General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Na Na Na

Started by Hotmoon · · Last activity · 12 posts · 445 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 December 2003
Last activity
16 December 2003
Original author
Hotmoon
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
445
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Didn't read your responses. Na Na Na

    Ya' can't hurt me. Ha Ha Ha

    And I know that any debunker is too shallow to understand transcendental wisdom anyway, so your
    responses would be like trying to have a philosophy discussion with a clam.

  2. This is soooo intelligent....

    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Didn't read your responses. Na Na Na

    Ya' can't hurt me. Ha Ha Ha

    And I know that any debunker is too shallow to understand transcendental wisdom anyway, so your
    responses would be like trying to have a philosophy discussion with a clam.

  3. Quoted message said:

    Didn't read your responses. Na Na Na

    Ya' can't hurt me. Ha Ha Ha

    And I know that any debunker is too shallow to understand transcendental wisdom anyway, so your
    responses would be like trying to have a philosophy discussion with a clam.

    Whether you clam-up or ostrich-size yourself by burying your head in the sand, it is YOUR loss.

    You have your belief system which is based, in large part, upon supersitition and disproven notions.
    You have the right to retain it, sustain it, & derange it as you see fit.

    If you ever acquire the ability to learn and accept constructive criticism, you are more than
    welcome to learn from the learned MHA faithful.

  4. "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]... ...understand

    Quoted message said:

    transcendental ...

    Transcendental numbers are numbers that are not an algebraic number to any degree. The ratio of a
    circle's circumference to its diameter is a transcendental number, it is pi.
    mathworld.wolfram.comTranscendentalNumber.html mathworld.wolfram.comPi.html

    Seeing what you write about those who understand science... it seems that you have very little
    understanding on what it is and how it works. You may do well to go to your nearest community
    college and take a beginning course in science and basic math. Also, if there is an opportunity, you
    should try to get to something like a program open house... Like in February there is Engineer'sWeek
    where the local engineering societies set up programs to show the public what they do (I've attended
    engineering open houses at a couple of universities, and an astronomy open house elsewhere -- I
    usually take a few kids to them since they are fun). You will see that knowing and using science is
    not like a cult belief system, and can actually be fun.

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    hotmoon said:

    Didn't read your responses. Na Na Na

    Ya' can't hurt me. Ha Ha Ha

    And I know that any debunker is too shallow to understand transcendental wisdom anyway, so your
    responses would be like trying to have a philosophy discussion with a clam.

    God, what a weak effort at trolling. Pathetic.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always
    correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my
    shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  6. (hotmoon) said:

    Didn't read your responses. Na Na Na

    Ya' can't hurt me. Ha Ha Ha

    And I know that any debunker is too shallow to understand transcendental wisdom anyway, so your
    responses would be like trying to have a philosophy discussion with a clam.

    "Discussion with a clam". It's why we don't try to debate Scientologists.

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project ratbags.comrsoles
    The Green Light ratbags.comgreenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 ratbags.comloon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  7. HCN, I think you read his post a little fast. He said Transcendental Wisdom (which is 'the right use
    of Spiritual knowledge'😉

    He is reacting to the way debunkers handle topics they don't like. Which in here, seems to be
    everything.

    Mike

  8. Markasurusias Probertasaurusias said:

    This is soooo intelligent....

    There's a saying, "daft as a Dodo"..........I think Bird is an appropriate name......nutty as a
    fruit cake, I reckon.

    Quoted message said:

    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Didn't read your responses. Na Na Na

    Ya' can't hurt me. Ha Ha Ha

    And I know that any debunker is too shallow to understand transcendental wisdom anyway, so your
    responses would be like trying to have a philosophy discussion with a clam.

  9. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    HCN, I think you read his post a little fast. He said Transcendental Wisdom


    .. A subjective made up term... and no I did not read it too fast. I submitted a definition rooted
    in mathematical reality.

    Just as a human body reacts to real problems (like viruses, bacteria, physical impacts) they should
    dealth with using real medicine. Not made up nostrums and feelings. "Transcendental Wisdom" will not
    remove bacterium Bordetella pertussis from an infant who was coughed upon.

  10. dickinson said:
    Markasurusias Probertasaurusias said:

    This is soooo intelligent....

    There's a saying, "daft as a Dodo"..........I think Bird is an appropriate name......nutty as a
    fruit cake, I reckon.

    Fruity as a NutCake ?
    --

    Take out the G'RBAGE to reply
    [email hidden]

  11. HCN said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    HCN, I think you read his post a little fast. He said Transcendental Wisdom


    .. A subjective made up term... and no I did not read it too fast. I submitted a definition rooted
    in mathematical reality.

    Transcendental Wisdom is a description. If you're an athiest then the action it describes may not
    have validity to you, but the description still exists.

    Quoted message said:

    Just as a human body reacts to real problems (like viruses, bacteria, physical impacts) they should
    dealth with using real medicine. Not made up nostrums and feelings. "Transcendental Wisdom" will
    not remove bacterium Bordetella pertussis from an infant who was coughed upon.

    That's some hefty expectations to put on people who view the world from a different angle than you.
    I didn't say I agree with the opposite of what you wrote, just that you have walled away a lot of
    options that could open other doorways.

    I knew a math mastermind who enjoyed connecting mathematical models with Spiritual understanding
    outside Physics, but I'm sure he would have enjoyed the String Theories.

    Not everything you only partially understand is a made up nostrum. A + B = C in your life, doesn't
    mean it's the only way to get to C in mine.

    Mike

  12. WB said:
    dickinson said:
    Markasurusias Probertasaurusias said:

    This is soooo intelligent....

    There's a saying, "daft as a Dodo"..........I think Bird is an appropriate name......nutty as a
    fruit cake, I reckon.

    Fruity as a NutCake ?

    That too.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.