General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Never allow psychiatry to force itself upon you.

Started by The Only True B · · Last activity · 8 posts · 621 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postNever allow psychiatry to force itself upon you.The Only True B · 26 Jan 2004 02 / This pagePosts 1–8Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #8Ria · 17 Feb 2004

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
26 January 2004
Last activity
17 February 2004
Original author
The Only True B
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
621
Views / 30 days
3

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    The Only True B
    Archived post
    #1

    The dangers inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs highlights the importance of the
    individual's interest in avoiding forced treatment. These medications can produce debilitating, life-
    altering and even fatal side-effects. Thus, they bear no resemblance to much less intrusive medical
    interventions which courts have detennined implicate only a minimal liberty interest. See Schmerber,
    384 U.S. at 771 (pin [censored] of finger for a blood test). Indeed, the risks and extent of that
    inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs to pretrial detainees are at least as serious
    as those which the Court has previously held to outweigh the government's interests. See Winston v.
    Lee, 470 U.S. 753,755- 56 (1985) (surgical removal of a bullet); Rochin v. California, 342 U.S.
    165,172 (1952) (forced insertion of a stomach pump). The use of chemical agents to alter one's mind
    and to potentially affect one's muscular and other bodily functions is at least as invasive as the
    mechanical invasion of surgery. The pre-trial detainee's interest in avoiding the administration of
    these dangerous and potentially life-threatening drugs should not be infringed unless the
    government's action is the least restrictive means by which it may accomplish a compelling interest.

    When those drugs harm pre-trail detainees, it will also harm the private person. Look at Dave Rice.
    He is swallowing such stuff and recommending it to others over and over again. Then he posts stuff
    like suggesting to kill members of the FBI and claims later he can't remember that anymore. Terrible
    what those drugs do to you!

    Barbara Schwarz (the only real one)

    P.S. Postings with e-mail address [email hidden] and identities "Barbara_Schwarz",
    "the real Barbara Schwarz de Rothschild" and "Truth Speaker 2" are not done by me. Those are
    forgeries of criminal, Aids infected, gay lunatic Garry Lynn Scarff who is a fanatical Dave
    Touretzky defender. Scarff persecutes me from thread to thread often using my name as identity
    for those crimes (!) and

    tries to intimidate me, libels, insults and lies about me. He also lied that he spoke to a roomate
    of mine in the Utah mental health hospital. I never was in that hospital, but he probably escaped
    from one. Scarff is active member of the gay WeHo "church", that according to Scarff applaudes
    Scarffs lawless behavior against me. An ex-WeHo member wrote me that this "church" sanctions and
    promotes dishonorable behavior and that he and his friends were raped and drugged by one of their
    active members, and that one of their active members murdered others under the guise of "drug
    overdose". The ex-WeHo wrote that the

    doesn't see what's wrong with that.

    Frederic Rice, another fierce David Touretzky defender, posted also with the stolen identity de
    Rothschild. He is as little a de Rothschild as a dirty slimy and greasy punch bag is an impressive
    man. He threatened governmental officials over the Internet, wants to celebrate when both President
    Bush's are dead and has tips on his website on how to kill bikers.

    His brother David Rice, posts with "Dr." or "Reverend" Desertphile and also with the stolen identity
    de Rothschild. He suggested to kill members of the FBI. (Go to www.religiousfreedom.watch.org, the
    extremist pages on David Touretzky, page 9, his connections and click on the PDF file.) Dave Rice
    also posted a long time with the identity "Prozac filled gay terrorist psycho", which tells a lot
    about him.

    Barbara Graham Warr, self-proclaimed "caplain" of the A.R.S. newsgroup and snakepit, another David
    Touretzky promoter, is a DUI offender and pleaded guilty to possession and manufacturing of
    prohibited weapon under California penal code. She congratulated the WeHo "congregation" accepting
    Scarff's criminal behaviors against me. However, she posted before that there is no God. She also
    posts with stolen identity de Rothschild. - For more, click on the below links.

