Road Cycling · Public discussion

new tires

Started by di · · Last activity · 25 posts · 1,161 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 September 2005
Last activity
8 October 2005
Original author
di
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,161
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–25 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Bill said:
    Quoted message said:


    Hey Genuis, did you click on the link I provided? Nortons are still
    being made too, but finding a dealer could be more difficult.
    http://www.nortonmotorcycles.com/

    I'm trying to say, that the Japanese didn't put the all the British
    motorcycle companies out of business. I'm saying that as usual, you
    don't know what you are talking about.

    You said that you would buy a Triumph, if you could find one. " Ever
    tried to buy a British motorcycle lately? I would but can't since the
    Asian's have put just about everybody out of business."

    I showed you that Triumphs are still made and I gave you a link as to
    where dealers in California are located, so are you going to buy one?
    http://www.triumph.co.uk/usa/5.aspx

    If anyone's head is up their ass, it would be you. You post a false
    statement and when corrected, you want to make it about me.

    Life is Good!
    Jeff

    Try looking at the history, fellow genius?
    http://www.nortonmotorcycles.com/company/history.asp
    They went under in 1976, just like I said, and for the reason I said.
    Beezers are history, period, and Triumph probably went down to a 2 man
    company before getting refinanced. Looking at their home page 2 out of
    the three look an awful lot like Japanese bikes and even the third looks
    like a 30 year old design with some fiberglass junk on it.
    I'm not the stupid one here, you just can't interpret what has been
    going on.
    Bill (use monosyllables when talking to Jeff) Baka

    It's real simple little bill, you said you couldn't buy a new British
    motorcycle, I proved you wrong. All the history has nothing to do with
    your original statement. Sure the whole British motorcycle industry,
    just about disappeared, but it is back.

    Are you going to buy one, you said you would? No, of course not. So,
    I guess were talking out of your ass again.

    I've made my point.

    Life is Good!
    Jeff

  2. Bill said:

    I'm not the stupid one here,

    The stupid ones never do realize they're the stupid ones.


  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Performance, Nashbar, Pricepoint, etc., have scads of excellent tires for half
    that or less. There's no reason to pay $40.00 for a bicycle tire.

    Hmm, love to see a recommendation for a sub-$40 tire which meets the
    following requirements:

    1) 25mm width
    2) rated for 120 psi
    3) Good cut resistance
    4) OK for use on tandem

    Chris Neary
    [email hidden]

    "Science, freedom, beauty, adventure: what more could
    you ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I
    loved" - Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh

    OK,
    I admit I would like a Kevlar bullet proof tire rated for 120 PSI
    minimum, but why use them on a tandem?

    25mm is about the widest that will fit the dual-pivot brakes

    Quoted message said:

    That is a lot of weight to put on 2 tiny tires. A tandem with
    27" x 1 3/8" makes more sense to me, but of course nobody
    ever agrees with me about things like that, so....

    We'll, if the brakes would allow the use of wider tires, we'd have to lower
    the tire pressure (basic pressure vessel physics), losing some (small amount
    of) energy to hysterisis loss.

    The 25mm's I'm running right now handle quite nicely.

    Chris Neary
    [email hidden]

    Chris & Tracey
    1999 Co-Motion Speedster

  4. Rich said:
    Bill said:

    I'm not the stupid one here,

    The stupid ones never do realize they're the stupid ones.

    No, I do know about you. If I say grass is green you will tell me that
    it is blue because I didn't research it.
    Bill

  5. jj said:


    Guy at the LBS tried to sell me new tires, saying the folded type with
    kevlar bead was better and lighter than the type with metal beads.

    True, or false? $45 bucks vs $25 for regular hanging (non-foldable) tires.

    (The folded ones were not slicks, but had ///// type tread on either side
    of the center line, but the tread was much closer and tigher than the above
    representation. He said they had better traction, but I'm dubious.)

    You should be dubious of the tread claims. Tread does nothing for a bike
    tire except give you a wear indicator (which you don't need; replace the
    tire at the first sign of cord showing through). As far as kevlar/wire
    bead goes, yes, kevlar-bead tires tend to be lighter. Better? Not
    really, but they work OK. If 30g of weight is worth $20 to you, do it.
    If not, look around, and you can find slick folding tires for $20 or so.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | Some people used to claim that, if enough monkeys sat in front
    _`\(,_ | of enough typewriters and typed long enough, eventually one of
    (_)/ (_) | them would reproduce the collected works of Shakespeare. The
    internet has proven this not to be the case.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.