Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

pedals for me!

Started by Jim Plantz · · Last activity · 43 posts · 1,789 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
1 March 2004
Last activity
4 March 2004
Original author
Jim Plantz
Posts
43
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,789
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 43
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. After using clip and clipless pedals I tried a tripple track BMX peadl and have been happy
    ever since.

    I ride for fun and exercise only.

  2. "Jim Plantz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    After using clip and clipless pedals I tried a tripple track BMX peadl and have been happy
    ever since.

    I ride for fun and exercise only.

    Thanks for that.

  3. On 2004-03-01, Jim Plantz penned:

    Quoted message said:

    After using clip and clipless pedals I tried a tripple track BMX peadl and have been happy
    ever since.

    I ride for fun and exercise only.

    What other reasons are there?

    --
    monique

  4. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 2004-03-01, Jim Plantz penned:

    Quoted message said:

    After using clip and clipless pedals I tried a tripple track BMX peadl and have been happy ever
    since.

    I ride for fun and exercise only.

    What other reasons are there?

    Transportation.

    I ride for fun and exericise too.

    I've got an expensive Sportworks rack to TRANSPORT my bike🙂

  5. On 2004-03-01, jack penned:

    Quoted message said:


    "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 2004-03-01, Jim Plantz penned:

    Quoted message said:

    After using clip and clipless pedals I tried a tripple track BMX peadl and have been happy ever
    since.

    I ride for fun and exercise only.

    What other reasons are there?

    Transportation.

    Oh, yeah. *blush*

    Quoted message said:


    I ride for fun and exericise too.

    I've got an expensive Sportworks rack to TRANSPORT my bike🙂

    I'm working on getting a nice WRX to transport my bike =) It's hard to mount a bike to a
    convertible.

    --
    monique

  6. Monique Y. Herman said:


    I'm working on getting a nice WRX to transport my bike =) It's hard to mount a bike to a
    convertible.

    I wish the WRX engine would have been available in the Legacy Outback in 2000 (or anytime). I would
    have made (well requested) my wife get that engine. The six banger didn't come out until
    2001.......gggrrrrrr.

    But she loves the car.

    Gary

  7. On 2004-03-01, GeeDubb penned:

    Quoted message said:
    Monique Y. Herman said:


    I'm working on getting a nice WRX to transport my bike =) It's hard to mount a bike to a
    convertible.

    I wish the WRX engine would have been available in the Legacy Outback in 2000 (or anytime). I
    would have made (well requested) my wife get that engine. The six banger didn't come out until
    2001.......gggrrrrrr.

    But she loves the car.

    I test drove the WRX on Saturday, just to make sure that it really is the car of my dreams. It is.
    The damn thing is so much more powerful than my Celica, though -- the car kept lurching as I threw
    it into 1st and 2nd because I wasn't used to it.

    It will definitely take some practice before I'm comfortable in inclement weather in it.

    But I won't be getting one for another 6mos or a year at least, so this is all just some bizarre
    form of masochism. I've already figured out the Yakima configuration I want -- extra-wide bars so
    that I can mount the big powderhound (ski rack) in the center with a bike mount on either side. Just
    need to figure out *how* extra-wide the bars need to be.

    --
    monique

  8. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]... <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    It will definitely take some practice before I'm comfortable in inclement weather in it.


    Think, 'all wheel drive'.

  9. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I test drove the WRX on Saturday, just to make sure that it really is the car of my dreams. It is.

    The Forester XT is faster, and holds more bikes.

    Also the handling is pretty good for a tall wagon. In addition to rally racing, hill climbs and of
    course drag racing, these things regularly compete in autocross.

  10. David said:

    "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I test drove the WRX on Saturday, just to make sure that it really is the car of my dreams. It is.

    The Forester XT is faster, and holds more bikes.

    Also the handling is pretty good for a tall wagon. In addition to rally racing, hill climbs and of
    course drag racing, these things regularly compete in autocross.


    Yeah, but its still a Forester. We call them PLCs-Pregnant Lady Cars.

    Shawn Legacy Wagon

  11. "Shawn Curry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1lN0c.92716$Xp.419286@attbi_s54...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Yeah, but its still a Forester. We call them PLCs-Pregnant Lady Cars.

    So that's where the belly came from. I thought I just needed to spend more time on the bike.

  12. On 2004-03-01, David penned:

    Quoted message said:


    "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I test drove the WRX on Saturday, just to make sure that it really is the car of my
    dreams. It is.

    The Forester XT is faster, and holds more bikes.

    Also the handling is pretty good for a tall wagon. In addition to rally racing, hill climbs and of
    course drag racing, these things regularly compete in autocross.

    The trick is my particular combination of requirements:

    manual awd sporty small enough to be maneuverable in tiny boulder parking lots

    My two cars thus far have been a probe and a celica convertible, so in comparison, the WRX has a
    massive carrying capacity. It will definitely be plenty -- I have room for multiple hockey bags, or
    ski gear, or my mountain bike inside. Right now, I practically have to jump on the trunk lid to get
    my hockey bag to fit in the car. Skis will sort of fit (the convertable mechanism gets in the way of
    fully using the trunk space), and the bike is right out.

