Lowe Alpine t-shirt, Hagloffs pants,
    cotton socks and a Craghoppers zip neck sweater.

    In the morning, soon after we set off it started to rain and I took off my sweater and donned my
    Sprayway Gortex, gaiters and over trousers.

    We pitched our tents in the rain, and, inevitably, the insides got wet. My freezer pack of clothes
    remained sealed but I put on my Berghaus sweater and winter fleece, and changed my gloves - the
    others were soaking. We cooked in the rain. For the night navigation I remained similarly clad
    (base layer, two mid layers, and a shell layer). Our instructor was unwilling to take us out as
    the visibility was so poor, offering us a 5am navigation instead. That was Kerry and Paul's
    preferred option, but I said that they were just being lazy, and putting off the inevitable. And
    so I convinced our instructor to take us out.

    She said that we'd need our packs, but I didn't like the idea of taking my 95L pack out of my
    tent, getting it wet again, and putting it back in my tent after the walk so I protested. She
    insisted that one of us must have a survival bag so I said that I'd put it in my pocket. I also
    took my spare batteries and emergency LED head torch.

    As I didn't have my pack I was well clothed. A good base layer, a fleece sweater, a bindbloc
    fleece, and a recently re-proofed gortex, poor quality trousers, reasonable over trousers, gaiters
    and excellent boots; my pants and socks were cotton, but I wasn't over concerned about that - and
    besides, I like to keep my testicles cool!!! So even though I had fallen in a swollen mountain
    stream I was warm. I still cannot recall if I was wearing my gloves or not. I know that I wasn't
    wearing my fleece gloves with leather palms as they were hanging from the roof of my tent dripping
    onto my sleeping mat (my sleeping bag was still inside two freezer bags to keep it dry). I think
    that I'd decided not to wear my dry ski gloves as I wouldn't be able to handle a map a compass
    very well if I was wearing them. But I don't remeber my hands ever feeling cold - so maybe I was
    wearing them.

    We continued scrambling down the stream in the rain and mist, then, at about 01:30 we found an
    unmistakable feature. The stream flowed through a gap in a wall at 6404 4724. The feature was
    unmistakable because we'd passed it in daylight on our way up to the camp. All we had to do was
    follow the stream back up to "our" lake and find the campsite.

    By 3am I was tucked up in my sleeping bag and hearing the furious exchanges between our instructor
    and her sister, who'd remained at the camp the whole time. The night was not entirely comfortable
    - but it was certainly better than being stuck out in the open.

    The following morning we packed up and went for a post-mortem walk.

    The sheepfolds next to the f**king great crags were obvious. The 572 spot height was less clear.
    The summit of Foel Bothwell was not a distinct point, and on out thrid attempt the previous night
    we may well have been on the 631 spot height but we thought that we were on the crags to the north
    west of Foel Bothwell. The boundary running northwest from the Lake was a well defined wall. We
    thought it must have been removed! A minor stream that we crossed flowing northwest led straight
    into our lake, but we thought that it must be one that was a tributary to a larger stream that
    flowed into Llyn Llagi. After we found the wall running north west, and met the stream flowing
    west, had we gone up stream we'd have come to our lake.

    So, until the moment we decided to walk north west to meet a wall, we were never more than 100m
    from our lake. The problem was that we thought that we were to the north wast of our lake, but we
    were, in fact, to the south east.

    On Friday I had my course de-brief. The course director was full of praise about my night
    navigation, and said that the experience I had would stand me in good stead when I take the
    Mountain Leader assessment next October. He said that the fact that I was part of a group which
    got lost was an important experience, and that my input to recover the situation and my part in
    assisting the instructor to lead the party to safety was a valuable lesson. Being able to keep a
    clear head, and look for strategies to find an identifiable point from which to navigate is
    essential if I am to take groups of young people into the mountains of the British Isles.

    The Mountain Leadership assessment is about crisis management, and the ability to deal with
    potentially dangerous situations. We were taught to cross rivers safely, not because we should
    ever lead a party across a river, but because we may have to in an emergency. We were taught to
    tie a person to a rope and belay them down a crag, not because it's what we would expect to do,
    but what we might have to do in exceptional circumstances. We went on a night navigation
    exercise, not because we'd ever lead a group on a night walk, but because if the [censored] hit the fan
    and the fan didn't like it, that is what we might have to do. We were taught to make a stretcher
    from a survival bag and rocks, not because we should expect to have to do it, but because we
    might have to.

    I loved the whole week and the challenges it posed.

    The next stage to to take a two day first aid course which covers hyperthermia; have 40 "quality
    mountain days" logged, including 8 nights camping - four of which must be wild camps - and then
    take the assessment next October.

  19. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Just one criticism: on the return to 572 from an iffy 631 in such bad visibility, I would have
    aimed off onto Llyn y Biswail. A nice big target which should be easy to find. Then follow it
    around to the wall, and use this as a defined point to go for 572. Of course, I'm typing this from
    a warm office, not a rainy hillside at 2 in the morning!

    Absolutely right. The reason for not doing that was that we'd have passed straight through
    our camp.

    Come off it you're full of contradictions - I quote:

    "I wasn't able to find the 572 spot height, so the instructor asked me to pace onward and find the
    wall which runs northwest from the lake, just south of the spot height. I couldn't find the
    wall....."

    Not much use eh?

    "We then backtracked to try to find the summit of Foel Bothwell again - and were still unable to
    find the summit. We were, perhaps, on the crags at the 631 spot height 6534 4736........"

    You never could tell !

    "Once again we tried to find the 572 spot height - our last known position, and once again we
    counldn't find it. So we tried once again to find the wall which runs west from the lake, and once
    again we couldn't find it."

    You were damn good at not knowing where you were - part of your overall strategy perhaps?

    You didn't find 572 so how could you possibly know that a particular route would have taken you
    anywhere in particular - seeing as you were lost and didn't know where you were.

    When you say - Absolutely right the reason for doing that...... - is a load of codswallop. You
    couldn't have made conscious decision to go to Llyn-y-Biswail as you were already in the [censored]! (pun
    intended) seeing as you didn't even know where it was!

    This pathetic post has taken up too much time. next time you go out may your good luck continue.

    All the above would never need have been quoted for the simple expedient of taking one GPS fix!
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  20. In article <[email hidden]>, C L Imber
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I see you snip this: "En route we heard a shout from our camp by the instructor's sister. Our
    instructor shouted back that we were OK."


    I also snipped the bit where you mentioned that the shout "seemed" to come from somewhere on the
    other side of your "supposed" position.

    You'll note the two words in parenthesis which indicate a modicum of indecision and uncertainty,
    displaying considerable confusion.
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.