One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
But Lance is against the Iraq war, reconcile that wingnut.
"Ken Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
And I have found that Bush supporters are either ignorant (who would vote for someone who has done almost everything wrong?) or evil (those who stand to profit from extremely crony-centric policy). Thankfully (I guess) most Bushites are turning out to be ignorant. Richard (pro-Armstrong and 110% anti-Bush)
"[George] Bush or [John] Kerry? Hum?That question is too hard to answer," Armstrong told La Gazzetta. "Bush is a friend? Kerry? Kerry rides a bike and is a real cycling fan. The other day he phoned me on my mobile to congratulate me and I could tell that he had technical knowledge, too. Bush, on the other hand, sent me a lovely fax on White House paper which says simply: THE PRESIDENT. No, I can?t answer that question."
-- My email address ([email hidden]) is fake. Email sent to it will only get caught in my spam tarpit.
"[George] Bush or [John] Kerry? Hum?That question is too hard to answer," Armstrong told La Gazzetta. "Bush is a friend? Kerry? Kerry rides a bike and is a real cycling fan. The other day he phoned me on my mobile to congratulate me and I could tell that he had technical knowledge, too. Bush, on the other hand, sent me a lovely fax on White House paper which says simply: THE PRESIDENT. No, I can?t answer that question."
Never mind Lance, just remember that ``He who walks in the middle of the road is always first to get knocked down.''
And Baby Bush pedals off on his Training Wheel equipped Trek murmuring: ``Jeezuz Firkin' KeeRist! I start a few wars: They call me a Hero. I rig a few Ballots: They call me a Winner. But I Shag one Lousy Sheep ...... and they call me a SheepShagger''
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
So who is this [censored] posing as me? You gotta love Usenet where people can hijack just about anything, being completely ball-less.
-Ken
Quoted message said:
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
So who is this [censored] posing as me? You gotta love Usenet where people can hijack just about anything, being completely ball-less.
-Ken
Quoted message said:
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
Politics has nothing to do with RBR so get lost.
It was a lame and obvious troll.
FWIW, the truth, as all cyclists know, it exactly the opposite.
Liberal Kerry supporters ride $4000 bikes like Kerry's Serotta, wear tight lycra pants and jerseys to show off their lean bodies, and are attentive about sharing the road.
Right wing nut Bush supporters ride gas guzzling pick-up trucks with gun racks, wear baggy clothes to cover up ugly beer guts, and honk at / throw beer cans at / or run down cyclists on the roads of America every day.
John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
On 27 Jul 2004 00:02:19 -0700, "Ken Papai" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
And I will be voting for Bush.
Congratulations.
JT
Well, I won't be voting for Bush, basically because he sucks (that's another whole story), but I do like seeing Lance trounce the competition (although I would like to have seen Jan win again)even though I am a liberal/socialist/and I have a pair of communist socks.
"Ken Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
There must have been some mixup, the name Ken Papai was at the top of this post where Tom Kunich belongs.
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
There must have been some mixup, the name Ken Papai was at the top of this post where Tom Kunich belongs.
Some juvenile is impersonating me. Political [censored] does not belong in RBR. -Ken
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
There must have been some mixup, the name Ken Papai was at the top of this post where Tom Kunich belongs.
Quoted message said:
Some juvenile is impersonating me. Political [censored] does not belong in RBR. -Ken
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
Careful "Ken Papai", you almost revealed your true identity. Don't worry To....err...you're secret's safe with me.
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
So who is this [censored] posing as me? You gotta love Usenet where people can hijack just about anything, being completely ball-less.
-Ken
Quoted message said:
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
Politics has nothing to do with RBR so get lost.
It was a lame and obvious troll.
FWIW, the truth, as all cyclists know, it exactly the opposite.
Liberal Kerry supporters ride $4000 bikes like Kerry's Serotta, wear tight lycra pants and jerseys to show off their lean bodies, and are attentive about sharing the road.
Right wing nut Bush supporters ride gas guzzling pick-up trucks with gun racks, wear baggy clothes to cover up ugly beer guts, and honk at / throw beer cans at / or run down cyclists on the roads of America every day.
Actually Bush (the W version) is a mountain biker.
NPR reported this morning that he went over the bars on the weekend while riding on his ranch. If I recall there was a similiar report a few months ago (mild bruises from mountain biking etc...)
Does this mean that all the roadies are going to vote for Kerry and all the off road types for Bush?
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
You mean the hard work that Bush showed to get through prep school to Yale to Harvard Business School (daddy I want to go to Yale can you make sure I get in) - that kind of hard work?
"Rick Hopkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Ken Papai did NOT said:
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
You mean the hard work that Bush showed to get through prep school to Yale to Harvard Business School (daddy I want to go to Yale can you make sure I get in) - that kind of hard work?
Please... you're being trolled and showing your ignorance.
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
If I didn't know better, I'd say that this would make "Ken" the strangest one-issue voter ever. Heh...
One thing I've noticed while defending a great champion these past years, is that the bashers tend to be Liberals.
These are the sort of people that refuse to believe a great champion could achieve such success though hard work. They would rather believe that some shortcut or hand out is necessary for anyone to achieve success.
I reject this demeaning, pandering Liberalist outlook. And I will be voting for Bush.
There are bound to be a few who do.
-- -- Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall "We should not march into Baghdad. ... Assigning young soldiers to a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning them to fight in what would be an unwinnable urban guerilla war, it could only plunge that part of the world into ever greater instability." George Bush Sr. in his 1998 book "A World Transformed"