Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Pant Question

Started by Sniffinvinyl · · Last activity · 42 posts · 2,557 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
22 April 2004
Last activity
25 April 2004
Original author
Sniffinvinyl
Posts
42
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,557
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 42
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:14:25 GMT, "Per Elmsäter"
    <[email hidden]> scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    Hey don't take offense now 😉 We're not talking nylon
    stockings you know. Serioulsy. I've got three pair of Lycra
    shorts that I've treated pretty bad on both asphalt and
    offroad. None have the slightest wear or tear. The only
    telltale signs on them is that they've been through the
    washer hundreds of times maybe.

    I had a friend who had a high-speed rollerskiing incident,
    much skidding was involved. The lycra was fine (didn't even
    tear), but she was a bit scraped and bruised underneath. I'd
    imagine that had it been a different material the outcome
    could have been a bit more painful. Road rash is not fun!

    -Slash
    --
    "Ebert Victorious"
    -The Onion

  2. Penny S said:
    Per Elmsäter said:
    Penny S said:

    Per Elmsäter wrote:
    > Penny S wrote:
    >>> Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out
    >>> style) for going to the baggy variety? (and I don't
    >>> care about all the little pockets, I have a
    >>> camelback).
    >>>
    >> serveral.
    >>
    >> if you snag lycra on a twig and it rips, well... you
    >> have have an exposure situation. Baggies are more
    >> abrasion resistant, plus you have the liner
    >> underneath. The nylon fabric of baggies will also
    >> slide a little more, less likely to snag and tear,
    >> unless you catch a pocket or something.
    >>
    >> Penny
    >
    > I'm not so sure about that. I snagged my Lycra pretty
    > bad on twig last weekend. Results were not noticeable
    > on the shorts but a 4 inch log scar is visible on my
    > hip. Roadie shorts are kindof made to not rip real easy
    > and also to keep you from getting real bad road rash
    > when sliding on asphalt.

    OK, so I don't know what I"m talking about. I can live
    with that.

    Penny

    Hey don't take offense now 😉 We're not talking nylon
    stockings you know. Serioulsy. I've got three pair of
    Lycra shorts that I've treated pretty bad on both asphalt
    and offroad. None have the slightest wear or tear. The
    only telltale signs on them is that they've been through
    the washer hundreds of times maybe.

    not offended. I have three different weights of lycra
    shorts: heavy duty, made of 9 ounce, the same stuff pro
    foot ball leggins are made of, that are extremely tought.
    I have a one lighter pair, that haven't torn yet, and then
    I have a super light wicking lycra suppllex pair that are
    awesome because they are so cool to wear when it's really
    hot.. but they seem to snag on everything.

    as for pantyhose... I wouldn't know what you are talking
    about, haven't owned any for years.

    Penny

    I didn't say pantyhose. That is not in my vocabulary. Over
    here women wear nylon stockings when they dress up. Agreed
    though that Lycra of course comes in different quality. The
    best biking shorts I have are made by Briko.

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  3. mojo deluxe said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts. I
    don't want baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.

    well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some
    Cannondales with a built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave me,
    and I really like them. They aren't too baggy, just
    right. And they don't have elastic at the waist, or open
    pockets, I think thats where you'd get into trouble with
    the snags.


    I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon. I
    have to admit, that elastic at the waist can get annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to
    relieve yourself 😉

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  4. tcmedara said:

    True, lycra isn't the look for everyone. But this is a
    mountain bike group. Fashion is for roadies and "Queer
    Eye" afficionados.


    Being a roadie I have no choice but to agree on the first
    part of your statement. Before I go any further though I
    need to know what a "Queer Eye" afficionado is?

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  5. "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mojo deluxe wrote:
    > I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts. I
    > don't want baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.

    well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some
    Cannondales with a built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave
    me, and I really like them. They aren't too baggy, just
    right. And they don't have elastic at the waist, or
    open pockets, I think thats where you'd get into
    trouble with the snags.


    I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon.
    I have to admit, that elastic at the waist can get
    annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to
    relieve yourself


    😉

    Quoted message said:


    No way!

  6. ----------
    In article <[email hidden]>,

    SniffinVinyl said:


    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out
    style) for going to the baggy variety?

