UK and Europe · Public discussion

mountain bike

Started by steve · · Last activity · 9 posts · 288 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
1 May 2006
Last activity
2 May 2006
Original author
steve
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
288
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. i am new to mountain biking and have up to 400 quid to buy a new bike i

    have been thinking along the lines of the gt avalanche 2.0 disc or the
    trek 4300 disc wondered what your thoughts are on these bikes? or
    indeed if you can identify any other bike that may be suitable

    i will be using it both for trails and road use but am not going to
    become involved in any serious mountain biking just mainly for fitness
    and leisure.

    If anyone has any thoughts i would be only to pleased to hear from you

    ta
    steve ;-)

  2. steve said:

    i am new to mountain biking and have up to 400 quid to buy a new bike i

    Quoted message said:

    have been thinking along the lines of the gt avalanche 2.0 disc or the
    trek 4300 disc wondered what your thoughts are on these bikes? or
    indeed if you can identify any other bike that may be suitable

    Quoted message said:

    i will be using it both for trails and road use but am not going to
    become involved in any serious mountain biking just mainly for fitness
    and leisure.

    In which case I'd avoid the disc brakes. Unless you're spending
    Real Money (TM) then they're no better than well adjusted V-brakes,
    but take more out of your budget, weigh more and the pads are
    harder to get and cost more. Only real advantage at this price
    point is if you have a particular affinity for deep mud and grit,
    and it sounds like you don't.

    If it's not "serious mountain biking" I'd be more inlined to get a
    26" wheel hybrid which will do a lot better on the road at the
    expense of not quite so well off it on tricky technical stuff, but
    typical trails don't have much of that.

    Something like a Marin Muirwoods, perhaps. With the money going on
    good frame and decent components, rather than Bling! discs and
    suspension, you'll get a more efficient bike that lasts longer.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, steve

    (') said:

    i am new to mountain biking and have up to 400 quid to buy a new bike i

    have been thinking along the lines of the gt avalanche 2.0 disc or the
    trek 4300 disc wondered what your thoughts are on these bikes? or
    indeed if you can identify any other bike that may be suitable

    If you've got limited money do not get disk brakes. Decent disk brakes
    cost £100 each so that means the rest of the bike is as good as a £250
    bike with V brakes. Cheap disk brakes are no better than V brakes except
    in exceptionally gloopy conditions, and even good disk brakes are not
    much better than Vs.

    Quoted message said:

    i will be using it both for trails and road use but am not going to
    become involved in any serious mountain biking just mainly for fitness
    and leisure.

    In that case don't get a mountain bike at all. Mountain bikes are not at
    all good on tarmac - the geometry is wrong, the suspension works against
    you, and the tyres are draggy. All that adds up to seriously hard work.
    A good hybrid with no suspension and 700c wheels with narrow, slick or
    nearly slick tyres will be enormously better for trails and road use.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Hobbit ringleader gives Sauron One in the Eye.

  4. steve said:

    i am new to mountain biking and have up to 400 quid to buy a new bike i

    have been thinking along the lines of the gt avalanche 2.0 disc or the
    trek 4300 disc wondered what your thoughts are on these bikes? or
    indeed if you can identify any other bike that may be suitable

    i will be using it both for trails and road use but am not going to
    become involved in any serious mountain biking just mainly for fitness
    and leisure.

    If anyone has any thoughts i would be only to pleased to hear from you

    ta
    steve ;-)


    Depends what you mean by 'serious'. Don't think my missus would regard
    her MTB-ing as 'serious' (except when she got bitten by a traveller's
    unchained dog, and that turned out to be not that serious, just
    painful) but she has done some lumpy bits of the South Downs Way and
    Dartmoor on her '03 GT Avalanche 2.0 (definitely a nice bike, which I
    can recommend); I don't think a hybrid would have been fun at all 😉

    So if you want to do some mountain biking i.e. go up and down hills
    using other than Sustrans cycle paths, with the odd bit of road use (eg
    nip to shops), then go the MTB route as the front suspension and big
    tyres will make life a whole lot more comfortable.

    I'd second what others have said about discs: I have Avids (best cable
    discs?) on my recumbent road bike, but only because of their higher
    heat capacity when used with 20" wheels ('bents go downhills FAST), but
    Vees on my MTB's. For what you want I'd go for a better spec fork (but
    stay with 3 x 8 transmission), but I can see where you are coming from
    as most £350-£400 'packages' seem to have discs.... Definitely add
    'bling' which would help (a lot) if you find you don't like MTB's and
    want to sell after a year.

