"Steve Wertz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Blair P. Houghton said:
Just saw tonight's two installments on Food Network.
In the recent one, she's puffy, shiny, overlit, bombastic, sloppy, and annoying.
In the 2003 one, she was thin, subdued, precise, sensible, and downright sexy.
I was saw her magazine, and her nose looks like it's taking that alcoholic/drug-addict sheen to it. Pock marks are next.
Seriously, it looks like somebody put a fake nose her on her current issue.
-sw
I had the foodnetwork most of the day yesterday and I glanced at her program and her face was all puffy looking, but most of all her face was red -- not just the cheeks; I had to wonder if she had been in the sun, but at second glance, I don't think it was a sunburn. Such a cute and sweet girl to start acting so squirrely at so young an age. Do I detect a cry for help? Naw! Dee Dee
On 2006-03-30, Blair P. Houghton <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Just saw tonight's two installments on Food Network.
In the recent one, she's puffy, shiny, overlit, bombastic, sloppy, and annoying.
In the 2003 one, she was thin, subdued, precise, sensible, and downright sexy.
Quoted message said:
Yeah, she's oinked right off the radar and her staff is asleep at the wheel. Someone needs to shoot off a flare.
That's sarcasm, right? Just checking. Besides, I saw today's eps, and she didn't look bloated on the newer one at all. She was showing too much cleavage for my taste, but otherwise, she didn't seem much different. In the recent one she looked just fine. I'd wager she's a good 50 pounds lighter than any of us on rfc but I'm sure since she's a minor celeb, she should be held to a higher standard than you or I.
just fine. I'd wager she's a good 50 pounds lighter than any of us on rfc but I'm sure since she's a minor celeb, she should be held to a higher standard than you or I.
I think you'd lose. I don't know how tall she is, but 50 pounds less than me is 115 pounds. I don't think so. She wouldn't have any cleavage at all at that weight!
PS: I'm 6'2"
-- Dan Abel [email hidden] Petaluma, California, USA
just fine. I'd wager she's a good 50 pounds lighter than any of us on rfc but I'm sure since she's a minor celeb, she should be held to a higher standard than you or I.
Quoted message said:
I think you'd lose. I don't know how tall she is, but 50 pounds less than me is 115 pounds. I don't think so. She wouldn't have any cleavage at all at that weight!
Uh, no. Many moons ago I was 115 lbs, at 5'0", and I had plenty of cleavage. A few months ago I read a journal of someone who met Ray at a book signing and they said she was probably 5'2", so I'm sure she can have cleavage. And I can attest to the fact that if you're short, a few extra pounds can look like a lot more than it really is.
I was saw her magazine, and her nose looks like it's taking that alcoholic/drug-addict sheen to it. Pock marks are next.
Seriously, it looks like somebody put a fake nose her on her current issue.
-sw
There was an article about her in one of the Portland underground newspapers - she was supposed to meet some people for dinner and ended up filming some scene for her new show. They pretty muich said she was late, rude and the girl apparently *really* likes her wine. When she gets liquored up, she gets "talkative" and baudy (aka loud and obnoxious). She also apprently smokes. -L.
I was saw her magazine, and her nose looks like it's taking that alcoholic/drug-addict sheen to it. Pock marks are next.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
-sw
There was an article about her in one of the Portland underground newspapers - she was supposed to meet some people for dinner and ended up filming some scene for her new show. They pretty muich said she was late, rude and the girl apparently *really* likes her wine. When she gets liquored up, she gets "talkative" and baudy (aka loud and obnoxious). She also apprently smokes. -L.
"Talkative" when she gets liquored up . . .you gotta be kidding! She's 24/7 when sober.
Couple of years ago I used to try her TV recipes and they weren't bad. But I bought one of her books, Thirty Minutes Meals 2, I believe, and haven't tried one. They look inviting, but something's not right, there's a weenie ingredient in each one. Reminds me of Emeril's recipes where he's making a meat loaf with familiar ingredients until he calls for Burmese sawgrass.
"Dan Abel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
(Glitter Ninja) said:
just fine. I'd wager she's a good 50 pounds lighter than any of us on rfc but I'm sure since she's a minor celeb, she should be held to a higher standard than you or I.
I think you'd lose. I don't know how tall she is, but 50 pounds less than me is 115 pounds. I don't think so. She wouldn't have any cleavage at all at that weight!
