NYNY - Fred - Dec 10th

Okay, I give up, you win. I am very impressed.

Gotta tell you, I don't understand what your sister said. Do you think she meant that when you get
to 155, you will want to weigh less than that? I have wondered that a lot myself. This week, at 157
and thereabouts, I find that I totally don't want to get much more off. I don't feel quite as well
as I do at 160. But I want to stay under 160. I may be done, right here. I will get my NYNY goal
this week unless some really bizarre thing happens.

So you win. Not going there most likely. (unless you gain of course)

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

W O W !!!!

Since I still can't imagine actually reaching goal, I'm even less able to imagine your quandary
about whether you hava a sufficient cushion. I think I like Lesanne's idea though (elsewhere in this
thread) about picking a weight equivalent to a line drawn in the sand.

Prairie Roots

Fred said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Wow Fred! You're doing a wonderful job and that clothing allowance is getting bigger, soon you'll be
able to really bundle up when at meetings. Congratulations!!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Great job on the loss Fred!!!!

--
Janice
263/253.75/150 (maybe 130)

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

good, Lee
Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Great job this week.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:36:20 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Okay, I give up, you win. I am very impressed.

I am not sure what I did this past week and since I do not Journal anymore other than eating the
same basic stuff, there is nothing to check against. I did not get as much exercise but maybe raking
up and wheelbarrowing lots and lots of leaves. Or maybe my portions are actually smaller than I
perceive, other than breakfast where I know I am doing more than one cup of cereal.

Quoted message said:

Gotta tell you, I don't understand what your sister said. Do you think she meant that when you get
to 155, you will want to weigh less than that?

Yes, that is what she meant. That each time I move the line down for "safety" I might want to move
it down just a bit further so that I draw a new safety line and don't approach the OLD one - like
164, oh, well, 160, hmm, 158..... 155, 154?. So maybe shooting for 155 should be just a rough idea
and hovering now would be fine. Up a pound down a pound. I know the rules. I occasionally break the
rules but not really as I quickly try reining it back in. Like purchasing a Costco Fruitcake today
(g) It is sliced and frozen save the one piece I have already eaten. And I probably "chawed" half a
bag of gummy bears last night and these are not tiny bags.

Quoted message said:

have wondered that a lot myself. This week, at 157 and thereabouts, I find that I totally don't
want to get much more off. I don't feel quite as well as I do at 160. But I want to stay under
160. I may be done, right here. I will get my NYNY goal this week unless some really bizarre
thing happens.

You know I just had to look to see what the goal was. I was not sure it was 160 or 155. So I will
call a truce, too. Life fireworks - safe and sane.

Quoted message said:

So you win. Not going there most likely. (unless you gain of course)

I will gain, of course. Xmas parties are coming up. And last night I was asked to make a gourmet,
decadent dessert like my Christmas log (what a pain that one always is!!!) I'm still thinking of the
sweet potato cheesecake but maybe frosting it with a chocolate glaze.

Fred

Quoted message said:

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

I think that I'm at that "line drawn in the sand" place now.

Let me put it this way - I'm not trying for anorexia. And I am eating and appear to have sufficient
energy for my activities. I restocked the dates and mango at Costco along with picking up a fruit
cake (too bad they can't go more natural on their baked offerings) And while there is still a ripple
around the middle, at my age it may be skin.

I know my secretary (who is a WW leader) is very big on people getting to their goal weight and
really trying to MAINTAIN. And I would think that my floating up a bit and down a bit is there.

And I believe with your attitude, you will reach goal and Lifetime.

Prairie Roots said:

W O W !!!!

Since I still can't imagine actually reaching goal, I'm even less able to imagine your quandary
about whether you hava a sufficient cushion. I think I like Lesanne's idea though (elsewhere in
this thread) about picking a weight equivalent to a line drawn in the sand.

Prairie Roots

Fred said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Yes, I am waiting for the power failure - not really - that is one aspect of being thinner - I am
running colder. I probably should rev up the metabolism by doing weights for the upper body.

Brenda Hammond said:

Wow Fred! You're doing a wonderful job and that clothing allowance is getting bigger, soon you'll
be able to really bundle up when at meetings. Congratulations!!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Thanks. I think I'm there

Janice Kennish said:

Great job on the loss Fred!!!!

thanks

Miss Violette said:

good, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Thank you

Laura said:

Great job this week.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had a
weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to have a
sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will not want to
move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and so forth and
...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Gotta tell you, I don't understand what your sister said. Do you think

she

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

meant that when you get to 155, you will want to weigh less than that?