    Hope this helps.

  5. squeaker said:

    So if you want to do some mountain biking i.e. go up and down hills
    using other than Sustrans cycle paths, with the odd bit of road use (eg
    nip to shops), then go the MTB route as the front suspension and big
    tyres will make life a whole lot more comfortable.

    But OTOH they'll make the bike a chore on the roads. If it's a
    one-bike-fits-all then you'll have to accept compromises. I have a MTB
    I use for my rare off-road forays, but if I had to choose a
    one-bike-fits-all for occasional off-road and mainly on, it wouldn't be
    an MTB. Especially as it's easy enough to hire one in the sort of
    places you'll want a serious off-roader.

    Quoted message said:

    I'd second what others have said about discs: I have Avids (best cable
    discs?) on my recumbent road bike, but only because of their higher
    heat capacity when used with 20" wheels

    I've been a bit ambivalent about the Avid mech discs I've tried on the
    demo bikes at Kinetics. I much prefer the Magura HS-33 hydraulic rim
    brakes I have on my 'bent (20/26), and that's done some /huge/ descents
    at speed with full-on touring gear and it's not been a problem.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  6. steve said:

    i am new to mountain biking and have up to 400 quid to buy a new bike i

    have been thinking along the lines of the gt avalanche 2.0 disc or the
    trek 4300 disc wondered what your thoughts are on these bikes? or
    indeed if you can identify any other bike that may be suitable

    i will be using it both for trails and road use but am not going to
    become involved in any serious mountain biking just mainly for fitness
    and leisure.

    If anyone has any thoughts i would be only to pleased to hear from you

    ta
    steve ;-

    You could always go secondhand. £400 would get you a good
    Stumpjumper, or an excellent Rockhopper (for example). You'd almost
    certainly get good discs on the Rockhopper. Check out ebay and the
    classifieds section of singletrackworld (which may be better for you
    than ebay as it's not an auction, so you can check the bike out before
    buying.).

    As others have said though, Discs aren't that much better than properly
    set up V's, and checp suspension is just added weight and drag. I'd
    also invest in a couple of pairs of tyres, some slicks if your're jusy
    going on road, and some not so slicks if your doing bridlepaths.
    Others may suggest tyres like the Crossroads, whcih are apparently good

    on road and light off road (I have no experience of these however).

    Bryan

  7. "yorky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    You could always go secondhand. £400 would get you a good
    Stumpjumper, or an excellent Rockhopper (for example). You'd almost
    certainly get good discs on the Rockhopper. Check out ebay and the
    classifieds section of singletrackworld (which may be better for you
    than ebay as it's not an auction, so you can check the bike out before
    buying.).

    The problem here being that a keen cyclist may be able to spot the
    difference between a real bargain and a pile of poo but a newbie may not.
    So unless you think you have a reasonable idea I'd suggest you go down the
    bike shop route, or buy mail order brand new if you've half an idea ;-)

    My 10p,
    Pete

  8. The GT or a nice Specialized would do you fine. Avoid the disks brakes
    as they are an unecessary expense unless you are planning on getting
    very muddy.

  9. in message <[email hidden]>, yorky

    (') said:

    As others have said though, Discs aren't that much better than properly
    set up V's, and checp suspension is just added weight and drag. I'd
    also invest in a couple of pairs of tyres, some slicks if your're jusy
    going on road, and some not so slicks if your doing bridlepaths.
    Others may suggest tyres like the Crossroads, whcih are apparently good
    on road and light off road (I have no experience of these however).

    If you're going down the 'two sets of tyres' route it's worth thinking of
    buying a second pair of wheels. Continually changing tyres is a drag,
    and one decent bike with two decent sets of wheels and tyres is a good
    bit cheaper and a good bit less hassle to store than two decent bikes.

    However, even with narrow slick tyres, a mountain bike's pretty
    compromised on the road.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    Ye hypocrites! are these your pranks? To murder men and give God thanks?
    Desist, for shame! Proceed no further: God won't accept your thanks for
    murther
    -- Robert Burns, 'Thanksgiving For a National Victory'

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.