Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Megaexo vs Isis

Started by RS · · Last activity · 13 posts · 448 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 January 2007
Last activity
19 January 2007
Original author
RS
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
448
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    outboard bearings?

    thanks to all, Rick

  2. RS said:

    OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    outboard bearings?

    thanks to all, Rick

    The manufacturer's claim is that outer bearing cranks are stiffer and
    that the bearings last longer because they are bigger. Reality is you
    probably won't be able to detect or measure either one of these claims,
    so don't get your hopes up. I always buy into the new technology
    because I worry about future part replacement. One good thing about the
    new design is that the crank is easier to get off once installed. You
    will probably need to have your bottom bracket "faced" though as the
    outbearings need a more precise fit.

    Chris

  3. RS said:

    OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    outboard bearings?

    thanks to all, Rick

    What is hype is Octalink and ISIS. The lack of reliability with
    Octalink, and shimano's attempt to control 'spline' gave ride to ISIS.
    ISIS, complete with teeny bearings, doesn't last very long..enter
    outboard bearings. These DO solve problems with the two mentioned but
    it should be remembered that these two did NOT answer any question or
    solve any problem with respect to square taper. NOW the market is awash
    with these with their own set of problems, like lack of flexibility
    with regards to too small or too large BB shells and inability to make
    them work on a cross frame with fat stays, for instance. Sluugish as
    well, with all the seals.

  4. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    RS said:

    OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    outboard bearings?

    thanks to all, Rick

    What is hype is Octalink and ISIS. The lack of reliability with
    Octalink, and shimano's attempt to control 'spline' gave ride to ISIS.
    ISIS, complete with teeny bearings, doesn't last very long..enter
    outboard bearings. These DO solve problems with the two mentioned but
    it should be remembered that these two did NOT answer any question or
    solve any problem with respect to square taper. NOW the market is awash
    with these with their own set of problems, like lack of flexibility
    with regards to too small or too large BB shells and inability to make
    them work on a cross frame with fat stays, for instance. Sluugish as
    well, with all the seals.

    using megaexo, stiffest bb I've ever enjoyed; bike SQUIRTS up hills, no
    hype about that

  5. On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:28:19 -0800, RS <[email hidden]> may

    have said:

    OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype?

    If you aren't having problems with the setup you have now, then any
    advertising that seeks to lure you away from it can be regarded as
    "just hype". If you're having problems with or you are being limited
    by a shortcoming in your current setup, and a MegaExo crank would
    address the issues, then the product may have value...but the
    propaganda may still be hype.

    Quoted message said:

    It seems to make sense but does it really matter.

    It has benefits for some riders, but not all.

    Quoted message said:

    I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    outboard bearings?

    IMO, if conventional layouts are doing the job for you, there's little
    reason to swap to bleeding-edge outboard-bearing designs. OTOH, the
    ISIS BB has a known issue in at least some instances, related to the
    fact that there's a sharp shoulder on at least some of them which can
    cause shaft failure. If you need to replace your cranks, and the
    choice is between ISIS and MegaExo for a small or acceptable
    difference in price, I'd go with the outboard bearings. TJMO. YMMV.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  6. I have had all 3 types. The square taper BB were very reliable but the
    square interface is flexy. Isis BB are junk. You are lucky to get 6
    months before you have a coffee grinder. The new outboard bearing style
    are the real deal. Super stiff I can push a bigger gear in the same
    situation. I have heard the outboard bearings wear out quicker than a
    square taper due to the seals but I have not had mine long enough to
    experience this. I plan on replacing my Shimano outboard bearings with
    Enduro bearings once they wear out.

