please sign up to http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/banfootball/, after all they are all over-paid, over indulged, namby pambies. It isn't even as if they are very good at the game. Their fans are usually causing trouble, and do not bring the country or themselves any benefit.
The whole sport is a waste of money and effort that could be better used in other sporting activities, that demonstrate better role models, and codes of practise that football.
The remarkable thing about my mother is that for 30 years she served us nothing but leftovers. The original meal has never been found. -- Calvin Trillin
"Knight Of The Road" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Peter Hucker" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:
The time limit for signing up is today. Er..... DOH!
I wasn't sufficiently interested to look. Do people really think that any of these uk.gov petitions are listened to?
There was one petition complaining about a super-mosque. Anyone who signed up to it got a snotty email claiming to be from Downing Street calling them a racist.
"Knight Of The Road" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Manky Badger" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:
There was one petition complaining about a super-mosque. Anyone who signed up to it got a snotty email claiming to be from Downing > Street calling them a racist.
No, they were sent an email explaining that the super-mosque story was a hoax.
I was sent an email tellin me that the prime miister thought the whole thing was racist.
Which proves? There is a reason that hearsay is not allowed in courts, it's not reliable! However I did read the petition, and IMHO it was racist, it was also based on a false premise. The originator of the petition also if I remember correctly had links with the BNP.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Google is your friend.
?
A phrase which means you can find things with Google
Jill Barham maybe a good place to start searching.
"Knight Of The Road" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Manky Badger" <[email hidden]> wrote
> There was one petition complaining about a super-mosque. > Anyone who signed up to it got a snotty email claiming to be from Downing > > Street calling them a racist.
No, they were sent an email explaining that the super-mosque story was a hoax.
I was sent an email tellin me that the prime miister thought the whole thing was racist.
Which proves? There is a reason that hearsay is not allowed in courts, it's not reliable! However I did read the petition, and IMHO it was racist, it was also based on a false premise. The originator of the petition also if I remember correctly had links with the BNP.
The BNP is a perfectly valid party and has more sensible policies than the rest of them.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Google is your friend.
?
A phrase which means you can find things with Google
Jill Barham maybe a good place to start searching.
Today's woman puts on wigs, fake eyelashes, false fingernails, sixteen pounds of assorted make-up/shadows/blushes/creams, living bras, various pads that would make a linebacker envious, has implants and assorted other surgeries, then complains that she cannot find a "real" man.
> No, they were sent an email explaining that the super-mosque story was a > hoax. I was sent an email tellin me that the prime miister thought the whole thing was racist.
Which proves? There is a reason that hearsay is not allowed in courts, it's not reliable! However I did read the petition, and IMHO it was racist, it was also based on a false premise. The originator of the petition also if I remember correctly had links with the BNP.
The BNP is a perfectly valid party and has more sensible policies than the rest of them.
>> No, they were sent an email explaining that the super-mosque story was a >> hoax. > I was sent an email tellin me that the prime miister thought the whole thing > was racist. Which proves? There is a reason that hearsay is not allowed in courts, it's not reliable! However I did read the petition, and IMHO it was racist, it was also based on a false premise. The originator of the petition also if I remember correctly had links with the BNP.
The BNP is a perfectly valid party and has more sensible policies than the rest of them.
>>> No, they were sent an email explaining that the super-mosque story was a >>> hoax. >> I was sent an email tellin me that the prime miister thought the whole thing >> was racist. > Which proves? There is a reason that hearsay is not allowed in courts, > it's not reliable! However I did read the petition, and IMHO it was > racist, it was also based on a false premise. The originator of the > petition also if I remember correctly had links with the BNP. The BNP is a perfectly valid party and has more sensible policies than the rest of them.
Your opinion has been noted.
What's that supposed to mean?
It is supposed to mean that I have made a note of your opinion.
>> Which proves? There is a reason that hearsay is not allowed in courts, >> it's not reliable! However I did read the petition, and IMHO it was >> racist, it was also based on a false premise. The originator of the >> petition also if I remember correctly had links with the BNP. > The BNP is a perfectly valid party and has more sensible policies than the rest of them. Your opinion has been noted.
What's that supposed to mean?
It is supposed to mean that I have made a note of your opinion.
Are you some kind of trainspotter? You have a list of opinions? What's the point? Are you always deliberately ambiguous?
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:15:18 +0100, marc <[email hidden]> wrote:
> Peter Hucker wrote: >
<snip>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>>> Which proves? There is a reason that hearsay is not allowed in courts, >>> it's not reliable! However I did read the petition, and IMHO it was >>> racist, it was also based on a false premise. The originator of the >>> petition also if I remember correctly had links with the BNP. >> The BNP is a perfectly valid party and has more sensible policies than the rest of them. > Your opinion has been noted. What's that supposed to mean?
It is supposed to mean that I have made a note of your opinion.
Are you some kind of trainspotter?
No.
You have a list of opinions? More like a pile or a jumble than a list, certainly not ordered, collated or written down.
What's the point?
It's the sharp end of a needle, the end away from the eye.
Are you always deliberately ambiguous? No, sometimes I'm accidentally ambiguous, occasionally I might be deliberately ambiguous, often I'm deliberately forthright, on occasions I'm accidentally obvious and I have been known to be incoherent.
Peter Hucker wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:15:18 +0100, marc <[email hidden]> wrote: > >> Peter Hucker wrote: >>
<snip>
<snip>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> Your opinion has been noted. > What's that supposed to mean? >
It is supposed to mean that I have made a note of your opinion.
Are you some kind of trainspotter?
No.
Good for you. Camel spotter?
Quoted message said:
You have a list of opinions? More like a pile or a jumble than a list, certainly not ordered, collated or written down.
That's worse.
Quoted message said:
What's the point?
It's the sharp end of a needle, the end away from the eye.
Now you sound like a bot.
Quoted message said:
Are you always deliberately ambiguous? No, sometimes I'm accidentally ambiguous, occasionally I might be deliberately ambiguous, often I'm deliberately forthright, on occasions I'm accidentally obvious and I have been known to be incoherent.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:35:47 +0100, marc <[email hidden]> wrote:
> Peter Hucker wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:15:18 +0100, marc <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >>> Peter Hucker wrote: >>> <snip>
<snip>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>>> Your opinion has been noted. >> What's that supposed to mean? >> > It is supposed to mean that I have made a note of your opinion. Are you some kind of trainspotter?
No.
Good for you. Camel spotter?
No.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
You have a list of opinions? More like a pile or a jumble than a list, certainly not ordered, collated or written down.
That's worse.
Worse than what?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
What's the point?
It's the sharp end of a needle, the end away from the eye.
Now you sound like a bot.
Botness is in the eye of the beholder
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Are you always deliberately ambiguous? No, sometimes I'm accidentally ambiguous, occasionally I might be deliberately ambiguous, often I'm deliberately forthright, on occasions I'm accidentally obvious and I have been known to be incoherent.
Now you sound like me after several pints.
Nahhhh even after several pints I still know what the BNP are.