    ----------------------------------------------
    Linda Anderson religiousfreedomwatch.organdersenl1.html Gerald Armstrong
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgarmstrong1.html Jim Beebe
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgbeebej1.html Graham Berry
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgberry.html David Bird
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgbirdd1.html Tory Christman
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgchristmant4.html Ursula Caberta
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcaberta.html Ida Camburn
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcamburn1.html Joe Cisar
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcisarj1.html Robert Clark
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgclark1.html Elizabeth Ann Cox
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcoxea1.html Mark Dallara
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgdallara1.html Alexander Dvorkin
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgdvorkin1.html Valerie Emanuel
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgemanuelv1.html Steven Fishman
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgfishman1.html Vickki Ford Cook
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgfordv1.html Phil Georgi
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgjacobsen6.html Scott Goehring
    religiousfreedomwatch.orggoehrings1.html Roger Gonnet
    religiousfreedomwatch.orggonnet1.html Barbara Graham
    religiousfreedomwatch.orggraham1.html Gregg Hagglund
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghagglund1.html Steve Hassan
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghassan1.html Tilman Hausherr
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghauser1.html Andreas Heldal-Lund
    religiousfreedomwatch.orglund1.html Keith Henson
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghenson1.html Deana Holmes
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgholmes1.html Jeff Jacobsen
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgjacobsen1.html Patrick Jost
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgjost1.html Charlotte Kates
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgkatesc1.html Rod Keller
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgkeller1.html Steven Kent
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgkent1.html Arnie Lerma
    religiousfreedomwatch.orglerma1.html Joe Lynn
    religiousfreedomwatch.orglynn1.html Ted Mayett
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgmayett1.html Frank Oliver
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgoliver.html Kady O'Malley
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgomalley1.html Zenon Panoussis
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpanoussis1.html Ted Patrick
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpatrick1.html Michael Pattinson
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpattinsonm1.html Robert Peterson
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpeterson1.html Bruce/Kathleen Pettycrew
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpettycrew.html Jesse Prince
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgprince1.html Roland Rashleigh-Berry
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgrashleighb1.html David Rice
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgriced.html Fred Rice
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgricef.html Rick Ross
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgrossr1.html Karin Spaink
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgspaink1.html David Touretzky
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgtouretzky1.html Alan Walter
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgwalter1.html Grady Ward
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgward.html Johan Wevers
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgweversj1.html Hana/Jerry Whitfield
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgwhitfield1.html Larry Wollersheim
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgwollersheim1.html Sten-Arne Zerpe
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgzerpesa1.html
    --
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgreligiousfreedomwatch.org
    --

    Report
  2. Nfowli
    Archived post
    #2
    Quoted message said:

    The dangers inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs highlights the importance of the
    individual's interest in avoiding forced treatment. These medications can produce debilitating,
    life- altering and even fatal side-effects. Thus, they bear no resemblance to much less intrusive
    medical interventions which courts have detennined implicate only a minimal liberty interest. See
    Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 771 (pin [censored] of finger for a blood test). Indeed, the risks and extent of
    that inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs to pretrial detainees are at least as
    serious as those which the Court has previously held to outweigh the government's interests. See
    Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753,755- 56 (1985) (surgical removal of a bullet); Rochin v. California,
    342 U.S. 165,172 (1952) (forced insertion of a stomach pump). The use of chemical agents to alter
    one's mind and to potentially affect one's muscular and other bodily functions is at least as
    invasive as the mechanical invasion of surgery. The pre-trial detainee's interest in avoiding the
    administration of these dangerous and potentially life-threatening drugs should not be infringed
    unless the government's action is the least restrictive means by which it may accomplish a
    compelling interest.

    When those drugs harm pre-trail detainees, it will also harm the private person. Look at Dave
    Rice. He is swallowing such stuff and recommending it to others over and over again. Then he posts
    stuff like suggesting to kill members of the FBI and claims later he can't remember that anymore.
    Terrible what those drugs do to you!