    Patrick

  7. Quoted message said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    RS said:

    OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    outboard bearings?

    thanks to all, Rick

    What is hype is Octalink and ISIS. The lack of reliability with
    Octalink, and shimano's attempt to control 'spline' gave ride to ISIS.
    ISIS, complete with teeny bearings, doesn't last very long..enter
    outboard bearings. These DO solve problems with the two mentioned but
    it should be remembered that these two did NOT answer any question or
    solve any problem with respect to square taper. NOW the market is awash
    with these with their own set of problems, like lack of flexibility
    with regards to too small or too large BB shells and inability to make
    them work on a cross frame with fat stays, for instance. Sluugish as
    well, with all the seals.

    using megaexo, stiffest bb I've ever enjoyed; bike SQUIRTS up hills, no
    hype about that

    Right, no hype at all. "Ride" mag tested these and found them the least
    stiff of many cranks.Just think how fast you would go uphill with
    shimano!!

  8. RS said:

    OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    outboard bearings?

    thanks to all, Rick

    I've got square taper on 3 or 4 bikes (including track and MTBs), Isis
    on one (MTB), Octalink on one (road), and external on a new road bike I
    just put together.

    Just to pile on, I'd put ISIS/Octalink at the bottom of the heap based
    purely on durability. Mine turn into peppermills every year, which is,
    alone, enough to go move on to a different system. Not cheap + not
    durable + largely proprietary = not good.

    The square tapers do their work without fuss. You don't have to think
    about them. Highly evolved, cheap, and they last. That is about the
    highest accolades I can give a bike product. They're the quiet members
    of this newsgroup who actually know things without having to brand it
    on your chest.

    After installing outboard on a friend's bike last summer, I thought it
    was a good system. Through the very scientific "remove the chain and
    spin the cranks" test, there's greater drag, but I'd assume that it
    will decrease over time (as the seals wear....) I installed a set of
    FSA Gossamer/FSA MegaExo on a bike I just put together and so far so
    good. I'm a big guy who can't always spin in hills so I'm hoping that
    I'll to benefit from the reported increase in stiffness, but, you know,
    perceived bb sway can have more than one culprit. And, as much as I
    hate to say it, you'll benefit from having the newest stuff which will
    save you from having to purchase an extremely rare ISIS BB at a premium
    in a year.

    /s

  9. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    Quoted message said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    RS wrote:
    > OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    > really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    > compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    > the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    > version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    > Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    > outboard bearings?
    >
    > thanks to all, Rick

    What is hype is Octalink and ISIS. The lack of reliability with
    Octalink, and shimano's attempt to control 'spline' gave ride to ISIS.
    ISIS, complete with teeny bearings, doesn't last very long..enter
    outboard bearings. These DO solve problems with the two mentioned but
    it should be remembered that these two did NOT answer any question or
    solve any problem with respect to square taper. NOW the market is awash
    with these with their own set of problems, like lack of flexibility
    with regards to too small or too large BB shells and inability to make
    them work on a cross frame with fat stays, for instance. Sluugish as
    well, with all the seals.

    using megaexo, stiffest bb I've ever enjoyed; bike SQUIRTS up hills, no
    hype about that

    Right, no hype at all. "Ride" mag tested these and found them the least
    stiff of many cranks.Just think how fast you would go uphill with
    shimano!!

    talking about bb not cranks, right ?

  10. Quoted message said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    Quoted message said:

    Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
    > RS wrote:
    > > OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    > > really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    > > compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    > > the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    > > version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    > > Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    > > outboard bearings?
    > >
    > > thanks to all, Rick
    >
    > What is hype is Octalink and ISIS. The lack of reliability with
    > Octalink, and shimano's attempt to control 'spline' gave ride to ISIS.
    > ISIS, complete with teeny bearings, doesn't last very long..enter
    > outboard bearings. These DO solve problems with the two mentioned but
    > it should be remembered that these two did NOT answer any question or
    > solve any problem with respect to square taper. NOW the market is awash
    > with these with their own set of problems, like lack of flexibility
    > with regards to too small or too large BB shells and inability to make
    > them work on a cross frame with fat stays, for instance. Sluugish as
    > well, with all the seals.

    using megaexo, stiffest bb I've ever enjoyed; bike SQUIRTS up hills, no
    hype about that

    Right, no hype at all. "Ride" mag tested these and found them the least
    stiff of many cranks.Just think how fast you would go uphill with
    shimano!!

    talking about bb not cranks, right ?

