General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Questions regarding Viking Range

Started by Vic · · Last activity · 46 posts · 1,160 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
24 November 2005
Last activity
30 November 2005
Original author
Vic
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,160
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–46 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. wff_ng_7 said:

    "Gregory Morrow"

    Quoted message said:

    But you can easily defeat spam by setting up email filters and munging


    yer

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    address...even Arnold the Pig knows that...so you are even outwitted by


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    crafty porker...SHEESH!

    So how many spam messages have you gotten this month? It's now Nov. 28 and
    I've gotten a total of 2 on all the email accounts I hold. Neither was
    related to newsgroup accounts. I got 5 in October, all related to a


    newgroup

    Quoted message said:

    account with a munged address. In September I got 2 spam messages, and in
    August, just 1 across all my accounts.

    Filtering only works so well, as does munging addresses. I am quite
    satisfied with my methods for spam prevention. Changing the newsgroup
    account occassionally is much more effective.

    I've used the same email nic for a long time now on Usenet and I get ZERO
    spams in my mailbox, any junk goes into the junk email folder for deletion.
    Earthlink has EXCELLENT filtering...

    Your "reasoning" in this matter sounds kinda "suspicious"...

    Quoted message said:

    As to protecting identities and preventing things from becoming a


    permanent

    Quoted message said:

    record, I have not written anything that I would be ashamed of it it


    became

    Quoted message said:

    public. But I see no need in giving anyone ammunition. I did go back and
    check and there are things I've written in newsgroups from early 1995, if
    not earlier, plus many other writings in other parts of the web. Those are
    under my full name. I see no need for doing that now other than in my
    professional or business dealings.

    Hmmm...are you "Brad"...???

    Quoted message said:

    Sheldon on the other hand has quite a record behind him. Virtually
    everything he has posted in the last decade to newsgroups has been


    recorded

    Quoted message said:

    for posterity, as has everything that has been written about him in
    response. And it's not just in usenet newsgroups, and certainly not just


    in

    Quoted message said:

    rfc. He appears in many places elsewhere too. Just in rfc, when I said he


    is

    Quoted message said:

    widely considered to be the most senior and reviled twit, there is an
    immense record of rfc postings covering many years to document that fact.

    Just to select one of Sheldon's postings from outside rfc, let's see if he
    wants to explain this one, dated June 25, 2004, 11:04 AM:

    ----
    All Moslems...

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------


    ------

    Quoted message said:


    ... are cockroaches.

    Do not feel badly eradicating moslems. Moslems are a
    DISEASE! ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
    ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
    *********
    "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without
    tribulation." Sheldon
    ----

    I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to find where he posted this.


    But

    Quoted message said:

    surely any longer term rfc reader will recognize the similarities to what


    he

    Quoted message said:

    posted here.

    So what is yer point?

    --
    Best
    Greg

  2. "Gregory Morrow"

    Quoted message said:

    I've used the same email nic for a long time now on Usenet and I get ZERO
    spams in my mailbox, any junk goes into the junk email folder for
    deletion.
    Earthlink has EXCELLENT filtering...

    Your "reasoning" in this matter sounds kinda "suspicious"...

    I don't have to go to my junk email folder for deletion, as I never receive
    the stuff in the first place. Over the years, the vast bulk of the spam I
    get has been as a result of newsgroup postings. Filtering (after my ISP's
    filtering) was not particularly effective, as there was very little in
    common in the emails, though I could normally identify them immediately by
    sender and subject without opening them. All were sent by zombie PCs that
    had been recruited to send spam, and the target web sites they wanted me to
    visit were predominately in China. Usually there was a pool of computers at
    the target web site (the name resolved to many IP addresses).

    At the peak of my problem, I got up to 6 spam emails a day. I am sure a lot
    of people would be extremely happy to only get 6 spam emails a day. Now I
    only get a couple a month. It is not worth further filtering to remove
    these. If you are getting better results (meaning not even having to deal
    with a junk email folder), more power to you. I'm satisfied with my results.

    Quoted message said:

    Hmmm...are you "Brad"...???

    No.

    Quoted message said:

    So what is yer point?

    My point is a lot of people (Sheldon included) are leaving a vast trail
    behind them that may come to haunt them in the future. At one level there
    are things such as identity theft. At other levels some people "advertise"
    that they will be going away for an extended vacation... almost as if
    saying: "Please burglarize my house while I'm away." Then there's the
    "permanent record" thing... I wonder if in the future whether things people
    put out on the net in their younger day will be brought up when they are
    applying for an important position. It won't just be a nude photograph years
    before in Playboy like it was in the old days. Well, no Supreme Court
    appointment for Sheldon, he's said so much that would disqualify him... not
    that he (or anyone else here) wants that position! ;-)

  3. On Tue 29 Nov 2005 08:27:10a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it wff_ng_7?

    Quoted message said:

    My point is a lot of people (Sheldon included) are leaving a vast trail
    behind them that may come to haunt them in the future.

    Who the hell would want to steal Sheldon's identity? :-)) Whoever does
    deserves it!

    --
    Wayne Boatwright *¿*
    _____________________________________________

    A chicken in every pot is a *LOT* of chicken!

  4. "Wayne Boatwright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue 29 Nov 2005 08:27:10a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it wff_ng_7?

    Quoted message said:

    My point is a lot of people (Sheldon included) are leaving a vast trail
    behind them that may come to haunt them in the future.

    Who the hell would want to steal Sheldon's identity? :-)) Whoever does
    deserves it!

    Well, if anyone does, I sincerely hope they bury it somewhere
    deep where it can't possibly claw out and escape again...

    Bob M.

  5. Wow, some things really do speak for themselves. That truly was classic
    Sheldon!

    So, Sheldon, who "won"? ;-)

    I guess my work here is done.

    (I know I was a bad boy... I wasn't supposed to feed the twit!)

  6. wff_ng_7 said:

    Wow, some things really do speak for themselves. That truly was classic
    Sheldon!

    So, Sheldon, who "won"? ;-)

    I guess my work here is done.

    (I know I was a bad boy... I wasn't supposed to feed the twit!)

    Actually, it would have helped if you had correctly quoted what comment
    of Sheldon's you were replying to.

    --
    Best
    Greg

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.