    Psychiatrists attempt to get the patient/victim to sign a legal waiver. Tells you something about
    there treatment. Psychiatric medication with antipsychotics is like a slow chemical lobotomy of the
    entire brain. The administrators and departments of health, professors and such are into this huge
    medical malpractise and fraud. To a large extent psychiatrists are stooges in this medical
    euthanasia. If a few of the patients/victims would cotton on to this there would be a whole run of
    murder suicides in psychiatric clinics, hospitals, wards.

    Report
  3. Martha H Adams
    Archived post
    #3

    I wonder if this person who provides us his expert advice, has ever actually sat down and interacted
    with a few of those people who he says, should never allow....

    I think a few years of volunteer experience and maybe a little therapy work thrown in, would
    significantly improve his thinking. Maybe he'd do shorter messages too.

    Cheers -- Martha Adams

    Report
  4. Quaoar
    Archived post
    #4
    nfowli said:
    Quoted message said:

    The dangers inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs highlights the importance of
    the individual's interest in avoiding forced treatment. These medications can produce
    debilitating, life- altering and even fatal side-effects. Thus, they bear no resemblance to much
    less intrusive medical interventions which courts have detennined implicate only a minimal
    liberty interest. See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 771 (pin [censored] of finger for a blood test). Indeed,
    the risks and extent of that inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs to pretrial
    detainees are at least as serious as those which the Court has previously held to outweigh the
    government's interests. See Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753,755- 56
    (1985) (surgical removal of a bullet); Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165,172 (1952) (forced
    insertion of a stomach pump). The use of chemical agents to alter one's mind and to
    potentially affect one's muscular and other bodily functions is at least as invasive as
    the mechanical invasion of surgery. The pre-trial detainee's interest in avoiding the
    administration of these dangerous and potentially life-threatening drugs should not be
    infringed unless the government's action is the least restrictive means by which it may
    accomplish a compelling interest.

    When those drugs harm pre-trail detainees, it will also harm the private person. Look at Dave
    Rice. He is swallowing such stuff and recommending it to others over and over again. Then he
    posts stuff like suggesting to kill members of the FBI and claims later he can't remember that
    anymore. Terrible what those drugs do to you!

    Psychiatrists attempt to get the patient/victim to sign a legal waiver. Tells you something about
    there treatment. Psychiatric medication with antipsychotics is like a slow chemical lobotomy of
    the entire brain. The administrators and departments of health, professors and such are into this
    huge medical malpractise and fraud. To a large extent psychiatrists are stooges in this medical
    euthanasia. If a few of the patients/victims would cotton on to this there would be a whole run of
    murder suicides in psychiatric clinics, hospitals, wards.

    You are sadly either totally misinformed, making this up, or a complete loon. It makes no difference
    to me, the end result is the same: your exposition is complete lunacy.

    Q

    Report
  5. Nomen Nescio
    Archived post
    #5

    In article <[email hidden]>

    (nfowli) said:

    Psychiatrists attempt to get the patient/victim to sign a legal waiver. Tells you something about
    there treatment.

    You can't get so much as a tonsillectomy without a waiver. So do without medical treatment entirely.
    Please. It will be one less moron, which is a good thing.

    Report
  6. Orkeltatte@Hotm
    Archived post
    #6

    [email hidden] (nfowli) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Psychiatrists attempt to get the patient/victim to sign a legal waiver. Tells you something about
    there treatment. Psychiatric medication with antipsychotics is like a slow chemical lobotomy of
    the entire brain. The administrators and departments of health, professors and such are into this
    huge medical malpractise and fraud. To a large extent psychiatrists are stooges in this medical
    euthanasia. If a few of the patients/victims would cotton on to this there would be a whole run of
    murder suicides in psychiatric clinics, hospitals, wards.

