MFW Troll Filter FAQ (Update)

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

Hey the davidson link isn't working at the moment.

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:

http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:

http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.

Stay tuned ...

Jeff Finlayson said:

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

Hey the davidson link isn't working at the moment.

I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.

Stay tuned ...

Jeff Finlayson said:

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

Hey the davidson link isn't working at the moment.

And neither is the totally unbelievably silly Troll Filter FAQ.

As predicted it has made no difference to the dynamics of MFW and John
Williams is a "trolling" fraud trying to keep the "troll" wars alive
and active.

Trolling hasn't been mentioned since he last raised it. I leave you to
make up your own minds about who is doing the real "trolling" - the
Davidson psychopath notwithstanding. There is no getting rid of
Davidson as he is simply very unwell, and Williams doesn't have the
skills to cope with him.

Williams and Davidson are the only *real* "trolls" at MFW, and of the
two I prefer Davidson - at least you can recognise his twaddle for
what it is, and ignore it. Williams is a great deal more insidious, as
he adopts an oily plausibility while distracting us from his real
intentions, by sometimes posting loftily on-topic.

The Group has been going on quite nicely for a while now, but it is
clear that Williams doesn't want that, and obviously wants me
responding to his provocation, so he can get Lee and Will back
squabbling with Curt, The Oz and myself, while he limits himself to
his snide 3rd party sniping.

Don't be fooled by him folks, and for the more realistic MFW Troll
Filter FAQ you should see the updated:
http://www.fitnwell.net/mfw_troll_filter_faq.htm

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:

http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

Just what sort of Troll FAQ is he running here, if its not working for
goodness sake? How very silly.

Don't worry Om my old mate, this one is working fine:
http://www.fitnwell.net/mfw_troll_filter_faq.htm

;o)

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:

http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.

Stay tuned ...

Ok. :-)

I really WOULD like to ban that loser for good!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:

http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.

Stay tuned ...

[censored]!

<Williams translator>

Oops, made another [censored], and it still won't work as it's a heap of
[censored].

</Williams translator>

JMW said:

Jeff Finlayson said:

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

Hey the davidson link isn't working at the moment.

I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.

Stay tuned ...

[censored]!

<Williams translator>

Oops, made another [censored], and it still won't work as it's a heap of
[censored].

</Williams translator>

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

> The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
>
> http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm
>
> This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
> most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
> provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
> identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:
>
> http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.

Stay tuned ...

Ok. :-)

I really WOULD like to ban that loser for good!

Williams can't help you Om. He's just bullshitting to make himself
look important.

In article <[email hidden]>,

JRH said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:

http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm

This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:

http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

Just what sort of Troll FAQ is he running here, if its not working for
goodness sake? How very silly.

Don't worry Om my old mate, this one is working fine:
http://www.fitnwell.net/mfw_troll_filter_faq.htm

;o)

<lol> Thanks for a good laugh!!!!!
You are too funny........
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

In article <[email hidden]>,

JRH said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:

>In article <[email hidden]>,
> JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>> The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
>>
>> http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm
>>
>> This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
>> most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
>> provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
>> identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:
>>
>> http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm
>
>That link is not working...

I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.

Stay tuned ...

Ok. :-)

I really WOULD like to ban that loser for good!

Williams can't help you Om. He's just bullshitting to make himself
look important.

To date, I've just been KF'ing Davidson on the run.
He ceased to amuse me ages ago.

Now he's just a waste of bandwidth.

The best trolls are at least entertaining!

HAGW mate!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JRH said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

> OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email hidden]>,
> > JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >> The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
> >>
> >> http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm
> >>
> >> This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
> >> most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
> >> provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
> >> identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:
> >>
> >> http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm
> >
> >That link is not working...
>
> I just took it down. I noticed some inconsistencies in the path
> across several posts where the suggested filter string was not always
> present. There are some other strings that *are* always present, but
> I want to be sure they are suitable for identification.
>
> Stay tuned ...

Ok. :-)

I really WOULD like to ban that loser for good!

Williams can't help you Om. He's just bullshitting to make himself
look important.

To date, I've just been KF'ing Davidson on the run.
He ceased to amuse me ages ago.

Now he's just a waste of bandwidth.

The best trolls are at least entertaining!

HAGW mate!

Can't do that mate, I'm on the wagon until I've lost a years
accumulated blubber - again. Should be okay at least by Easter, but
maybe by the end of February - at the earliest!! ;o)

You have a good one though - and the rest of you others that aren't a
greedy bugger like me!

HAGW! ;o)

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JRH said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

> The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
>
> http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm
>
> This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
> most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
> provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
> identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:
>
> http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

Just what sort of Troll FAQ is he running here, if its not working for
goodness sake? How very silly.

Don't worry Om my old mate, this one is working fine:
http://www.fitnwell.net/mfw_troll_filter_faq.htm

;o)

<lol> Thanks for a good laugh!!!!!
You are too funny........

HEH!

Jeff Finlayson said:

Hey the davidson link isn't working at the moment.

I hacked the site, and deleted it.

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

JRH said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

> The updated version of the MFW Troll Filter FAQ is available at:
>
> http://www.rustyiron.net/trollfaq.htm
>
> This update includes new hints for killfiling Bill Davidson, MFW's
> most prolific troll, who has recently found a Usenet provider that
> provides limited Usenet headers for identification. Find out how to
> identify and killfile Davidson's posts here:
>
> http://www.rustyiron.net/davidson.htm

That link is not working...

Just what sort of Troll FAQ is he running here, if its not working for
goodness sake? How very silly.

Don't worry Om my old mate, this one is working fine:
http://www.fitnwell.net/mfw_troll_filter_faq.htm

;o)

<lol> Thanks for a good laugh!!!!!
You are too funny........

You are too easily amused. But that OK. However, you also seem to be
one of the few remaining conduits for quoting troll posts.

Before Mr. Pompous starts blowing excretia out his keyboard, that
doesn't mean that I plan to "out" you or add your email address to the
"troll enablers" on the troll list. The best solution may be to just
put you on one of Forté Agent's "timed killfiles" for a few days at a
time and see how much of a difference it makes.

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

I really WOULD like to ban that loser for good!

Only because I am the one who exposed you for sexually abusing your
elderly father.

In article <[email hidden]>,

JRH said:

Can't do that mate, I'm on the wagon until I've lost a years
accumulated blubber - again. Should be okay at least by Easter, but
maybe by the end of February - at the earliest!! ;o)

Tsk! You can always look for "natural" highs........ ;-D
I'm trying to get back on the low/no carb wagon myself,
so I feel your pain.

Quoted message said:

You have a good one though - and the rest of you others that aren't a
greedy bugger like me!

HAGW! ;o)

Cheers!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

You are too easily amused. But that OK. However, you also seem to be
one of the few remaining conduits for quoting troll posts.

Before Mr. Pompous starts blowing excretia out his keyboard, that
doesn't mean that I plan to "out" you or add your email address to the
"troll enablers" on the troll list. The best solution may be to just
put you on one of Forté Agent's "timed killfiles" for a few days at a
time and see how much of a difference it makes.

Don't be such a sourpuss... ;-)
I can find things amusing without supporting them.
I find amusement in the language usage and he is a skilled writer.

Lighten up!

Cheers!!!!!!!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson