Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Pinarello Geometry Question

Started by Derk Drukker · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,841 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 March 2003
Last activity
12 March 2003
Original author
Derk Drukker
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,841
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi Guys!

    I was offered a Surprise frameset by my bikeshop. I measured it and the Centre-Centre seattube
    length was 59Cm. The top tube was 57 cm. (C-C)

    According to the Pina folders, there has never been a 59cm, so that is a bit amazing.

    What my problem really is, is the top tube length: it is a 57 CM length, which I find very short. My
    other bikes have a 57.5 CM top tube. On this bike I have a 13cm stem.

    I am a bit afraid,given the length of my upper body, that I can't place the saddle back enough
    behind the bracket. I need to place the front of the saddle 8.47cm behind the imaginary line that
    goes through the bracket.

    Could anyone tell me if these 57 CM top tube is too small for me? I don't want to place a saddle
    completely at the end of it's rail, since this often introduces creaks.

    Isn't a 57CM top tube length short, given a 58cm framesize?

    Thanks! Derk

  2. Here is some geometry info on Pinarellos cbike.comsurprise.htm

    "Derk Drukker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi Guys!

    I was offered a Surprise frameset by my bikeshop. I measured it and the Centre-Centre seattube
    length was 59Cm. The top tube was 57 cm. (C-C)

    According to the Pina folders, there has never been a 59cm, so that is a bit amazing.

    What my problem really is, is the top tube length: it is a 57 CM length, which I find very short.
    My other bikes have a 57.5 CM top tube. On this bike I have a 13cm stem.

    I am a bit afraid,given the length of my upper body, that I can't place the saddle back enough
    behind the bracket. I need to place the front of the saddle 8.47cm behind the imaginary line that
    goes through the bracket.

    Could anyone tell me if these 57 CM top tube is too small for me? I don't want to place a saddle
    completely at the end of it's rail, since this often introduces creaks.

    Isn't a 57CM top tube length short, given a 58cm framesize?

    Thanks! Derk

  3. d drucker-<< Could anyone tell me if these 57 CM top tube is too small for me?

    How long is your femurs?

    What I mean to say, you can't tell if 57cm is too long or short unless you get you knee in the
    correct place via fore-aft and seat height, an indirect measurement of your femur, affected by seat
    tube ANGLE...THEN you can determine if the top tube is too long or short.

    << Isn't a 57CM top tube length short, given a 58cm framesize?

    a '58cm' frameset measures almost nothing..what is important is seattube ANGLE and top tube LENGTH,
    not seat tube length.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  4. Hi Peter,

    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    How long is your femurs?


    From what point should it be measured exactly?

    Quoted message said:

    What I mean to say, you can't tell if 57cm is too long or short unless you get you knee in the
    correct place via fore-aft and seat height, an indirect measurement of your femur, affected by
    seat tube ANGLE...THEN you can determine if the top tube is too long or short.


    I owned 2 Pina's before: a 58 and a 59 cm Asolo. If I remember well, the top tube length was a bit
    short for me.

    A frame should enable me to put the saddle tip 8.4cm's behind the imaginary vertical line that goes
    through the bottom bracket. The distance from that line through the bracket to the steer should be
    49.5cm. Or: the distance saddle-steer = 58CM, saddle should be 8.4 cm behind the bracket.

    Merckx made me a custom frame and he made me a 58.5 CM seat tube, 58 CM top tube, 12 CM stem.

    Another question: how important is it too have exchangeable derailleur pat's (is this the right
    word?) in a aluminium frame? The Surprise doesn't have this.

    Do you know if the Surprise is a good frame?

    I have another bike (titanium). I want this bike to take with m on vacations in hilly area's. Would
    it be a good choice according to you?

    Greets, Derk

  5. Hi Peter,

    Thanks for helping me. After a very long weekend thinking about frames, I decided to buy another
    Merckx frameset. Since they already made a custom frame for me and measured me, I asked them to make
    me another steel frame (MX Leader).

    I like my old SLX frame that I have used for over 12 years. Therefore I think I can't go wrong with
    another steel frame.

    About Pina geometry: the 58 Asolo was high enough, but too short IMHO. The 59 was too high, but long
    enough. After Merckx measured me in Belgium the outcome was indeed a 58.5 C-C seattube and a 58 CM
    C-C horizontal tube.

    Thanks for your help!

    Greets, Derk

  6. "Derk Drukker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi Peter,

    Thanks for helping me. After a very long weekend thinking about frames, I decided to buy another
    Merckx frameset. Since they already made a custom frame for me and measured me, I asked them to
    make me another steel frame (MX Leader).

    I like my old SLX frame that I have used for over 12 years. Therefore I think I can't go wrong
    with another steel frame.

    About Pina geometry: the 58 Asolo was high enough, but too short IMHO. The 59 was too high, but
    long enough. After Merckx measured me in Belgium the outcome was indeed a 58.5 C-C seattube and a
    58 CM C-C horizontal tube.

    Thanks for your help!


    I rode a Merckx SLX frame for quite a few years. The best frame I ever had. A pity I swapped it for
    a TREK 5500. My next frame will probably be a Merckx Team SC. Hjalmar

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.