"Dave W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"taywood" <[email hidden]> had this to say news:c25fjp$1pe5jt$1@ID- 131715.news.uni-
berlin.de
Quoted message said:
"Dave W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"taywood" <[email hidden]> had this to say -"]news:[email hidden]-
berlin.de
snip
Quoted message said:> Hello Paul The first time you posted on 15 August 03 our JD gave his inimical response next
> day on behalf of the group.
BBBZZZTTT! Wrong answer. JD does not speak for me. Spam is spam, and if
you
Quoted message said:need someone like JD to point it out for you, well, I think you get my point.
JD gave the spammer a short response. 6 months later he comes back for more, so I gave the
spammer a more measured response, and it didnt end in OFF But if he comes back I'll wake up
Rimmer. He wont spam us after that. TW
Tis True....
Dave
Quoted message said:
Forgive my ignorance, and firstly I apologise to those I have offended, but I thought this
newsgroup, being about mountain biking and named mountain-bike would not necessarily object
to someone making a post informing users of a resource, which they may, or may not find
useful or relevant.
The point is that the post was not "off-topic" or spam, because I'm not trying to sell anything but
to inform people of a potentially useful place to visit. (Yes, the little banners on the site do
provide minimal revenue to cover hosting costs etc).
Maybe I should have worded my post in the form of a question?
No doubt some people do actually find the site useful, but why start making insinuations at an
innocent poster?
Again I apologise, but I'm not too familiar with newsgroup etiquette and am not of the thinking that
it was an offensive or pushy post. This is an open newsgroup which encourages the sharing of
information about a specific subject area. If a resource like this were to be moderated by elitist
power freaks (which I'm not suggesting is the case here), then its users would not be getting the
benefit of that additional knowledge. They would need to be objective.
I don't know why some of you enjoy wasting your time bad mouthing innocent posts because it happens
not to suit you. If the post doesn't interest you then move on. Or is it that you are trying to
notch up your posting count to achieve some sort of status? Whatever!
Paul