    It's a system - if one of the components is limp, the others don't
    matter all that much.

    Did love that comment that the "bike SQUIRTS up hills, no hype about
    that".

    D'ohBoy

  11. D'ohBoy said:
    Quoted message said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
    > > RS wrote:
    > > > OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    > > > really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    > > > compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    > > > the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    > > > version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    > > > Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    > > > outboard bearings?
    > > >
    > > > thanks to all, Rick
    > >
    > > What is hype is Octalink and ISIS. The lack of reliability with
    > > Octalink, and shimano's attempt to control 'spline' gave ride to ISIS.
    > > ISIS, complete with teeny bearings, doesn't last very long..enter
    > > outboard bearings. These DO solve problems with the two mentioned but
    > > it should be remembered that these two did NOT answer any question or
    > > solve any problem with respect to square taper. NOW the market is awash
    > > with these with their own set of problems, like lack of flexibility
    > > with regards to too small or too large BB shells and inability to make
    > > them work on a cross frame with fat stays, for instance. Sluugish as
    > > well, with all the seals.
    >
    > using megaexo, stiffest bb I've ever enjoyed; bike SQUIRTS up hills, no
    > hype about that

    Right, no hype at all. "Ride" mag tested these and found them the least
    stiff of many cranks.Just think how fast you would go uphill with
    shimano!!

    talking about bb not cranks, right ?

    It's a system - if one of the components is limp, the others don't
    matter all that much.

    Don't be a party pooper! ;-)

    Now that those wimpy square taper BB spindles have been dealt with, I'm
    waiting for Shimano to resurrect the Dynadrive pedals (with a new name
    of course). This time around, they can make the dropped pedal spindle
    larger in diameter, for more stiffness. And all those bleeding edge
    riders will need new cranks for the new stiffer pedals.

    Quoted message said:


    Did love that comment that the "bike SQUIRTS up hills, no hype about
    that".

    There's nothing like expectation effects to cloud over reality!

  12. Quoted message said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    Quoted message said:

    Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
    > RS wrote:
    > > OK, is the megaexo thing just Hype? It seems to make sense but does it
    > > really matter. I've got a road bike (Fondriest) that I'm going to try a
    > > compact on. I've get extra ISIS brackets and was thinking of going with
    > > the ISIS version of the FSS Energy Compact. They also make a newer
    > > version with the outboard bearings? Or I might try the Shimano R700.
    > > Any thoughts on worth the bit of extra money for the newest thing,
    > > outboard bearings?
    > >
    > > thanks to all, Rick
    >
    > What is hype is Octalink and ISIS. The lack of reliability with
    > Octalink, and shimano's attempt to control 'spline' gave ride to ISIS.
    > ISIS, complete with teeny bearings, doesn't last very long..enter
    > outboard bearings. These DO solve problems with the two mentioned but
    > it should be remembered that these two did NOT answer any question or
    > solve any problem with respect to square taper. NOW the market is awash
    > with these with their own set of problems, like lack of flexibility
    > with regards to too small or too large BB shells and inability to make
    > them work on a cross frame with fat stays, for instance. Sluugish as
    > well, with all the seals.

    using megaexo, stiffest bb I've ever enjoyed; bike SQUIRTS up hills, no
    hype about that

    Right, no hype at all. "Ride" mag tested these and found them the least
    stiff of many cranks.Just think how fast you would go uphill with
    shimano!!

    talking about bb not cranks, right ?

    yep, crank stiffness, along with a BB spindle that does not twist, in
    any system. Outboard bearings are stiffer but whether or not it has an
    significant effect on cycling performance, well, I'll remain skeptical.

  13. D'ohBoy said:
    Quoted message said:


    It's a system - if one of the components is limp, the others don't
    matter all that much.

    Did love that comment that the "bike SQUIRTS up hills, no hype about
    that".

    D'ohBoy

    it's all subjective, I've never noticed crank flex under any
    conditions; but I DID notice when I went from a shimano cartridge bb
    system with square taper to mega exo system on my regular hilly routes

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.