General fitness, health and nutrition ยท Public discussion

NYNY - Fred - Dec 10th

Started by Fred ยท ยท Last activity ยท 91 posts ยท 1,559 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 December 2003
Last activity
26 January 2004
Original author
Fred
Posts
91
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,559
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41โ€“60 of 91
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. that is excellent news, Lee
    Lesanne <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food


    reward.

    Quoted message said:

    I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I can


    go

    Quoted message said:

    to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of this year on my card. But my
    goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155 and


    160

    Quoted message said:

    so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive reinforcement for
    staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    ya.

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You're right, of course.

    I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...

    I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the
    scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not
    substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady and
    feeling good.

    This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition. No
    little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.

    Just musing............

    krys said:

    hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    it's all about how you


    feel

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than


    you

    Quoted message said:

    do.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to


    lose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that weight for me..........


  2. I love the part about being there (at goal) and feeling great. Oh, and the new low is definitely
    good news too. You totally rock, Lesanne!

    Prairie Roots

    Lesanne said:

    This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food reward. I am 156 on my scale
    this morning and was frankly delighted because I can go to the meeting this morning and get a nice
    low weight for the end of this year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155
    and 160 so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive
    reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta tell ya.

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You're right, of course.

    I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...

    I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of weightloss
    - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a
    loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the
    "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady and feeling good.

    This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition. No
    little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.

    Just musing............

    krys said:

    hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    it's all about how you


    feel

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than you


    do.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to


    lose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that weight for me..........


  3. Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)

    I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And just
    accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.

    And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of reward
    - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.

    I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)

    Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last week!!!!!

    Lesanne said:

    This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food reward. I am 156 on my scale
    this morning and was frankly delighted because I can go to the meeting this morning and get a nice
    low weight for the end of this year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155
    and 160 so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive
    reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta tell ya.

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You're right, of course.

    I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...

    I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of weightloss
    - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a
    loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the
    "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady and feeling good.

    This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition. No
    little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.

    Just musing............

    krys said:

    hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    it's all about how you


    feel

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than you


    do.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to


    lose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that weight for me..........


  4. Oh, I forgot to congratulate you on the new low and loss. Great guns.

    Lesanne said:

    This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food reward. I am 156 on my scale
    this morning and was frankly delighted because I can go to the meeting this morning and get a nice
    low weight for the end of this year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155
    and 160 so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive
    reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta tell ya.

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You're right, of course.

    I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...

    I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of weightloss
    - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a
    loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the
    "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady and feeling good.

    This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition. No
    little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.

    Just musing............

    krys said:

    hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    it's all about how you


    feel

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than you


    do.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to


    lose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that weight for me..........


  5. Great job Lesanne! You should be very proud!

    "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food


    reward.

    Quoted message said:

    I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I can


    go

    Quoted message said:

    to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of this year on my card. But my
    goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155 and


    160

    Quoted message said:

    so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive reinforcement for
    staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    ya.

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You're right, of course.

    I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...

    I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the
    scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not
    substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady and
    feeling good.

    This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition. No
    little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.

    Just musing............

    krys said:

    hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    it's all about how you


    feel

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than


    you

    Quoted message said:

    do.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to


    lose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that weight for me..........


  6. I'm beginning to think *no* to the temperature adjustment question. I stated my concerns to my
    doctor last year, he laughed at me and told me to give it some time for my body to adjust to the
    lesser weight. Well, it's been 10 months now and I'm still freezing! I am currently sitting in my
    jeans, t-shirt, heavy sweater AND bathrobe ... house toasty warm at 72. But not me. On the plus
    side, the 95+ days of the summer didn't bother me at all. <g>

    Joyce

    Brenda Hammond said:

    A year ago I was still in tops with short sleeves, blouses, t-shirts, etc. Now I'm wearing
    sweaters, fleece, sweatshirst, etc. I'm cold all the time! I wonder if our bodies will ever adjust,
    so that we don't feel the cold so much?
    --
    Brenda
    209/174/150 NYNY goal 160

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I am waiting for the power failure - not really - that is one aspect of being thinner - I am
    running colder. I probably should rev up the metabolism by doing weights for the upper body.

  7. Yes, looking better than that one day luncheon was leading me to believe. We shall see in
    about an hour.

    Joyce said:

    I'll bet you surprise yourself tomorrow .. probably not snacking tonite and system will be running
    on empty tomorrow morning. <G> I think I'm in the same boat though, finally did have time to hit
    the scale this morning - weight up just a teeny bit ... but still up. Well under my danger zone,
    but .... you know. Oh well, like I said earlier ... I'm going to try to lighten up a bit over the
    holidays and just enjoy the season. I'm still well below goal, and below my danger zone. The brief
    stint in the 120's was fun though. <G>

    Joyce

    Fred said:

    Yes - that is exactly what she was suggesting - where will I find the final cushion if I want to
    keep the "above cushion."

