UK and Europe · Public discussion

Probably not a spoiler - US Postal Team Car

Started by Danny Colyer · · Last activity · 10 posts · 467 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
22 July 2004
Last activity
24 July 2004
Original author
Danny Colyer
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
467
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm not sure what I pressed on my hard drive recorder remote control
    this evening. I was recording the Tour and watching it at the same
    time. I paused the coverage as it was being broadcast (that's what I
    really love about my hard drive recorder) and rewound it a bit, then I
    pressed something that stopped it recording, cleared the buffer on the
    broadcast coverage *and* returned me to the bit that was currently being
    broadcast.

    In all I can't have missed more than a couple of minutes, but the very
    last bit that I recorded was one of the commentators saying that the US
    Postal team car had been relegated to the back of the procession. The
    recording cut out before he said why, so now DW and I are itching to
    know the reason.

    Why has the US Postal team car been relegated to the back?

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  2. Danny Colyer said:

    Why has the US Postal team car been relegated to the back?

    It nearly collided with a motorbike yesterday

    Ian

  3. wheelsgoround said:
    Danny Colyer said:

    Why has the US Postal team car been relegated to the back?

    It nearly collided with a motorbike yesterday

    Ian

    Wasn't it cos it got between the bike and the rider? Something about a
    rule requiring the car not get between the two. Didn't hear it
    completely, but I'm watching today's taped, and I know they mentioned it
    (complete with footage of motorbike's gesticulations and pointing at the
    team car number).

    --

    Velvet

  4. wheelsgoround said:

    It nearly collided with a motorbike yesterday

    Thanks.

    It must have been quite a challenge driving up the Alpe d'Huez without
    knocking over any spectators, let alone keeping an eye out for the
    motorbikes as well. Not that that's any excuse.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  5. Danny Colyer said:

    I'm not sure what I pressed on my hard drive recorder remote control
    this evening. I was recording the Tour and watching it at the same
    time. I paused the coverage as it was being broadcast (that's what I
    really love about my hard drive recorder) and rewound it a bit, then I
    pressed something that stopped it recording, cleared the buffer on the
    broadcast coverage *and* returned me to the bit that was currently being
    broadcast.

    In all I can't have missed more than a couple of minutes, but the very
    last bit that I recorded was one of the commentators saying that the US
    Postal team car had been relegated to the back of the procession. The
    recording cut out before he said why, so now DW and I are itching to
    know the reason.

    Why has the US Postal team car been relegated to the back?

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine


    I think for nearly hitting a spectator...

  6. Danny Colyer said:

    It must have been quite a challenge driving up the Alpe d'Huez without
    knocking over any spectators,

    Yes. It must have been very tempting! Morons galore up there yesterday.

  7. Danny Colyer said:


    I'm not sure what I pressed on my hard drive recorder remote control
    this evening.

    Quoted message said:

    In all I can't have missed more than a couple of minutes, but the very
    last bit that I recorded was one of the commentators saying that the US
    Postal team car had been relegated to the back of the procession. The
    recording cut out before he said why, so now DW and I are itching to
    know the reason.

    Why has the US Postal team car been relegated to the back?

    The full story is at:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/jul04/jul22news4

    Which starts:
    As a result of an "dangerous driving" in yesterday's l'Alpe d'Huez time
    trial, US Postal director Johan Bruyneel's car was relegated to the back
    of the caravan for today's stage 17. The race jury ruled that Bruyneel
    hindered a TV cameraman that was filming Armstrong near the start of the
    climb. But Bruyneel argued that he had a prior agreement to be there,
    and finally persuaded the jury to reinstate him at the front of the
    caravan before the start today.

    John B

  8. JohnB:

    Quoted message said:

    As a result of an "dangerous driving" in yesterday's l'Alpe d'Huez time
    trial, US Postal director Johan Bruyneel's car was relegated to the back
    of the caravan for today's stage 17.

    And what [censored] difference did it make?

    d.

  9. JohnB said:
    Danny Colyer said:


    I'm not sure what I pressed on my hard drive recorder remote control
    this evening.

    Quoted message said:

    In all I can't have missed more than a couple of minutes, but the
    very last bit that I recorded was one of the commentators saying
    that the US Postal team car had been relegated to the back of the
    procession. The recording cut out before he said why, so now DW and
    I are itching to know the reason.

    Why has the US Postal team car been relegated to the back?

    The full story is at:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/jul04/jul22news4

    Which starts:
    As a result of an "dangerous driving" in yesterday's l'Alpe d'Huez
    time trial, US Postal director Johan Bruyneel's car was relegated to
    the back of the caravan for today's stage 17. The race jury ruled
    that Bruyneel hindered a TV cameraman that was filming Armstrong near
    the start of the climb. But Bruyneel argued that he had a prior
    agreement to be there, and finally persuaded the jury to reinstate
    him at the front of the caravan before the start today.

    John B

    That's nothing! The Gerolsteiner decided to start the wrong way /down/ the
    mountain before the riders had finished coming /up/!

  10. JohnB said:

    The full story is at:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/jul04/jul22news4

    Which starts:
    As a result of an "dangerous driving" in yesterday's l'Alpe d'Huez time
    trial, US Postal director Johan Bruyneel's car was relegated to the back
    of the caravan for today's stage 17. The race jury ruled that Bruyneel
    hindered a TV cameraman that was filming Armstrong near the start of the
    climb. But Bruyneel argued that he had a prior agreement to be there,
    and finally persuaded the jury to reinstate him at the front of the
    caravan before the start today.

    Bit OT

    Hi John

    Re: "There was an agreement before the race with Jean-Marie Leblanc
    and John Lelangue that for security reasons, I would go directly
    behind Lance until the barriers," Bruyneel explained to Cyclingnews
    today.

    The commentators occasionally mention that one cannot get a true idea
    of the steepness of a slope on TV. I've often thought that a camera
    looking downhill, back from in front the rider, gives a far better
    impression of the severity of the more gnarly climbs.

    James

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.