OK Let's Play Nice

Tom Kunich said:

I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group
so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a little
less demeanor.

1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

jim beam said:

Tom Kunich said:

I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group
so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a little
less demeanor.

1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

Tom Sherman said:

jim beam said:

Tom Kunich said:

I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
little less demeanor.

1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!

and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless lightweight
"contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

jim beam said:

Tom Sherman said:

jim beam said:

Tom Kunich wrote:
> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
> group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
> little less demeanor.
>

1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!

and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless lightweight
"contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be?

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

Tom Sherman said:

jim beam said:

Tom Sherman said:

"jim beam" wrote:
> Tom Kunich wrote:
>> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
>> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
>> group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
>> little less demeanor.
>>
>
> 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with,
> not the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a
> demeanor.
>
> 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
> facts, let alone a dictionary.
>
> [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!

and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless
lightweight "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be?

since when was calling a bullshitter on their [censored] "stalking"???
goddamned factless, useless, meaningless lightweight.

Tom Sherman said:

jim beam said:

Tom Sherman said:

"jim beam" wrote:
> Tom Kunich wrote:
>> I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
>> manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
>> group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
>> little less demeanor.
>>
>
> 1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with,
> not the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a
> demeanor.
>
> 2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
> facts, let alone a dictionary.
>
> [how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!

and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless
lightweight "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be?

I know which one is de more knowledgeable, but which one is de meaner?

Mark J.