    I think 155-160 will be it. And tomorrow should be closer to the 160, I fear.

    Joyce said:

    Congrats on yet another more than successful week! Looks like you and Lesanne are really getting
    into this friendly competition thing. <G>

    I do have to agree with your sister, based on my own observances with my weight goals. I thought
    150 would make me happy ... then needed the cushion with my personal goal of 140 ... which
    resulted in another cushion to be able to keep the 140 cushion, so 135 it was. Now I'm working on
    a cushion for 135 and have begun to see there could be no end to this logic. I have no idea why,
    but last week the number 125 jumped into my head. I've quickly slapped it away ... but
    .............

    Time for me to stop over analyzing things. <G>

    Joyce

    On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:12:05 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >Okay here we go:
    >
    >I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds
    >
    > (that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
    > wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
    > chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!
    >
    >Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)
    >
    >But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had
    >a weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have
    >a sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want
    >to move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth
    >and ...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)
    >
    >(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)
    >
    >
    >Fred
    >219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

  8. There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance people.
    Like people who are abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get
    little "stuff" for staying that way for some months, or years or whatever.
    I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than 2 years
    your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after 5
    years, like remission from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it off.
    So the rewards should be for time. And I think also, that Food rewards
    should be a thing of the past. I think food, (don't get me wrong, I am
    talking Good food) should be for nutrition and fuel. Not for rewards for
    anything, unless it is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to
    actually get physically hungry! I never used to get physically hungry,
    always ate to keep from being that way. And boy is food bliss, when it
    feeds actual hunger.
    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)

    I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And just
    accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.

    And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.

    I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)

    Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    week!!!!!

    Lesanne said:

    This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food


    reward.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I can


    go

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of this year on my card. But my
    goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155 and


    160

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive reinforcement
    for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta


    tell

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ya.

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You're right, of course.

    I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...

    I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the
    scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not
    substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady and
    feeling good.

    This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition. No
    little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.

    Just musing............

    On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    >it's all about how


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    feel

    Quoted message said:

    >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    do.

    Quoted message said:

    >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to


    lose

    Quoted message said:

    >that weight for me..........

  9. Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would expect
    that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to work for
    them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did buy
    it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food reward is not
    necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should be able to fit them
    in to the program.

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with (we
    turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we discussed
    how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was needed - was the
    scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the crutch or need for reward
    as opposed to it's the right thing.

    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get attention,
    I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still attention?????
    And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started losing) - my friends
    knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that "reward" too???

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    Lesanne said:

    There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance people. Like people who are
    abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for staying that way for some
    months, or years or whatever. I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than 2
    years your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after 5 years, like
    remission from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it off. So the rewards should be for time.
    And I think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the past. I think food, (don't get me
    wrong, I am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and fuel. Not for rewards for anything,
    unless it is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically hungry! I never
    used to get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy is food bliss, when
    it feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)

    I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And just
    accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.

    And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.

    I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)

    Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    week!!!!!

    Lesanne said:

    This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food


    reward.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I can


    go

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of this year on my card. But
    my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155 and


    160

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive reinforcement
    for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta


    tell

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ya.

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > You're right, of course.
    >
    > I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    >
    > I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    > weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the
    > scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not
    > substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady and
    > feeling good.
    >
    > This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    > wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition.
    > No little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    >
    > Just musing............
    >
    > On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    > >it's all about how


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    feel
    > >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    do.
    > >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to
    lose
    > >that weight for me..........
    >


  10. Seattle, WA.

    Anglea Woollcombe said:

    where r u from fred angie "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've taken to wearing sheepskin slippers. Nice and fuzzy on the inside,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    at least my feet are warm. Sometimes have to even put socks on under them as my ankles get cold!
    Our climate is cooler, but I've never felt so cold and I've lived here all my life. I'm looking
    forward to the warmer weather in spring and summer....

    "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Brenda me too, my feet are Always cold.! And it is not a cold climate


    here,

    Quoted message said:

    as I am sure I have mentioned .. "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...
    > A year ago I was still in tops with short sleeves, blouses, t-shirts,


    etc.