    Get back on medication ASAP. You are suffering from paranoic delusions. Barb is a lost case to
    humanity , but for you there might be some hope.

    And by the way, next time you feel like throwing accusations around, please do your homework - get
    the facts - and mayby you will find somebody that actually would listen to what you are saying.

    Orkeltatte The real thing

    Report
  7. The Only True B
    Archived post
    #7

    [email hidden] (nfowli) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The dangers inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs highlights the importance of
    the individual's interest in avoiding forced treatment. These medications can produce
    debilitating, life- altering and even fatal side-effects. Thus, they bear no resemblance to much
    less intrusive medical interventions which courts have detennined implicate only a minimal
    liberty interest. See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 771 (pin [censored] of finger for a blood test). Indeed,
    the risks and extent of that inherent in the administration of antipsychotic drugs to pretrial
    detainees are at least as serious as those which the Court has previously held to outweigh the
    government's interests. See Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753,755- 56 (1985) (surgical removal of a
    bullet); Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165,172 (1952) (forced insertion of a stomach pump). The
    use of chemical agents to alter one's mind and to potentially affect one's muscular and other
    bodily functions is at least as invasive as the mechanical invasion of surgery. The pre-trial
    detainee's interest in avoiding the administration of these dangerous and potentially life-
    threatening drugs should not be infringed unless the government's action is the least
    restrictive means by which it may accomplish a compelling interest.

    When those drugs harm pre-trail detainees, it will also harm the private person. Look at Dave
    Rice. He is swallowing such stuff and recommending it to others over and over again. Then he
    posts stuff like suggesting to kill members of the FBI and claims later he can't remember that
    anymore. Terrible what those drugs do to you!

    Psychiatrists attempt to get the patient/victim to sign a legal waiver. Tells you something about
    there treatment. Psychiatric medication with antipsychotics is like a slow chemical lobotomy of
    the entire brain. The administrators and departments of health, professors and such are into this
    huge medical malpractise and fraud. To a large extent psychiatrists are stooges in this medical
    euthanasia. If a few of the patients/victims would cotton on to this there would be a whole run of
    murder suicides in psychiatric clinics, hospitals, wards.

    You know what, Nfowli, you are right. Hospitals and doctors ask the patients to fill our an enormous
    amount of paper work to protect them from legal actions. But Dave Touretzky and Peter Alexander and
    their fanatical friends try to steal the rights of Scientologists signing a waiver against
    psychiatric treatments.

    Otherswise, the detrimental effects of antipsychotic drugs alter the patient's thought processes and
    ability to think and reason. (No wonder so many posters post wild illogical text!)

    The fact that antipsychotic drugs are intended to benefit a patient (and I personally doubt that
    they were developed with good intentions) by restoring "normal" thought processes should not reduce
    the level of scrutiny where the government seeks to forcibly administer these agents. As Justice
    Brandeis warned in Olmstead v.U.S., 277 U.S. 438,479 (1928) (Brandeis, J., Concurring):

    Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes
    are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-
    minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-
    meaning but without understanding.

    More recently, several members of this Court have affirmed that judicial scrutiny of government's
    intrusion on individuals' rights is not lessened merely because the government asserts benevolent
    motives. In Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 226 (1995), this Court held that
    strict scrutiny applies to racial classifications by the government even where the racial
    classification is "benign." Justice Thomas dismissed the notion that any lesser standard of review
    should be applied to actions which the government claimed were well-meaning:

    That these programs have been motivated, in part, by good intentions cannot provide refuge from the
    principle thatunder our Constitution, the government may not make distinctions on the basis of race.