    Fat ass

    Paul - modest

  7. ----------
    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Paul macintyre said:

    ----------
    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    SniffinVinyl said:


    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out
    style) for going to the baggy variety?

    Fat ass

    Paul - modest

    As some one told Bubba once wearing spandex is a privilege
    not a right

  8. "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    SniffinVinyl said:

    I am getting back to my MTB after a few years away from
    the sport. Old shorts have expired elastics, so I need
    new ones.

    Looking thru bike store, they have all these baggy
    shorts with spandex


    inner

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    liners. They said they also have the regular spandex
    pants but they have kind of gone out of style.

    This makes no sense to me, I have ridden before with
    shorts over my


    regular

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    riding pants and it has driven my crazy. To me, spandex
    riding pants


    seem to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make the most sense.

    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out
    style) for going to


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    baggy variety? (and I don't care about all the little
    pockets, I have a camelback).

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small
    camera in a pocket. It makes it much more available for
    candid shots rather than having to get setup for a shot. I
    can even grab it and snap shots while riding.

    For storing things like that, I just stick them down he side
    of my lycras, next to the hip - stays where the hell I left
    it without trouble.

    Shaun aRe

  9. Per Elmsäter said:
    tcmedara said:

    True, lycra isn't the look for everyone. But this is a
    mountain bike group. Fashion is for roadies and "Queer
    Eye" afficionados.


    Being a roadie I have no choice but to agree on the first
    part of your statement. Before I go any further though I
    need to know what a "Queer Eye" afficionado is?

    bravotv.comQueer Eye for the Straight Guy

  10. G.T. said:


    I just stick it in the pocket. My original Olympus Stylus
    from 1991 survived tons of stuff so I'm treating my A70
    the same way. I may be too trusting but the A70 feels
    pretty solid.

    Quoted message said:

    I was checking out these stretchy neoprene cases the
    other day, ww3.onecall.comPID 23511.htm

    I'd be a little worried about the camera in pocket
    getting whacked against something.

    I've ridden with my A70 a handful of times now and dropped
    it once. I've already lost the bexel around the lens, it
    appears to just be cosmetic, and the door to the compact
    flash is kind of discombobulated. The only thing I'm
    worried about is the lcd getting too scratched up over
    time. Even the pathetic little viewfinder on my Olympus is
    20 times better than the viewfinder on the A70 so the lcd
    is pretty important.

    Personally I don't want to get a case because I like to be
    able to shoot quickly so I can take pictures of someone
    who may be close behind without asking them to stop,
    seconds count in that scenario. And a lot of my solo
    photos are taken while riding, I don't have to stop and
    get the camera out of the case.

    Greg

    hmmmm. I've got an A70 also, and it seems like one tough
    little camera. I dropped mine on the cement floor of the
    garage the other day, and my first thought was, oh... [censored].
    My Nikon Coolpix did not survive a similar drop onto
    something soft ( roof insulation). I didn't even notice
    that the case had a dent in it until I took the camera in
    to get the lens cleaned. The guy freaked and suggested I
    check my prints carefully for any focus mis-alignment.
    So... alls well!!

    I'm still thinking of one of those little neoprene cased
    like I linked to, for my camel back strap. Mostly I'm in
    pocketless lycra shorts.

    penny

  11. "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    SniffinVinyl said:

    I am getting back to my MTB after a few years away
    from the sport. Old shorts have expired elastics, so I
    need new ones.

    Looking thru bike store, they have all these baggy
    shorts with spandex


    inner

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    liners. They said they also have the regular spandex
    pants but they


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    kind of gone out of style.

    This makes no sense to me, I have ridden before with
    shorts over my


    regular

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    riding pants and it has driven my crazy. To me,
    spandex riding pants


    seem to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make the most sense.

    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out
    style) for going


    to

    Quoted message said:

    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    baggy variety? (and I don't care about all the little
    pockets, I have


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    camelback).

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small
    camera in a pocket. It makes it much more available for
    candid shots rather than having to


    get

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    setup for a shot. I can even grab it and snap shots
    while riding.

    For storing things like that, I just stick them down he
    side of my lycras, next to the hip - stays where the hell
    I left it without trouble.

    I do for Clif bars and stuff but the camera is too heavy.

    Greg

  12. Penny S said:

    I didn't even notice that the case had a dent in it until
    I took the camera in to get the lens cleaned.