    Quoted message said:

    > Now I'm wearing sweaters, fleece, sweatshirst, etc. I'm cold all the
    time!
    > I wonder if our bodies will ever adjust, so that we don't feel the


    cold

    Quoted message said:

    so

    Quoted message said:

    > much?
    > --
    > Brenda
    > 209/174/150 NYNY goal 160
    >
    > "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > "]news:[email hidden]...
    > > Yes, I am waiting for the power failure - not really - that is one aspect of being thinner
    > > - I am running colder. I probably should


    rev

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > up the metabolism by doing weights for the upper body.
    > >
    > > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:51:03 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > >Wow Fred! You're doing a wonderful job and that clothing allowance


    is

    Quoted message said:

    > > >getting bigger, soon you'll be able to really bundle up when at
    meetings.
    > > >Congratulations!!
    > > >
    > > >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > > >"]news:[email hidden]...
    > > >> Okay here we go:
    > > >>
    > > >> I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds
    > > >>
    > > >> (that is using my base clothing measurements which means


    removing

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    1.6
    > > >> pounds from the current wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the
    > > >> heavier clothing. So I guess the chocolate


    cake

    Quoted message said:

    > > >> on Sat night was not deadly - YES!
    > > >>
    > > >> Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)
    > > >>
    > > >> But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue
    (she,
    > > >> by the way has never had a weight problem other than being UNDER


    most

    Quoted message said:

    > > >> of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a sufficient clothing cushion. She
    > > >> suggested as some of us have discussed


    then

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you
    > > >> will not want to move much from there and will try being just a


    bit

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > >> lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and ...... Which is


    what

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > >> I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)
    > > >>
    > > >> (aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the
    points
    > > >> (gd&r)
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > >> Fred
    > > >> 219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
    > > >>
    > > >
    > >
    >
    >



  11. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    Hee hee. Not me honey, I am not wasting any points on Any of that.

    Quoted message said:


    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would
    expect that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to
    work for them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    Yeah, WW offered me a thing to apply for a job. I declined. ๐Ÿ™‚ My leader wants me to, but I am still
    thinking about sending the info to the WW magazine. I may do it. Maybe. Next year.

    Quoted message said:

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Well, I would be SO rewarded then ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚

    Quoted message said:

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did
    buy it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food reward
    is not necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should be able to
    fit them in to the program.

    Yes, I fit my favorite treats into the program. I have had some kind of ice cream every night for
    the last year I bet. Just lately I changed from having a whole cup of the light ice cream, to a
    small cone of the real stuff. It is Better, the smaller, real stuff.

    Quoted message said:

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with
    (we turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we
    discussed how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was needed
    - was the scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the crutch or need
    for reward as opposed to it's the right thing.

    I thought about this a lot when I first got to goal, because I was kind of let down or something.
    Now that I am officially in the one fives at my meeting I really feel done, and I feel kind of
    different about it.

    Quoted message said:


    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get
    attention, I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still
    attention????? And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started
    losing) - my friends knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that
    "reward" too???

    Yes!. Already I am getting way less attention. Now if I was a meeting leader I could bring in my old
    pictures of me at 365 and have constant attention. Hmmm. Funny though, I think I stayed "sort of"
    heavy (the between years) in the 200's because it made me feel invisible in a way. Nobody wants to
    look at a heavy woman. Or not much anyway.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    Lesanne said:

    There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance


    people.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Like people who are abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for
    staying that way for some months, or years or


    whatever.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than 2


    years

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after 5 years, like remission
    from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it off. So the rewards should be for time. And I
    think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the past. I think food, (don't get me wrong, I
    am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and fuel. Not for rewards for anything, unless it
    is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically hungry! I never used to
    get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy is food bliss, when it
    feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)

    I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And
    just accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.

    And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.

    I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)

    Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    week!!!!!

    On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:19:46 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food


    reward.

    Quoted message said:

    >I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I


    can

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    go

    Quoted message said:

    >to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of


    this

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    160

    Quoted message said:

    >so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >positive reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    >ya.
    >
    >
    >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >> You're right, of course.
    >>
    >> I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    >>
    >> I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    >> weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for


    food,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time
    >> when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food
    >> reward. The


    reward

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> should be holding steady and feeling good.
    >>
    >> This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    >> wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition.
    >> No little stars


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    >>
    >> Just musing............
    >>
    >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue
    >> >- it's all about how


    you

    Quoted message said:

    >feel
    >> >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different


    than

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you

    Quoted message said:

    >do.
    >> >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >lose
    >> >that weight for me..........
    >>
    >

  12. this all indicates that my musings about coping mechanisms is closer to the
    truth than I would like to think, Lee
    Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would
    expect that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to
    work for them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did
    buy it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food reward
    is not necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should be able to
    fit them in to the program.

