: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
"Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
vernon wrote:
: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and never make it to 50.
vernon wrote: : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : news:[email hidden]... :: vernon wrote: :: ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol. :: :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson :: JE and :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19. : : NOT a study, just hype.
PeterB wrote: : Juhana Harju wrote: :: vernon wrote: :: ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol. :: :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson :: JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart :: disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19. :: :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5 :: :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5/F2 : : But he's right that it doesn't matter.
He did not say that. It was a question wheather dietary fats have an effect on serum cholesterol. And they do.
: Serum cholesterol means : nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to : attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to : the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high : cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal : cholesterol and never make it to 50.
There are multiple mechanisms and risk factors involved in atheroschlerosis. Cholesterol is not the only one, but still it is one risk factor, among many others.
But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and never make it to 50.
How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?
"Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
vernon wrote: : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : news:[email hidden]... :: vernon wrote: :: ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol. :: :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson :: JE and :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19. : : NOT a study, just hype.
Incredible ignorance.
-- Juhana
They didn't take (use) people who had ALL other dietary input identical.
Phony study.
People who have high fat intake are (typically) subject to higher cholesterol. Of these, they (typically) have more heart disease. What is CONVENIENTLY left out is the other bad dietary habits. People who consume high amounts of fat almost always have an unusually high intake of sugar and low fiber.
BTW Cholesterol is a symptom, not a cause. As a matter of FACT high good cholesterol is counter to heart problems, hence the MASSIVE drive by pharms to come out with something to "raise" the good. Of course you knew that.
"PeterB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Juhana Harju said:
vernon wrote:
: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and never make it to 50.
PeterB
Lesions or irritations (one step below lesion) Homosysteins can "irritate". The body produces cholesterol as a defense, not a blocker. I'm not a 100% about how C works but it is a defensive catalyst and is not counter to positive. I never cease to be amazed at new findings. I know also that they have proved that C softens the walls of veins and arteries (a good thing)
Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of the first one here.
"Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
PeterB wrote: : Juhana Harju wrote: :: vernon wrote: :: ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol. :: :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson :: JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart :: disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19. :: :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5 :: :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5/F2 : : But he's right that it doesn't matter.
He did not say that. It was a question wheather dietary fats have an effect on serum cholesterol. And they do.
: Serum cholesterol means : nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to : attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to : the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high : cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal : cholesterol and never make it to 50.
There are multiple mechanisms and risk factors involved in atheroschlerosis. Cholesterol is not the only one, but still it is one risk factor, among many others.
-- Juhana
You need to learn to read studies for the complete message.
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:12 -0700 in article <[email hidden]> "vernon"
Quoted message said:
Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of the first one here.
Cholesterol cannot pass blood-brain barrier, brain makes its own cholesterol, see for example
Bjorkhem I, Meaney S. Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 May;24(5):806-15. Epub 2004 Feb 5. Review. PMID: 14764421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://atvb.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/5/806>
"Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
vernon wrote: : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : news:[email hidden]... :: vernon wrote: :: ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol. :: :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson :: JE and :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19. : : NOT a study, just hype.
"Ron Peterson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
PeterB wrote: :
Quoted message said:
But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and never make it to 50.
How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?
24 Mar 2006 09:42:46 -0800 in article <[email hidden]> "Ron Peterson"
Quoted message said:
PeterB wrote: :
Quoted message said:
But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and never make it to 50.
How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?
Wrong question. Why do you think that just taking vitamin C would keep lesions from forming?
"Matti Narkia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:12 -0700 in article <[email hidden]> "vernon"
Quoted message said:
Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of the first one here.
Cholesterol cannot pass blood-brain barrier, brain makes its own cholesterol, see for example
Bjorkhem I, Meaney S. Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 May;24(5):806-15. Epub 2004 Feb 5. Review. PMID: 14764421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://atvb.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/5/806>
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:22:51 -0700 in article <[email hidden]> "vernon"
Quoted message said:
"Matti Narkia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:12 -0700 in article <[email hidden]> "vernon"
Quoted message said:
Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of the first one here.
Cholesterol cannot pass blood-brain barrier, brain makes its own cholesterol, see for example
Bjorkhem I, Meaney S. Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 May;24(5):806-15. Epub 2004 Feb 5. Review. PMID: 14764421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://atvb.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/5/806>
You have no idea what you posted.
You have absolutely no idea what you write about ;-).
vernon wrote: : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : news:[email hidden]... :: vernon wrote: :: ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol. :: :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson :: JE and :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19. : : NOT a study, just hype.
vernon wrote: : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : news:[email hidden]... :: vernon wrote: :: ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol. :: :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson :: JE and :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19. : : NOT a study, just hype.
But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and never make it to 50.
How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?
Nutrition studies show that 5 servings of fruit and vegetables per day reduce heart disease risk substantially. That translates into roughly 500mg vitamin C daily depending on your reference foods. It's possible that humans have genetically adapted to hypoascorbemia (loss of the enzyme L-gulonolactone oxidase) and that we no longer require vitamin C in amounts equivalent to animal synthesis relative to body weight. On the other hand, it's likely our ancestors consumed much greater volumes of vitamin C-ridch foods, even after the loss of the ability to synthesize ascorbic acid. Based on the animal model, we should supplement 5g to 12g per day, at least for optimal health. But since the main role of ascorbic acid is probably collagen building (ie., other processes [however important] might be secondary in favor of collagen manufacture and arterial health), I think 500mg-1g vitamin C daily should be enough. Vitamin C is just one nutrient, of course, so a supplement routine should include all the major and micro nutrients, as well as omega 3 TFAs.
But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and never make it to 50.
How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?
Nutrition studies show that 5 servings of fruit and vegetables per day reduce heart disease risk substantially. That translates into roughly 500mg vitamin C daily depending on your reference foods. It's possible that humans have genetically adapted to hypoascorbemia (loss of the enzyme L-gulonolactone oxidase) and that we no longer require vitamin C in amounts equivalent to animal synthesis relative to body weight. On the other hand, it's likely our ancestors consumed much greater volumes of vitamin C-ridch foods, even after the loss of the ability to synthesize ascorbic acid. Based on the animal model, we should supplement 5g to 12g per day, at least for optimal health. But since the main role of ascorbic acid is probably collagen building (ie., other processes [however important] might be secondary in favor of collagen manufacture and arterial health), I think 500mg-1g vitamin C daily should be enough. Vitamin C is just one nutrient, of course, so a supplement routine should include all the major and micro nutrients, as well as omega 3 TFAs.