    Whassamatta, a t-shirt and thumb swirl ain't good
    enough for ya?!?

    Bill "blur" S.

  13. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    G.T. said:

    SniffinVinyl wrote:

    [sniffin baggy shorts]

    Quoted message said:

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small camera
    in a pocket.

    Isn't that what jersey pockets are for? Or are cycling
    jerseys taboo as well?

    Eric

  14. Eric Murray said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    G.T. said:

    SniffinVinyl wrote:

    [sniffin baggy shorts]

    Quoted message said:

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small
    camera in a pocket.

    Isn't that what jersey pockets are for? Or are cycling
    jerseys taboo as well?

    Eric

    Camel backs generally close off the top of the pocket, or
    rest on top of them.mamkeing putting stuff in there
    impractical. I know I use a pack in lieu of pockets, I
    generally use pocketless tops.

    penny

  15. mojo deluxe said:

    "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...
    > mojo deluxe wrote:
    >> I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts. I
    >> don't want baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.
    >
    >
    > well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some
    > Cannondales with a built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave
    > me, and I really like them. They aren't too baggy, just
    > right. And they don't have elastic at the waist, or
    > open pockets, I think thats where you'd get into
    > trouble with the snags.
    >
    I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon.
    I have to admit, that elastic at the waist can get
    annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to
    relieve yourself 😉


    No way!

    No, not like the dogs do it. I meant one leg of the bibs 😉
    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  16. Penny S said:
    Per Elmsäter said:
    tcmedara said:

    True, lycra isn't the look for everyone. But this is a
    mountain bike group. Fashion is for roadies and "Queer
    Eye" afficionados.


    Being a roadie I have no choice but to agree on the first
    part of your statement. Before I go any further though I
    need to know what a "Queer Eye" afficionado is?

    bravotv.comQueer Eye for the Straight Guy

    Absolutely awesome

    Quote "They are the Fab Five: an elite team of gay men
    dedicated to extolling the simple virtues of style, taste
    and class. Each week their mission is to transform a style-
    deficient and culture-deprived straight man from drab to fab
    in each of their respective categories: fashion, food &
    wine, interior design, grooming and culture. " End quote

    Being a roadie I'm safe, which means I'm neither style-
    deficient nor culture-deprived. The rest of you however
    better watch out for the Fab Five ROTFL

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  17. Eric Murray said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    G.T. said:

    SniffinVinyl wrote:

    [sniffin baggy shorts]

    Quoted message said:

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small
    camera in a pocket.

    Isn't that what jersey pockets are for? Or are cycling
    jerseys taboo as well?

    Jersey pockets aren't as easy to reach as pants pockets,
    they don't have a flap, and they're particularly hard to
    reach with a Camelback on.

    Greg

  18. "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mojo deluxe wrote:
    > "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    > message "]news:[email hidden]...
    >> mojo deluxe wrote:
    >>> I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts.
    >>> I don't want baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.
    >>
    >>
    >> well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some
    >> Cannondales with a built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave
    >> me, and I really like them. They aren't too baggy,
    >> just right. And they don't have elastic at the waist,
    >> or open pockets, I think thats where you'd get into
    >> trouble with the snags.
    >>
    > I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real
    > soon. I have to admit, that elastic at the waist can
    > get annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg
    to relieve yourself 😉


    No way!

    No, not like the dogs do it. I meant one leg of the bibs
    😉

    Does it work for the ladies as well?

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  19. ZeeExSixAre said:

    "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real
    >> soon. I have to admit, that elastic at the waist can
    >> get annoying.
    >
    > Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg
    > to relieve yourself 😉
    >
    No way!

    No, not like the dogs do it. I meant one leg of the
    bibs 😉

    Does it work for the ladies as well?

    most gals dont have to wear bib shorts to keep their pants
    up over their gut. I did have a dancer friend show me a
    very interesting trick involving tights worn under
    leotards once...

    penny

  20. Penny S said:

    OK, so I don't know what I"m talking about. I can live
    with that.

    I take everything back. I ripped my Lycra bibs real bad
    today when I fell on a splintered stump sticking out of the
    ground. It was like
    - Knock, knock.
    - Who's there?
    - Madame.
    - Madame who?
    - My damn shoe's caught in the pedal. Topple, topple and
    slowly over. OUCH

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.