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with
    (we turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we
    discussed how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was needed
    - was the scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the crutch or need
    for reward as opposed to it's the right thing.

    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get
    attention, I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still
    attention????? And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started
    losing) - my friends knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that
    "reward" too???

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    Lesanne said:

    There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance


    people.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Like people who are abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for
    staying that way for some months, or years or


    whatever.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than 2


    years

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after 5 years, like remission
    from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it off. So the rewards should be for time. And I
    think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the past. I think food, (don't get me wrong, I
    am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and fuel. Not for rewards for anything, unless it
    is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically hungry! I never used to
    get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy is food bliss, when it
    feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)

    I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And
    just accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.

    And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.

    I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)

    Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    week!!!!!

    On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:19:46 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food


    reward.

    Quoted message said:

    >I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I


    can

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    go

    Quoted message said:

    >to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of


    this

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    160

    Quoted message said:

    >so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >positive reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    >ya.
    >
    >
    >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >> You're right, of course.
    >>
    >> I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    >>
    >> I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    >> weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for


    food,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time
    >> when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food
    >> reward. The


    reward

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> should be holding steady and feeling good.
    >>
    >> This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    >> wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition.
    >> No little stars


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    >>
    >> Just musing............
    >>
    >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue
    >> >- it's all about how


    you

    Quoted message said:

    >feel
    >> >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different


    than

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you

    Quoted message said:

    >do.
    >> >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >lose
    >> >that weight for me..........
    >>
    >

  13. On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:38:44 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    Yes, stay thin and switch to booze. There's a support group for that too. Or you could spend a month
    in Minnesota at one of our 10000 treatment centers to recover from all those rewards <G>

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would
    expect that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to work
    for them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did
    buy it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food reward
    is not necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should be able to
    fit them in to the program.

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with (we
    turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we discussed
    how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was needed - was the
    scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the crutch or need for reward
    as opposed to it's the right thing.

    One of topics that used to come rather frequently in OA was whether it was possible to be addicted
    to the scale. (OA recommends monthly WIs because of the tendency to weigh obsessively.) Some people
    were uncomfortable with the notion of replacing one addiction for another. Others decided that as
    long as the replacement wasn't as lethal as the original, they were fine with it.

    The idea of scale addiction might be stretching the definition of addiction a bit far. But I've met
    lots of people who ended in OA after getting sober in AA. They switched addictions. We all know
    people who turned to food to curb their nicotine cravings when giving up the smoking habit.

    Quoted message said:

    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get
    attention, I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still
    attention????? And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started
    losing) - my friends knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that
    "reward" too???

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    It's a good topic even if there isn't one definitive answer that applies universally. But I think
    the reason any of us remains overweight long after we acknowledge it as a problem is that there were
    secondary, hidden needs for our obesity that won out over reason. When those secondary gains are
    dealt with, they're no longer obstacles to weight loss. Those secondary needs sometimes find
    expression in another behavior, like exercise. Or newsgroup posting and reading. Or knitting. Or
    drinking. Or spending. Or obsessing about maintaining.

    Oh, was I running on...........? <G>

    Good topic. Keep running on about it. You raise good points that many of us need to think about if
    we're going to keep the weight off.

    Quoted message said:
    Lesanne said:

    There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance people. Like people who are
    abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for staying that way for some
    months, or years or whatever. I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than
    2 years your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after 5 years, like
    remission from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it off. So the rewards should be for time.
    And I think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the past. I think food, (don't get me
    wrong, I am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and fuel. Not for rewards for anything,
    unless it is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically hungry! I
    never used to get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy is food
    bliss, when it feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)

    I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And just
    accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.

    And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.

    I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)

    Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    week!!!!!

    On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:19:46 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food


    reward.

    Quoted message said:

    >I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I can


    go

    Quoted message said:

    >to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of this year on my card. But
    >my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155 and


    160

    Quoted message said:

    >so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive reinforcement
    >for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    >ya.
    >
    >
    >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >> You're right, of course.
    >>
    >> I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    >>
    >> I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    >> weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the
    >> scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not
    >> substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady
    >> and feeling good.
    >>
    >> This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    >> wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition.
    >> No little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    >>
    >> Just musing............
    >>
    >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue -
    >> >it's all about how


    you

    Quoted message said:

    >feel
    >> >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than


    you

    Quoted message said:

    >do.
    >> >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to
    >lose
    >> >that weight for me..........
    >>
    >


    Prairie Roots
    232/168/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

  14. I do not do it without a shirt - well, maybe when I get to the top and have to take off my drenched
    shirt. But it is brief!!!!

