Re: Chelation Clinics

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Chelation Clinics
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/22/2004 2:58 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Re: Chelation Clinics
>From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 20, 2004"

[email hidden]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>Date: 1/21/2004 2:45 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>
>"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> >Subject: Re: Chelation Clinics
>> >From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 20, 2004"

[email hidden]

Quoted message said:

>>
>> >.hardly proof...
>>
>> First there are no studies, then no proof.
>
>I have yet to see a current study using modern technology which shows

an

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>opening of the coronary arteries.

Yes, Mark Thorson.

Keep repeating.

I'll keep posting the studies.

Not for the closed minded *gang*, but for others who may foolishly

believe

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

your lies.

I claim that there is no current study using modern technology which

shows

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

that CHEATlation

There is no such thing as cheatlation.

I choose to call it that, as that is how I understand it.

Quoted message said:

You are repeating yourelf, because you prefer to remain in denial.

No, I prefer for you to post a current study, using modern technology, which
shows that CHEATlation actually affects the arterial lumina.

Quoted message said:

There are studies and they have been posted.

Please cite *one* study that fits my request. If you do not have one, just
say so.

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

From: [email hidden] (Hawki63)

Quoted message said:

ignorant lunatic

That's hawki's purpose for being here.

She is a waste of time, sort of like Michele.

Jan obviously doesn't think I'm a waste of time -- otherwise she
wouldn't mention me in a thread I'm not commenting on. It's beginning
to look like she is losing what little control she may have had over
herself -- a case of emotional incontinence.

Michele
I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

<< I choose to call it that, as that is how I understand it. >>

Well, Probert....what part of the "cow died", and we don't need your bull
around here did you not understand?

Who cares...Probert, what you call things that you have no personal knowledge
about?

I nominate Probert for "P.A.L." of the year......after all, anyone that cross
dresses, hides behind fake names, has got to be one, pathetic, alltime
LOSER........but not to worry, some of your other pals in here, do the same
thing you are doing...and they are in the running too.....

"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).