Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Nashbar Cassettes?

Started by JBAFromNY · · Last activity · 8 posts · 453 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
30 August 2005
Last activity
1 September 2005
Original author
JBAFromNY
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
453
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As part of a quest to upgrade a bike on the cheap, I've noticed that
    Nashbar's house brand cassettes are cheaper than Shimano, SRAM, and
    Campy, and come in a cog combination I can use. Are they any good?
    Will spending a bit more on Shimano get me noticeably better shifting
    and/or durability?

    TIA,
    John

  2. "JBAFromNY" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:1125422675.023311.18900
    @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

    Quoted message said:

    As part of a quest to upgrade a bike on the cheap, I've noticed that
    Nashbar's house brand cassettes are cheaper than Shimano, SRAM, and
    Campy, and come in a cog combination I can use. Are they any good?
    Will spending a bit more on Shimano get me noticeably better shifting
    and/or durability?

    TIA,
    John

    I bought a 9-speed 11-34 Nashbar cassette for my spare dirt bike wheels
    that I have slicks on. It's chromed, and noticeably heavier than the SRAM
    11-32 that came with the bike. The chrome started flaking after about 200
    miles, but the exposed metal underneath hasn't rusted and shifting is
    unaffected.

    It looks as cheap as it sells for, but it functions fine.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Hank Wirtz said:

    "JBAFromNY" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:1125422675.023311.18900
    @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

    Quoted message said:

    As part of a quest to upgrade a bike on the cheap, I've noticed that
    Nashbar's house brand cassettes are cheaper than Shimano, SRAM, and
    Campy, and come in a cog combination I can use. Are they any good?
    Will spending a bit more on Shimano get me noticeably better shifting
    and/or durability?

    TIA,
    John

    I bought a 9-speed 11-34 Nashbar cassette for my spare dirt bike wheels
    that I have slicks on. It's chromed, and noticeably heavier than the SRAM
    11-32 that came with the bike. The chrome started flaking after about 200
    miles, but the exposed metal underneath hasn't rusted and shifting is
    unaffected.

    It looks as cheap as it sells for, but it functions fine.

    Hm. Chrome? I bet it's a house-branded Sunrace:

    http://www.sunrace.com/productpage.asp?prodLine=R80&category=cassettes

    I have one of these or something reasonably similar. It works.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  4. Ryan Cousineau <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    Hm. Chrome? I bet it's a house-branded Sunrace:

    You are 100% correct. The tip-off is the "MegaGear" sticker on the 34 -
    Sunrace's goof on Shimano's MegaRange line.

  5. According to JBAFromNY <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    As part of a quest to upgrade a bike on the cheap, I've noticed that
    Nashbar's house brand cassettes are cheaper than Shimano, SRAM, and
    Campy, and come in a cog combination I can use. Are they any good?
    Will spending a bit more on Shimano get me noticeably better shifting
    and/or durability?

    I use an 8-speed Nashbar cassette on my mountain bike and it shifts
    wonderfully. It's heavy enough that I suspect it will be longer-lived
    than a comparable Shimano part.

    ---
    Lars Lehtonen
    Los Angeles Bicycle Calendar: http://calendar.bikeboom.com

  6. Lars Lehtonen said:

    According to JBAFromNY <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    As part of a quest to upgrade a bike on the cheap, I've noticed that
    Nashbar's house brand cassettes are cheaper than Shimano, SRAM, and
    Campy, and come in a cog combination I can use. Are they any good?
    Will spending a bit more on Shimano get me noticeably better shifting
    and/or durability?

    I use an 8-speed Nashbar cassette on my mountain bike and it shifts
    wonderfully. It's heavy enough that I suspect it will be longer-lived
    than a comparable Shimano part.

    I used one of these for a while. Besides being much heavier (than SRAM)
    it had a tendency to shed teeth. I think the SRAM cassettes are a better
    value.

  7. Lars Lehtonen said:

    I use an 8-speed Nashbar cassette on my mountain bike and it shifts
    wonderfully. It's heavy enough that I suspect it will be longer-lived
    than a comparable Shimano part.

    Considering that the difference in weight between the two cassettes is
    almost certainly due to less material toward teh center of the cogs,
    or on the "spider" and not the steel teeth, I doubt that.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  8. According to John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Lars Lehtonen said:

    I use an 8-speed Nashbar cassette on my mountain bike and it shifts
    wonderfully. It's heavy enough that I suspect it will be longer-lived
    than a comparable Shimano part.

    Considering that the difference in weight between the two cassettes is
    almost certainly due to less material toward teh center of the cogs,
    or on the "spider" and not the steel teeth, I doubt that.

    Are you comparing the two of them right now, or is there just something
    magic about the word "Shimano?"

    --
    Lars Lehtonen

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.