    Now, clean up those thoughts! (G)

    Brenda Hammond said:

    Isn't it though? Fred in tight biking shorts, no shirt, rotating arms rapidly in circles....get a
    picture for us!

    "Prairie Roots" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Now that's a vision....

    Fred said:

    I'm getting my "windmill" in shape - rotate arms rapidly in circles....

    Prairie Roots
    232/170.8/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

  15. yeah, obsessing about maintaining. Hoo boy. Ouch. perhaps a grain of truth in there Still. Like the
    exercise, maybe a not so bad addiction.

    "Prairie Roots" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Fred said:

    Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    Yes, stay thin and switch to booze. There's a support group for that too. Or you could spend a
    month in Minnesota at one of our 10000 treatment centers to recover from all those rewards <G>

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would
    expect that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to
    work for them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did
    buy it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food reward
    is not necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should be able
    to fit them in to the program.

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with
    (we turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we
    discussed how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was
    needed - was the scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the crutch
    or need for reward as opposed to it's the right thing.

    One of topics that used to come rather frequently in OA was whether it was possible to be addicted
    to the scale. (OA recommends monthly WIs because of the tendency to weigh obsessively.) Some
    people were uncomfortable with the notion of replacing one addiction for another. Others decided
    that as long as the replacement wasn't as lethal as the original, they were fine with it.

    The idea of scale addiction might be stretching the definition of addiction a bit far. But I've
    met lots of people who ended in OA after getting sober in AA. They switched addictions. We all
    know people who turned to food to curb their nicotine cravings when giving up the smoking habit.

    Quoted message said:

    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get
    attention, I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still
    attention????? And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started
    losing) - my friends knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that
    "reward" too???

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    It's a good topic even if there isn't one definitive answer that applies universally. But I think
    the reason any of us remains overweight long after we acknowledge it as a problem is that there
    were secondary, hidden needs for our obesity that won out over reason. When those secondary gains
    are dealt with, they're no longer obstacles to weight loss. Those secondary needs sometimes find
    expression in another behavior, like exercise. Or newsgroup posting and reading. Or knitting. Or
    drinking. Or spending. Or obsessing about maintaining.

    Oh, was I running on...........? <G>

    Good topic. Keep running on about it. You raise good points that many of us need to think about if
    we're going to keep the weight off.

    Quoted message said:
    Lesanne said:

    There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance


    people.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Like people who are abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for
    staying that way for some months, or years or


    whatever.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than 2


    years

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after


    5

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    years, like remission from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it


    off.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So the rewards should be for time. And I think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the
    past. I think food, (don't get me wrong, I am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and
    fuel. Not for rewards


    for

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    anything, unless it is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically
    hungry! I never used to get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy
    is food bliss, when it feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)
    >
    > I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And
    > just accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.
    >
    > And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    > reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.
    >
    > I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)
    >
    > Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    > week!!!!!
    >
    > On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:19:46 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food
    reward.
    > >I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I


    can

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    go
    > >to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of


    this

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    160
    > >so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >positive reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great,


    gotta

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    tell
    > >ya.
    > >
    > >
    > >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > >"]news:[email hidden]...
    > >> You're right, of course.
    > >>
    > >> I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    > >>
    > >> I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    > >> weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for


    food,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >> itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a
    > >> time when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the "weighloss reward" for the
    > >> food reward. The


    reward

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >> should be holding steady and feeling good.
    > >>
    > >> This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    > >> wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get
    > >> recognition. No little stars


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >> magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    > >>
    > >> Just musing............
    > >>
    > >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue
    > >> >- it's all about


    how

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you
    > >feel
    > >> >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different


    than

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you
    > >do.
    > >> >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still


    want to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >lose
    > >> >that weight for me..........
    > >>
    > >
    >

    Prairie Roots
    232/168/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

  16. On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:02:44 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    Hee hee. Not me honey, I am not wasting any points on Any of that.

    Oh, an occasional Port in a storm (which here would be the whole weekend!!!)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would
    expect that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to
    work for them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    Quoted message said:

    Yeah, WW offered me a thing to apply for a job. I declined. ๐Ÿ™‚ My leader wants me to, but I am
    still thinking about sending the info to the WW magazine. I may do it. Maybe. Next year.

