<[email hidden]> schreef:
Quoted message said:Dianabol simply is highly effective in low doses(25-40 mg ed). Som say
Anadrol, a comparable steroid to methandrostenolone, is better, but its
taken in doses of 50-150 mg.
Good point.
But you have to take into consideration that some websites claim it is only
1/3 as strong, while the other end of the spectrum is that it is even a bit
stronger on a mg/mg basis.
My best *estimate* is that 35-40mg Dbol equals 50mg oxy.
But then again i can get 100/5mg Naposim tabs for 40 Euro, but oxy will only
cost me 120 Euro for 100/50mg
How much do you pay in the US for both?
Quoted message said:If one was to take methandrostenolone in
those doses better gains could be expected.
Oh, defenitely!
I never took more then 40mg, but the results were pleasing. (stacked with
Deca/Sust)
Quoted message said:Methandrostenolone is also
a lot safer in as opposed to the highly toxic and progestagenic
anadrol.
I think Dianabol is just as toxic as oxy.
And if you stack Anadrol the right way, the side effects are really not that
nasty.
(personally, 1st time i took it, i stopped after 4 days, i got headaches and
insomnia)
Quoted message said:If one takes into account that the half-life of
methandrostenolone in the body is only 3-6 hours, this theory makes
even more sense. So taking your daily dose spread over 3 or 4 doses may
elicit a better effect than only 1 or 2 doses.
Agreed.
Quoted message said:Methandrostenolone is
quite effective in these lower doses by the way. Milligram for
Milligram its more powerful than a testosterone ester, generally
considered the best mass-builder.
I really am not sure.
Ever considered stacking both?
----
Pete