    Cars, at least to me, are as much about emotion as they are about utility. And for me, the WRX makes
    my heart go thumpa-thumpa-thump. The Forester just doesn't do it for me.

    --
    monique

  13. On 2004-03-01, mojo deluxe penned:

    Quoted message said:


    "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]... <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    It will definitely take some practice before I'm comfortable in inclement weather in it.


    Think, 'all wheel drive'.

    Think, 'getting used to a newer, more touchy clutch.'

    It's not the car's abilities I'm worried about; it's mine, at least for the first few days. The
    sticks I've driven include my celica, a rav-4, and a bmw 5-series; after learning on the celica, the
    latter two were a cinch for me. Maybe I psyched myself out, but first and second gear on the WRX
    were definitely a lot more sensitive than on any of those other cars. It will take some practice
    before I'm comfortable enough with that clutch to drive it in snow.

    --
    monique

  14. Monique Y. Herman said:

    It's not the car's abilities I'm worried about; it's mine, at least for the first few days. The
    sticks I've driven include my celica, a rav-4, and a bmw 5-series; after learning on the celica,
    the latter two were a cinch for me. Maybe I psyched myself out, but first and second gear on the
    WRX were definitely a lot more sensitive than on any of those other cars. It will take some
    practice before I'm comfortable enough with that clutch to drive it in snow.

    It's likely just different gear ratios that help give the WRX it's acceleration.

  15. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 2004-03-01, David penned: The trick is my particular combination of requirements:

    manual awd sporty small enough to be maneuverable in tiny boulder parking lots

    Like the WRX, the Forester is based on the Impreza, and I think the width & length are pretty close.
    I think the XT meets all of the above, except "sporty" is in the eyes of the beholder. The WRX is
    sportier, if a little slower.

    I was really tempted to buy a WRX wagon myself.

    They both look good to me. WRX Wagon: thatguycanhelladraw.comrallyx.jpg

    Forester: czechferrari.czandros22.jpg

    The Sti on the other hand is right out. The ground clearance is nice, but I don't think it has very
    good traction: subaru.co.ukgallery3.htm

  16. On 2004-03-01, bomba penned:

    Quoted message said:
    Monique Y. Herman said:

    It's not the car's abilities I'm worried about; it's mine, at least for the first few days. The
    sticks I've driven include my celica, a rav-4, and a bmw 5-series; after learning on the celica,
    the latter two were a cinch for me. Maybe I psyched myself out, but first and second gear on the
    WRX were definitely a lot more sensitive than on any of those other cars. It will take some
    practice before I'm comfortable enough with that clutch to drive it in snow.

    It's likely just different gear ratios that help give the WRX it's acceleration.

    *nod* understood ... it's not a problem, but it will take getting used to, and while I'm getting
    used to it, I'd rather not be driving on snow.

    --
    monique

  17. On 2004-03-01, David penned:

    Quoted message said:

    Like the WRX, the Forester is based on the Impreza, and I think the width & length are pretty
    close. I think the XT meets all of the above, except "sporty" is in the eyes of the beholder. The
    WRX is sportier, if a little slower.

    I definitely like the look of the WRX wagon better than that of the forester, and I have always
    loved the convenience of hatchbacks.

    Quoted message said:

    I was really tempted to buy a WRX wagon myself.

    They both look good to me. WRX Wagon:
    thatguycanhelladraw.comrallyx.jpg

    Forester: czechferrari.czandros22.jpg

    (Mine probably won't have promotional stickers and dayglo paint all over
    it.)

    Quoted message said:


    The Sti on the other hand is right out. The ground clearance is nice, but I don't think it has
    very good traction: subaru.co.ukgallery3.htm

    Not to mention price ...

    --
    monique

  18. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 2004-03-01, mojo deluxe penned:

    Quoted message said:


    "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]... <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    It will definitely take some practice before I'm comfortable in inclement weather in it.


    Think, 'all wheel drive'.

    Think, 'getting used to a newer, more touchy clutch.'


    That should smooth out.

    Quoted message said:

    It's not the car's abilities I'm worried about; it's mine, at least for the first few days. The
    sticks I've driven include my celica, a rav-4, and a bmw 5-series; after learning on the celica,
    the latter two were a cinch for me. Maybe I psyched myself out, but first and second gear on the
    WRX were definitely a lot more sensitive than on any of those other cars. It will take some
    practice before I'm comfortable enough with that clutch to drive it in snow.


    Is this the turbo model you're looking at? If it is, it's fast, fast, fast. It's at the top of my
    car 'want' list.

  19. On 2004-03-02, mojo deluxe penned:

    Quoted message said:


    Is this the turbo model you're looking at? If it is, it's fast, fast, fast. It's at the top of my
    car 'want' list.

    The WRX *is* the turbo version of the Impreza. There's also the WRX STi, which is even more beefy.

    --
    monique

  20. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 2004-03-02, mojo deluxe penned:

    Quoted message said:


    Is this the turbo model you're looking at? If it is, it's fast, fast, fast. It's at the top of
    my car 'want' list.

    The WRX *is* the turbo version of the Impreza. There's also the WRX STi, which is even more beefy.


    Ahhh. It's the STi, which is at the top of my list. I've even created a desktop with one.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.