    (sniff) - I was not offered a job. As my secretary noted, working there, she HAS to Maintain.
    Enforced for job security.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Quoted message said:

    Well, I would be SO rewarded then ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚

    Ahhhhhhhhhhh

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did
    buy it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food reward
    is not necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should be able
    to fit them in to the program.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I fit my favorite treats into the program. I have had some kind of ice cream every night for
    the last year I bet. Just lately I changed from having a whole cup of the light ice cream, to a
    small cone of the real stuff. It is Better, the smaller, real stuff.

    Real stuff - no, nada, uh-uh. Not since Tucson when dad was dying.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with
    (we turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we
    discussed how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was
    needed - was the scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the crutch
    or need for reward as opposed to it's the right thing.

    Quoted message said:

    I thought about this a lot when I first got to goal, because I was kind of let down or something.
    Now that I am officially in the one fives at my meeting I really feel done, and I feel kind of
    different about it.

    That's good. You do sound more at ease with it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get
    attention, I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still
    attention????? And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started
    losing) - my friends knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that
    "reward" too???

    Quoted message said:

    Yes!. Already I am getting way less attention. Now if I was a meeting leader I could bring in my
    old pictures of me at 365 and have constant attention. Hmmm. Funny though, I think I stayed "sort
    of" heavy (the between years) in the 200's because it made me feel invisible in a way. Nobody wants
    to look at a heavy woman. Or not much anyway.

    That would be attention getting. I guess, "mid-over weight" is less attention getting than 375.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    Lesanne said:

    There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance


    people.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Like people who are abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for
    staying that way for some months, or years or


    whatever.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than 2


    years

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after 5 years, like remission
    from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it off. So the rewards should be for time. And I
    think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the past. I think food, (don't get me wrong,
    I am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and fuel. Not for rewards for anything, unless
    it is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically hungry! I never
    used to get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy is food bliss,
    when it feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)
    >
    > I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And
    > just accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.
    >
    > And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    > reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.
    >
    > I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)
    >
    > Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    > week!!!!!
    >
    > On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:19:46 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food
    reward.
    > >I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I


    can

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    go
    > >to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of


    this

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    160
    > >so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >positive reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta
    tell
    > >ya.
    > >
    > >
    > >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > >"]news:[email hidden]...
    > >> You're right, of course.
    > >>
    > >> I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    > >>
    > >> I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    > >> weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for


    food,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >> itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a
    > >> time when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the "weighloss reward" for the
    > >> food reward. The


    reward

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >> should be holding steady and feeling good.
    > >>
    > >> This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    > >> wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get
    > >> recognition. No little stars


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >> magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    > >>
    > >> Just musing............
    > >>
    > >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue
    > >> >- it's all about how
    you
    > >feel
    > >> >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different


    than

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you
    > >do.
    > >> >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >lose
    > >> >that weight for me..........
    > >>
    > >
    >


  17. On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:55:47 -0600, in alt.support.diet.weightwatchers

    you said:
    Fred said:

    Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, stay thin and switch to booze. There's a support group for that too. Or you could spend a
    month in Minnesota at one of our 10000 treatment centers to recover from all those rewards <G>

    Oh, that's good - one for each lake (G)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would
    expect that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to
    work for them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did
    buy it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food reward
    is not necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should be able to
    fit them in to the program.

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with
    (we turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we
    discussed how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was needed
    - was the scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the crutch or need
    for reward as opposed to it's the right thing.

    Quoted message said:

    One of topics that used to come rather frequently in OA was whether it was possible to be addicted
    to the scale. (OA recommends monthly WIs because of the tendency to weigh obsessively.) Some people
    were uncomfortable with the notion of replacing one addiction for another. Others decided that as
    long as the replacement wasn't as lethal as the original, they were fine with it.

    Yes, I think a minute, if that on the scale is not a bad addiction or pacifier or whatever.

    Quoted message said:

    The idea of scale addiction might be stretching the definition of addiction a bit far. But I've met
    lots of people who ended in OA after getting sober in AA. They switched addictions. We all know
    people who turned to food to curb their nicotine cravings when giving up the smoking habit.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get
    attention, I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still
    attention????? And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started
    losing) - my friends knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that
    "reward" too???

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    It's a good topic even if there isn't one definitive answer that applies universally. But I think
    the reason any of us remains overweight long after we acknowledge it as a problem is that there
    were secondary, hidden needs for our obesity that won out over reason. When those secondary gains
    are dealt with, they're no longer obstacles to weight loss. Those secondary needs sometimes find
    expression in another behavior, like exercise. Or newsgroup posting and reading. Or knitting. Or
    drinking. Or spending. Or obsessing about maintaining.

    I would agree. (Jared was just on pushing a honey mustard something!)

