The message <[email hidden]>
from "Paul Saunders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:
Quoted message said:Derek wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:A new mountain weather service is available from Metcheck.com
metcheck.commountain.aspOpen ↗
Quoted message said:Very interesting. Surprisingly detailed. Impossibly so I reckon. Given that they often can't
forecast correctly whether it will rain or not, forecasting how many millimetres of rain will
fall on a specific mountain range within a three hour period seems amazingly ambitious. 9% of
mist and 27% of cloud? Rain to the millimetre, windspeed to the mile and temperature to a tenth
of a degree?
Quoted message said:Full marks for trying, but I don't see how they could possibly be that accurate. Might be
interesting to print one of these out for a weekend then go camping in the target area and see how
close it is.
I couldn't persuade it to give me a mountain forecast but the Tuesday one for Wednesday in Cumbria
was a pretty good fit unlike the lazy disregard for the actuality put out by The BBC at 5 am this
morning (Wednesday) which pretended that by 6 am the rain belt would be East of the A1 (or
thereabouts) when the trailing edge was really the other side of the Pennines.
I wouldn't argue with the amounts of rain in the morning sessions (0.4 mm) or the cloud cover which
was forecast from 100% down to 9% during the period I was there. There was a stiff breeze on the
tops and for all I know that could easily be the forecast 12/13 mph.
--
Roger Looking North over the Aire Valley (and Marley Gasworks) to Rombolds Moor Top Posters
killfiled on sight