OT: The Mu $10,000 Challenge

Steve said:

Could you clarify this challenge a little more?

I am me and Mu is not Chung.

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:47:17 -0400, Mu_nlight Drive wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Steve said:

Could you clarify this challenge a little more?

I am me and Mu is not Chung.

That you are you is irrefutable.

That Mu is not Chung is a proposition not well posed enough to allow either proof or disproof. I
would dearly enjoy relieving you of the $10,000 but it is certainly safe if you cannot pose the
proposition with enough specificity that it can be tested.

Chung has a web site, phone number, etc. We have a pretty good reason to believe Chung is at least
who he says he is. Who are "you"?

"Mu" is simply a variable usenet handle. It cannot be associated with a real person... Hell, even I
can post under that handle as demonstrated by this post. Maybe I'm you?

Steve

Mu_nlight Drive said:

Steve said:

Could you clarify this challenge a little more?

I am me and Mu is not Chung.

It would be an interesting Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde relationship though, wouldn't it? Dr. Chung, the
soft-spoken, passive-aggressive Baptist and Mr.
Mu/Roose, the bitter, mendacious, trainer-wannabe buffoon, crying out for attention. There are well
documented cases of individuals with personality disorders who acted like different people,
independent of each other. The Mu side of Chung could well believe that he really *is* a sperate
individual; even having separate friends. An interesting case study.

Mu_nlight Drive <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Steve said:

Could you clarify this challenge a little more?

I am me and Mu is not Chung.

Oh we know Mu is not Chung and we know Mu is not you. Mu is a fictitious character and a sound
emitted by cows.

Mel

Mu_Too said:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:47:17 -0400, Mu_nlight Drive wrote (in message
<[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Steve said:

Could you clarify this challenge a little more?

I am me and Mu is not Chung.

That you are you is irrefutable.

That Mu is not Chung is a proposition not well posed enough to allow either proof or disproof. I
would dearly enjoy relieving you of the $10,000 but it is certainly safe if you cannot pose the
proposition with enough specificity that it can be tested.

Well, with mu/roose, all you have to do to prove he's Chung is to see the Truth that he is Chung. No
proof is necessary. Just open your heart and you will see that mu/roose and Chung are the same.

Quoted message said:

Steve

I want a piece of that $10,000, pal!

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:34:36 -0400, Fencer wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Mu_Too said:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:47:17 -0400, Mu_nlight Drive wrote (in message
<[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:26:49 -0400, Steve <[email hidden]> wrote:

> Could you clarify this challenge a little more?

I am me and Mu is not Chung.

That you are you is irrefutable.

That Mu is not Chung is a proposition not well posed enough to allow either proof or disproof. I
would dearly enjoy relieving you of the $10,000 but it is certainly safe if you cannot pose the
proposition with enough specificity that it can be tested.

Well, with mu/roose, all you have to do to prove he's Chung is to see the Truth that he is Chung.
No proof is necessary. Just open your heart and you will see that mu/roose and Chung are the same.

Quoted message said:

Steve

I want a piece of that $10,000, pal!

Perhaps we could form a Syndicate and Mu would up the ante ;-) I'll bet Pastorio would be
in for some.

Steve

Steve said:

You know, I might like to get in on that action, Mu. But I'm a little confused as to what it is
exactly. That you're not Chung?

The problem with that is no one knows who "you" are. Chung at least has a web site, phone number,
etc. We have a pretty good reason to believe Chung is at least who he says he is.

Who do you say you are? You appear to be simply a variable usenet handle. I'm confused as to how
anyone could prove or disprove anything about "you".

Could you clarify this challenge a little more?

Steve

Uh-oh, now you've done it. He'll tell you all about the bet.

While reading his description, think of the guy with the three little cups with the ball under one.
He keeps shifting them around and you have to guess which one it's under. Mu_sicalChairs will
present smoke, mirrors, sound and fury. You'll love it. Order the CD, it's good for hours of mirth.

Pastorio

Mu_Too said:

"Mu" is simply a variable usenet handle. It cannot be associated with a real person... Hell, even
I can post under that handle as demonstrated by this post. Maybe I'm you?

I knew you looked familiar...

Pastorio

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:57 -0400, Bob Pastorio wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Mu_Too said:

"Mu" is simply a variable usenet handle. It cannot be associated with a real person... Hell, even
I can post under that handle as demonstrated by this post. Maybe I'm you?

I knew you looked familiar...

Looks like the "challenge" was nothing but a bunch of hot air in the end. Too bad, but not
surprising.

Steve

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:57 -0400, Bob Pastorio wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Mu_Too said:

"Mu" is simply a variable usenet handle. It cannot be associated with a real person... Hell, even
I can post under that handle as demonstrated by this post. Maybe I'm you?

I knew you looked familiar...

Looks like the "challenge" was nothing but a bunch of hot air in the end. Too bad, but not
surprising.

Steve

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:48 -0400, Bob Pastorio <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

While reading his description,..

Until you answer the questions regarding your quad bypass, your smoking, your obesity and why,
with all the information known to you, by your own admission, you nearly killed yourself with a
lousy diet, gluttony, excesses and no exercise, you can keep your hands off your keyboard and in
your pants.

It will be the only thing you will have left to play with, Cheffie. I'm no longer interested in your
pitiful TROLLING and useless demagoguery.

Mu_nlight Drive said:

I'm no longer interested

Oh, sure you are. That's why you keep replying.

People laughing at your challenge again? Three cups and only one ball. Switch 'em around. COnfuse
the spectators. Still, only one ball.

Story of your life.

Pastorio