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, was I running on...........? <G>

    Good topic. Keep running on about it. You raise good points that many of us need to think about if
    we're going to keep the weight off.

    Thanks. At first I was a bit reluctant to post but decided to.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Lesanne said:

    There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance people. Like people who are
    abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for staying that way for some
    months, or years or whatever. I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than
    2 years your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after 5 years, like
    remission from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it off. So the rewards should be for time.
    And I think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the past. I think food, (don't get me
    wrong, I am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and fuel. Not for rewards for anything,
    unless it is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically hungry! I
    never used to get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy is food
    bliss, when it feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)
    >
    > I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And
    > just accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.
    >
    > And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    > reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.
    >
    > I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)
    >
    > Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    > week!!!!!
    >
    > On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:19:46 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food
    reward.
    > >I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I can
    go
    > >to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of this year on my card. But
    > >my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155 and
    160
    > >so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort of positive reinforcement
    > >for staying Still. I sure do feel great, gotta
    tell
    > >ya.
    > >
    > >
    > >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > >"]news:[email hidden]...
    > >> You're right, of course.
    > >>
    > >> I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    > >>
    > >> I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    > >> weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for food, itself. There is that positive glow when the
    > >> scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a time when that is not necessary and I should not
    > >> substitute the "weighloss reward" for the food reward. The reward should be holding steady
    > >> and feeling good.
    > >>
    > >> This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    > >> wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get recognition.
    > >> No little stars or magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    > >>
    > >> Just musing............
    > >>
    > >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the issue
    > >> >- it's all about how
    you
    > >feel
    > >> >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different than
    you
    > >do.
    > >> >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still want to
    > >lose
    > >> >that weight for me..........
    > >>
    > >
    >

    Prairie Roots
    232/168/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

  18. briefs??? hhhmmmm, not boxers??? Lee, snickering and hiding
    Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I do not do it without a shirt - well, maybe when I get to the top and have to take off my
    drenched shirt. But it is brief!!!!

    Now, clean up those thoughts! (G)

    Brenda Hammond said:

    Isn't it though? Fred in tight biking shorts, no shirt, rotating arms rapidly in circles....get a
    picture for us!

    "Prairie Roots" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Now that's a vision....

    On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:57:03 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >I'm getting my "windmill" in shape - rotate arms rapidly in circles....

    Prairie Roots
    232/170.8/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

  19. On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 23:46:48 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Like the exercise, maybe a not so bad addiction.

    That was my point, actually, doing double-duty as a jab. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Quoted message said:

    "Prairie Roots" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Fred said:

    Hey, they could give us booze for a reward (G)

    Yes, stay thin and switch to booze. There's a support group for that too. Or you could spend a
    month in Minnesota at one of our 10000 treatment centers to recover from all those rewards <G>

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if WW actually does anything for Maintainers over time. I will have to ask my
    secretary. I don't know anything about other "abstinance" programs and how they work. I would
    expect that WW might have something but then again, I think people who reach goal either go to
    work for them or possibly fade out of the public program. By the way, has WW offered you a job?

    I guess VIRTUE should be its own reward, huh? (G)

    Well, I do have that chocolate cake and now fruit cake in the freezer and I guess I probably did
    buy it so I could eat it but I'm not sure it was planned as a reward (as you indicate food
    reward is not necessarily a great idea) but more as I want those things on occasion and should
    be able to fit them in to the program.

    This whole thing came to me when I could not hike because of the rain and the friend I was with
    (we turned back at the trailhead before leaving the car) also has a weight problem and so we
    discussed how it is going for me and I just mentioned this reward issue. Wondered if it was
    needed - was the scale my substitute and was that HEALTHY - well, better than food but the
    crutch or need for reward as opposed to it's the right thing.

    One of topics that used to come rather frequently in OA was whether it was possible to be
    addicted to the scale. (OA recommends monthly WIs because of the tendency to weigh obsessively.)
    Some people were uncomfortable with the notion of replacing one addiction for another. Others
    decided that as long as the replacement wasn't as lethal as the original, they were fine with it.

    The idea of scale addiction might be stretching the definition of addiction a bit far. But I've
    met lots of people who ended in OA after getting sober in AA. They switched addictions. We all
    know people who turned to food to curb their nicotine cravings when giving up the smoking habit.

    Quoted message said:

    Some other thoughts have also popped up. Like as we Maintain more, less people will comment
    (congrats or inquiries) and so we get less attention that way (altho, our image might get
    attention, I guess) and while being heavy was not necessarily positive attention, it was still
    attention????? And while I did not look as heavy as I was (given the comments when I started
    losing) - my friends knew and they would express concern about my health. We now lose that
    "reward" too???