Yes, that is what she meant. That each time I move the line down for "safety" I might want to move
it down just a bit further so that I draw a new safety line and don't approach the OLD one - like
164, oh, well, 160, hmm, 158..... 155, 154?. So maybe shooting for 155 should be just a rough idea
and hovering now would be fine. Up a pound down a pound. I know the rules. I occasionally break
the rules but not really as I quickly try reining it back in. Like purchasing a Costco Fruitcake
today (g) It is sliced and frozen save the one piece I have already eaten. And I probably "chawed"
half a bag of gummy bears last night and these are not tiny bags.

Just this part, clipped the rest. I can see myself not ever being "done" just from the terror of
going the other way. I am going to set my "back to journalin" number at 160, and let it be. I too
have not been journaling this past week and I am at a new low. I think this just takes daily weigh
ins, and a willingness to go back on program when the one sixes show, and hanging around here to
keep the focus. I really have a hard time believing this. I was somewhere yesterday and someone I
did not know well said something that caused me to say something about being fat 🙂 They looked at
me and said, "YOU AREN'T FAT!" I had to laugh I forgot. I'm not.

Thanks for the vote of confidence. This week I'm not sure I agree. So I'll rely on your confidence
until I regain some of my own.

Fred said:

And I believe with your attitude, you will reach goal and Lifetime.

Prairie Roots
232/170.8/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

A year ago I was still in tops with short sleeves, blouses, t-shirts, etc. Now I'm wearing sweaters,
fleece, sweatshirst, etc. I'm cold all the time! I wonder if our bodies will ever adjust, so that we
don't feel the cold so much?
--
Brenda
209/174/150 NYNY goal 160

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Yes, I am waiting for the power failure - not really - that is one aspect of being thinner - I am
running colder. I probably should rev up the metabolism by doing weights for the upper body.

Brenda Hammond said:

Wow Fred! You're doing a wonderful job and that clothing allowance is getting bigger, soon you'll
be able to really bundle up when at meetings. Congratulations!!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Okay here we go:

I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds

(that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing 1.6 pounds from the current
wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier clothing. So I guess the
chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!

Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)

But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue (she, by the way has never had
a weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I mentioned getting to 155 to
have a sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us have discussed then you will
not want to move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so on and
so forth and ...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no idea (g)

(aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the points (gd&r)

Fred
219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

That is well put. I have been UP there now twice. So I know what's possible. But I also know I have
a lot more tools as far as food consumption. Now, attitude, mood, spirit, whatever might have more
power behind it then just the tools. So it will need constant monitoring and vigilance.

I wish us all the best of luck and discipline.

Lesanne said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Gotta tell you, I don't understand what your sister said. Do you think

she

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

meant that when you get to 155, you will want to weigh less than that?

Yes, that is what she meant. That each time I move the line down for "safety" I might want to
move it down just a bit further so that I draw a new safety line and don't approach the OLD one -
like 164, oh, well, 160, hmm, 158..... 155, 154?. So maybe shooting for 155 should be just a
rough idea and hovering now would be fine. Up a pound down a pound. I know the rules. I
occasionally break the rules but not really as I quickly try reining it back in. Like purchasing
a Costco Fruitcake today (g) It is sliced and frozen save the one piece I have already eaten. And
I probably "chawed" half a bag of gummy bears last night and these are not tiny bags.

Just this part, clipped the rest. I can see myself not ever being "done" just from the terror of
going the other way. I am going to set my "back to journalin" number at 160, and let it be. I too
have not been journaling this past week and I am at a new low. I think this just takes daily weigh
ins, and a willingness to go back on program when the one sixes show, and hanging around here to
keep the focus. I really have a hard time believing this. I was somewhere yesterday and someone I
did not know well said something that caused me to say something about being fat 🙂 They looked at
me and said, "YOU AREN'T FAT!" I had to laugh I forgot. I'm not.

Brenda me too, my feet are Always cold.! And it is not a cold climate here,
as I am sure I have mentioned ..
"Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

A year ago I was still in tops with short sleeves, blouses, t-shirts, etc. Now I'm wearing
sweaters, fleece, sweatshirst, etc. I'm cold all the

time!

Quoted message said:

I wonder if our bodies will ever adjust, so that we don't feel the cold so much?
--
Brenda
209/174/150 NYNY goal 160

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Yes, I am waiting for the power failure - not really - that is one aspect of being thinner - I
am running colder. I probably should rev up the metabolism by doing weights for the upper body.