    Adarand Constructors, 515 U.S. at 240 (Thomas, J., concurring). Several years earlier, Justice
    O'Connor, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia and Kennedy, criticized the Court's
    lesser standard of review for "benign racial classifications," stating, "the Court's emphasis on
    'benign racial classifications' suggests confidence in its ability to distinguish good from harmful
    uses of racial criteria. History should teach greater humility." Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC,
    497 U.S. 547,609 (1990) (O'Connor, J., dissenting). See also Mississippi Univ.for Women v. Hogan,
    458 U.S. 718, 723 (1982) (That a statute discriminated against males rather than females "does not
    exempt it from scrutiny or reduce the standard of review."😉

    Moreover, lowering the bar for the government to forcibly administer mind-altering drugs to an
    individual where it does so to "restore normalcy" would require courts to make the historically
    elusive and dubious distinction between normal and abnormal thoughts. What constitutes normal mental
    processes is necessarily subjective and changes over time. No objective definition of normalcy can
    be identified by which courts can differentiate between well-intended and ill-intended forced
    injections of individuals with antipsychotic medications. For example, as recently as the late
    1980's Soviet psychiatrists used antipsychotic medication to "treat" individuals for "delusions of
    reformism" and "anti-Soviet thoughts." Richard J. Bonnie & Svetlana v. Polubinskaya, Unraveling
    Soviet Psychiatry, 10 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 279, 282-83 (1999). Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200,207
    (1927) with Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535,541 (1942) (criticizing rationale of Buck). In view of
    the jurisprudential lessons of history in this area, the Court should avoid making itself the final
    arbiter for what are normal or abnormal thoughts. Such would come perilously close to the government
    prescribed orthodoxy of thought that this Court refuted in West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624,
    642 (1943).

    Well what does this mean? It means that the posters that scream that a person should take anti-
    psychotic medicine, as they don't agree with her views and opinions, is at heart and mind nothing
    but an old and moldy Soviet, a communist, as invented by the Germans.

    Barbara Schwarz (the only real one)

    P.S. Postings with e-mail address [email hidden] and identities "Barbara_Schwarz",
    "the real Barbara Schwarz de Rothschild" and "Truth Speaker 2" are not done by me. Those are
    forgeries of criminal, Aids infected, gay lunatic Garry Lynn Scarff who is a fanatical Dave
    Touretzky defender. Scarff persecutes me from thread to thread often using my name as identity
    for those crimes (!) and

    tries to intimidate me, libels, insults and lies about me. He also lied that he spoke to a roomate
    of mine in the Utah mental health hospital. I never was in that hospital, but he probably escaped
    from one. Scarff is active member of the gay WeHo "church", that according to Scarff applaudes
    Scarffs lawless behavior against me. An ex-WeHo member wrote me that this "church" sanctions and
    promotes dishonorable behavior and that he and his friends were raped and drugged by one of their
    active members, and that one of their active members murdered others under the guise of "drug
    overdose". The ex-WeHo wrote that the

    doesn't see what's wrong with that.

    Frederic Rice, another fierce David Touretzky defender, posted also with the stolen identity de
    Rothschild. He is as little a de Rothschild as a dirty slimy and greasy punch bag is an impressive
    man. He threatened governmental officials over the Internet, wants to celebrate when both President
    Bush's are dead and has tips on his website on how to kill bikers.

    His brother David Rice, posts with "Dr." or "Reverend" Desertphile and also with the stolen identity
    de Rothschild. He suggested to kill members of the FBI. (Go to www.religiousfreedom.watch.org, the
    extremist pages on David Touretzky, page 9, his connections and click on the PDF file.) Dave Rice
    also posted a long time with the identity "Prozac filled gay terrorist psycho", which tells a lot
    about him.

    Barbara Graham Warr, self-proclaimed "caplain" of the A.R.S. newsgroup and snakepit, another David
    Touretzky promoter, is a DUI offender and pleaded guilty to possession and manufacturing of
    prohibited weapon under California penal code. She congratulated the WeHo "congregation" accepting
    Scarff's criminal behaviors against me. However, she posted before that there is no God. She also
    posts with stolen identity de Rothschild. - For more, click on the below links.