    Oh, boy, just running on................

    It's a good topic even if there isn't one definitive answer that applies universally. But I think
    the reason any of us remains overweight long after we acknowledge it as a problem is that there
    were secondary, hidden needs for our obesity that won out over reason. When those secondary gains
    are dealt with, they're no longer obstacles to weight loss. Those secondary needs sometimes find
    expression in another behavior, like exercise. Or newsgroup posting and reading. Or knitting. Or
    drinking. Or spending. Or obsessing about maintaining.

    Oh, was I running on...........? <G>

    Good topic. Keep running on about it. You raise good points that many of us need to think about
    if we're going to keep the weight off.

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:43:01 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >There should be some recognition of Time milestones for maintenance


    people.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >Like people who are abstaining from *substances* for instance, they get little "stuff" for
    >staying that way for some months, or years or


    whatever.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I know I have read that if you maintain a weight loss for more than 2


    years

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >your chances of continuing to keep it off are much improved. And after


    5

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >years, like remission from cancer, you are almost assured to keep it


    off.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >So the rewards should be for time. And I think also, that Food rewards should be a thing of the
    >past. I think food, (don't get me wrong, I am talking Good food) should be for nutrition and
    >fuel. Not for rewards


    for

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >anything, unless it is as a reward for Allowing our healthy bodies to actually get physically
    >hungry! I never used to get physically hungry, always ate to keep from being that way. And boy
    >is food bliss, when it feeds actual hunger. "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >> Yes, it is sane but.. but.. .(sputtering...)
    >>
    >> I need to accept no palpable reward, no visible reward. Just, as you say, "feel great!" And
    >> just accept that as the reward but that is so amorphous.
    >>
    >> And then add to that that MAINTENANCE involves some small gains and that is the antithesis of
    >> reward - downright scary even if I should know it is normal.
    >>
    >> I guess coming to grips with all of this Maintenance stuff is, well, Maintenance (G)
    >>
    >> Finding another reward - I really can't keep upgrading my computer and I got new skis last
    >> week!!!!!
    >>
    >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:19:46 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >This looks very sane to me, this w.l. reward substitute for the food
    >reward.
    >> >I am 156 on my scale this morning and was frankly delighted because I


    can

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >go
    >> >to the meeting this morning and get a nice low weight for the end of


    this

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >year on my card. But my goal, my real goal, is to stay between 155


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >160
    >> >so I am there. I think I am going to need to set myself up some sort


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >positive reinforcement for staying Still. I sure do feel great,


    gotta

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >tell
    >> >ya.
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >> >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >> >> You're right, of course.
    >> >>
    >> >> I've had additional thoughts on this, this afternoon while I was walking the lake...
    >> >>
    >> >> I think that _I_ and maybe some of the others have started to substitute the REWARD of
    >> >> weightloss - seeing the scale drop, for


    food,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >> itself. There is that positive glow when the scale shows a loss. Now, there should be a
    >> >> time when that is not necessary and I should not substitute the "weighloss reward" for the
    >> >> food reward. The


    reward

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >> should be holding steady and feeling good.
    >> >>
    >> >> This is a new thought and (g) not definitely well-thought out just yet. But it did get me
    >> >> wondering. After all, even at WW meetings, Maintainers/Lifetimers no longer get
    >> >> recognition. No little stars


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >> magnets or..... You just plug on along.
    >> >>
    >> >> Just musing............
    >> >>
    >> >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:01:24 -0000, "krys" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> >hey hey hey - down is down - and thus good. and what other people think is never the
    >> >> >issue - it's all about


    how

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >you
    >> >feel
    >> >> >about yourself........and no-one can tell you to feel different


    than

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >you
    >> >do.
    >> >> >A million people can tell me I look good as I am - but I still


    want to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >lose
    >> >> >that weight for me..........
    >> >>
    >> >
    >>
    >

    Prairie Roots
    232/168/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003


    Prairie Roots
    232/168/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

  20. Briefs? Anything skimpier, perhaps with strings???

    "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I do not do it without a shirt - well, maybe when I get to the top and have to take off my
    drenched shirt. But it is brief!!!!

    Now, clean up those thoughts! (G)

    Brenda Hammond said:

    Isn't it though? Fred in tight biking shorts, no shirt, rotating arms rapidly in circles....get a
    picture for us!

    "Prairie Roots" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Now that's a vision....

    On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:57:03 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >I'm getting my "windmill" in shape - rotate arms rapidly in circles....

    Prairie Roots
    232/170.8/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users ยท 0 guests ยท0 bots ยท0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.