Brenda Hammond said:

Wow Fred! You're doing a wonderful job and that clothing allowance is getting bigger, soon
you'll be able to really bundle up when at

meetings.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Congratulations!!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Okay here we go:
>
> I am down since last week: 1.8 pounds
>
> (that is using my base clothing measurements which means removing

1.6

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> pounds from the current wardrobe) But I'm down in any event 0.2 pounds even with the heavier
> clothing. So I guess the chocolate cake on Sat night was not deadly - YES!
>
> Current weight: 156.6 (heavier clothing 158.2)
>
> But I will mention my sister's take on this minimum weight issue

(she,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> by the way has never had a weight problem other than being UNDER most of her life!!!). I
> mentioned getting to 155 to have a sufficient clothing cushion. She suggested as some of us
> have discussed then

you

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> will not want to move much from there and will try being just a bit lower to keep 155 and so
> on and so forth and ...... Which is what I've been thinking. So what does it mean. I have no
> idea (g)
>
> (aside: don't eat your heart out Lesanne, you cannot afford the

points

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> (gd&r)
>
>
> Fred
> 219.2/156.6/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
>

Me three! Today I wore long underwear (top and bottom), layered under slacks, sweater, and jacket. I
was still cold. For the last couple of months, I get cold easily and have a hard time getting warm.
My feet STAY cold, as do my fingers. A few years ago, I ran a fan in my office. Now I'm running a
foot warmer and wishing I could type with mittens on. I was starting to think I needed to have my
thyroid checked. But maybe being cold is a normal effect of weight loss?

Prairie Roots

Brenda Hammond said:

A year ago I was still in tops with short sleeves, blouses, t-shirts, etc. Now I'm wearing
sweaters, fleece, sweatshirst, etc. I'm cold all the time! I wonder if our bodies will ever adjust,
so that we don't feel the cold so much?

Yesterday we went out to lunch, which we frequently do when babysitting DGD, since then the
cafeteria she loves has to clean up the mess. My Ma loves fried anything. So do I, but you know how
often I eat that sort of thing (same as any of us). We bought the lunch special plate of chicken
fried chicken breast. There is not any skin, but there is a nice crunchy fried whatever all over it.
I also got a vegetable plate, which has 3 veggies. I got mac and cheese (guess who loves that)
canned corn (ditto) and green beans. Then when we got to table, I cut the chicken into 3 pieces, put
about 2 T of mac and cheese, 2 T of corn, all the green beans and a third of the chicken on my
plate. I really figured I would be up a pound this morning, but still nice ole 157. I think this
whole thing is about portion control with the high calorie/fat/sugar items, and liberal servings of
0 point items for satiety and crunch (the chew factor) and this becomes not so hard. Are you also
finding maintenance not as difficult as it was at first? I am! I hope that lasts!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That is well put. I have been UP there now twice. So I know what's possible. But I also know I
have a lot more tools as far as food consumption. Now, attitude, mood, spirit, whatever might have
more power behind it then just the tools. So it will need constant monitoring and vigilance.

I wish us all the best of luck and discipline.

Lesanne said:

Quoted message said:

>Gotta tell you, I don't understand what your sister said. Do you

think

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

she

Quoted message said:

>meant that when you get to 155, you will want to weigh less than that?

Yes, that is what she meant. That each time I move the line down for "safety" I might want to
move it down just a bit further so that I draw a new safety line and don't approach the OLD one
- like 164, oh, well, 160, hmm, 158..... 155, 154?. So maybe shooting for 155 should be just a
rough idea and hovering now would be fine. Up a pound down a pound. I know the rules. I
occasionally break the rules but not really as I quickly try reining it back in. Like
purchasing a Costco Fruitcake today (g) It is sliced and frozen save the one piece I have
already eaten. And I probably "chawed" half a bag of gummy bears last night and these are not
tiny bags.

Just this part, clipped the rest. I can see myself not ever being "done" just from the terror of
going the other way. I am going to set my "back

to

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

journalin" number at 160, and let it be. I too have not been journaling this past week and I am
at a new low. I think this just takes daily

weigh

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

ins, and a willingness to go back on program when the one sixes show, and hanging around here to
keep the focus. I really have a hard time

believing

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

this. I was somewhere yesterday and someone I did not know well said something that caused me to
say something about being fat 🙂 They looked

at

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

me and said, "YOU AREN'T FAT!" I had to laugh I forgot. I'm not.