PS: I'm 6'2"
Quoted message said:
Dan Abel
[email hidden] Petaluma, California, USA
Hey, Dan, you cut a good figure.
You'd lose in my case, too. Not obese, but way rounded, about 13# over what I'd really like to weigh. Dee Dee
n the recent one, she's puffy, shiny, overlit, bombastic, sloppy, and
annoying. <<
Wasn't there a marriage in there somewhere? Maybe she is pregnant or taking fertility drugs.... Anyway, I haven't like the recipes I have seen and have never seen her, but by the standards expressed here, Julia Child would have had to stay home.
Fame has really gone to her head and nobody's governing her, least of all herself.
I still can't decide if it's sad: she's obviously overworked, what with those nineteen series on the Food Network. And then an alleged talk show coming up on real TV.
I guess in terms of *interest* (it seems rude to me to slam somebody's looks) everybody peaks. Emeril sure did. It shouldn't come as a surprise that Rachael has also.
"Dan Abel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
(Glitter Ninja) said:
just fine. I'd wager she's a good 50 pounds lighter than any of us on rfc but I'm sure since she's a minor celeb, she should be held to a higher standard than you or I.
I think you'd lose. I don't know how tall she is, but 50 pounds less than me is 115 pounds. I don't think so. She wouldn't have any cleavage at all at that weight!
PS: I'm 6'2"
Quoted message said:
Dan Abel
[email hidden] Petaluma, California, USA
Hey, Dan, you cut a good figure.
You'd lose in my case, too. Not obese, but way rounded, about 13# over what I'd really like to weigh. Dee Dee
My youngest son says he's in shape.....round is a shape....lol....Sharon
<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Fame has really gone to her head and nobody's governing her, least of all herself.
I still can't decide if it's sad: she's obviously overworked, what with those nineteen series on the Food Network. And then an alleged talk show coming up on real TV.
I guess in terms of *interest* (it seems rude to me to slam somebody's looks) everybody peaks. Emeril sure did. It shouldn't come as a surprise that Rachael has also.
I think she shows mileage vs. age-peaking. She should take better care of herself; evidently she knows how to do that. She's got the world, why abuse it -- which is what it looks like to me, too much high living. I know of which I speak -- tee hee. Dee Dee
Just saw tonight's two installments on Food Network.
In the recent one, she's puffy, shiny, overlit, bombastic, sloppy, and annoying.
In the 2003 one, she was thin, subdued, precise, sensible, and downright sexy.
Fame has really gone to her head and nobody's governing her, least of all herself.
My boys are in love with Rachel Ray and they prefer her more recent, ultra-hyper incarnation. They are fifteen months old, so make of that what you will.
My boys are in love with Rachel Ray and they prefer her more recent, ultra-hyper incarnation. They are fifteen months old, so make of that what you will.
I saw her on the most recent Next Food Network Star show, she really seemed normal and not so ... well, hyper. Nice change.
[email hidden] hitched up their panties and posted news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
-L. said:
Steve Wertz said:
I was saw her magazine, and her nose looks like it's taking that alcoholic/drug-addict sheen to it. Pock marks are next.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
-sw
There was an article about her in one of the Portland underground newspapers - she was supposed to meet some people for dinner and ended up filming some scene for her new show. They pretty muich said she was late, rude and the girl apparently *really* likes her wine. When she gets liquored up, she gets "talkative" and baudy (aka loud and obnoxious). She also apprently smokes. -L.
"Talkative" when she gets liquored up . . .you gotta be kidding! She's 24/7 when sober.
Couple of years ago I used to try her TV recipes and they weren't bad. But I bought one of her books, Thirty Minutes Meals 2, I believe, and haven't tried one. They look inviting, but something's not right, there's a weenie ingredient in each one. Reminds me of Emeril's recipes where he's making a meat loaf with familiar ingredients until he calls for Burmese sawgrass.
Nan Dupree was the best. She would have a glass of wine an just take off. I loved her 😉
Michael
-- "The most remarkable thing about my mother is that for thirty years she served the family nothing but leftovers. The original meal has never been found."
Nan Dupree was the best. She would have a glass of wine an just take off. I loved her 😉
Nathalee? I liked her. Was wondering about her just the other day. Something Sue said reminded me of her, she always measured her ingredients onto wax paper or something then she'd just toss it. Bugged me. Otherwise I like her, would like to see her again.