    ----------------------------------------------
    Linda Anderson religiousfreedomwatch.organdersenl1.html Gerald Armstrong
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgarmstrong1.html Jim Beebe
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgbeebej1.html Graham Berry
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgberry.html David Bird
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgbirdd1.html Tory Christman
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgchristmant4.html Ursula Caberta
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcaberta.html Ida Camburn
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcamburn1.html Joe Cisar
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcisarj1.html Robert Clark
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgclark1.html Elizabeth Ann Cox
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgcoxea1.html Mark Dallara
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgdallara1.html Alexander Dvorkin
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgdvorkin1.html Valerie Emanuel
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgemanuelv1.html Steven Fishman
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgfishman1.html Vickki Ford Cook
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgfordv1.html Phil Georgi
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgjacobsen6.html Scott Goehring
    religiousfreedomwatch.orggoehrings1.html Roger Gonnet
    religiousfreedomwatch.orggonnet1.html Barbara Graham
    religiousfreedomwatch.orggraham1.html Gregg Hagglund
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghagglund1.html Steve Hassan
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghassan1.html Tilman Hausherr
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghauser1.html Andreas Heldal-Lund
    religiousfreedomwatch.orglund1.html Keith Henson
    religiousfreedomwatch.orghenson1.html Deana Holmes
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgholmes1.html Jeff Jacobsen
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgjacobsen1.html Patrick Jost
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgjost1.html Charlotte Kates
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgkatesc1.html Rod Keller
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgkeller1.html Steven Kent
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgkent1.html Arnie Lerma
    religiousfreedomwatch.orglerma1.html Joe Lynn
    religiousfreedomwatch.orglynn1.html Ted Mayett
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgmayett1.html Frank Oliver
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgoliver.html Kady O'Malley
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgomalley1.html Zenon Panoussis
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpanoussis1.html Ted Patrick
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpatrick1.html Michael Pattinson
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpattinsonm1.html Robert Peterson
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpeterson1.html Bruce/Kathleen Pettycrew
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgpettycrew.html Jesse Prince
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgprince1.html Roland Rashleigh-Berry
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgrashleighb1.html David Rice
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgriced.html Fred Rice
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgricef.html Rick Ross
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgrossr1.html Karin Spaink
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgspaink1.html David Touretzky
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgtouretzky1.html Alan Walter
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgwalter1.html Grady Ward
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgward.html Johan Wevers
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgweversj1.html Hana/Jerry Whitfield
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgwhitfield1.html Larry Wollersheim
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgwollersheim1.html Sten-Arne Zerpe
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgzerpesa1.html
    --
    religiousfreedomwatch.orgreligiousfreedomwatch.org
    --

    Report
  8. Ria
    Archived post
    #8
    Quoted message said:

    Get back on medication ASAP. You are suffering from paranoic delusions. Barb is a lost case to
    humanity , but for you there might be some hope.

    And by the way, next time you feel like throwing accusations around, please do your homework - get
    the facts - and mayby you will find somebody that actually would listen to what you are saying.

    Orkelltatte, I believe you just accused a person without doing your homework.

    you told a stranger s/he had what describe as paranoic delusions.

    without living with them. without having a relationship of any kind with them. without even sitting
    down and talking with them.

    Report

Related discussions

Closely matching published threads from General fitness, health and nutrition.

01(WWW.SNEAKERS-WHOLESALE.COM) CHEAP Air force one JORDAN,NIKE SHOES,air force one,air jordan low pric 0 replies · 127 views02On Topic: The Taliban Would Never Have Allowed This ... 0 replies · 183 views03Don't try to force psychiatric treatments upon anybody.... 2 replies · 525 views04nike air force one womens boots ( www.discount-jordans.com ) 0 replies · 451 views05Re: Whites NEVER COMPLAIN about CHEATING CHUCKERS Andrew Flilntoff and Brett Lee 0 replies · 812 views06wholesale air force ones sneakers,jordans sneakers,prada +guccisneakers for cheap price 1 reply · 455 views

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionGeneral fitness, health and nutrition Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.