General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Is oily fish really healthy?

Started by Juhana Harju · · Last activity · 19 posts · 512 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
24 March 2006
Last activity
28 March 2006
Original author
Juhana Harju
Posts
19
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
512
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–19 of 19
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. vernon wrote:

    : No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.

    That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE and
    Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a
    critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.

    http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5

    http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5/F2

    --
    Juhana

  2. "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    vernon wrote:

    : No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.

    That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE
    and
    Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a
    critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.

    NOT a study, just hype.

  3. Juhana Harju said:

    vernon wrote:

    : No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.

    That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE and
    Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a
    critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.

    http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5

    http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5/F2

    --
    Juhana

    But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing
    if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to.
    That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for
    higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol
    without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and
    never make it to 50.

    PeterB

  4. vernon wrote:
    : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : news:[email hidden]...
    :: vernon wrote:
    ::
    ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
    ::
    :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson
    :: JE and
    :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease:
    :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
    :
    : NOT a study, just hype.

    Incredible ignorance.

    --
    Juhana

  5. PeterB wrote:
    : Juhana Harju wrote:
    :: vernon wrote:
    ::
    ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
    ::
    :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson
    :: JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart
    :: disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
    ::
    :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5
    ::
    :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5/F2
    :
    : But he's right that it doesn't matter.

    He did not say that. It was a question wheather dietary fats have an effect
    on serum cholesterol. And they do.

    : Serum cholesterol means
    : nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to
    : attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to
    : the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high
    : cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal
    : cholesterol and never make it to 50.

    There are multiple mechanisms and risk factors involved in atheroschlerosis.
    Cholesterol is not the only one, but still it is one risk factor, among many
    others.

    --
    Juhana

  6. PeterB wrote:
    :

    Quoted message said:

    But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing
    if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to.
    That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for
    higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol
    without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and
    never make it to 50.

    How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?

    --
    Ron

  7. "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    vernon wrote:
    : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : news:[email hidden]...
    :: vernon wrote:
    ::
    ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
    ::
    :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson
    :: JE and
    :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease:
    :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
    :
    : NOT a study, just hype.

    Incredible ignorance.

    --
    Juhana


    They didn't take (use) people who had ALL other dietary input identical.

    Phony study.

    People who have high fat intake are (typically) subject to higher
    cholesterol. Of these, they (typically) have more heart disease. What is
    CONVENIENTLY left out is the other bad dietary habits. People who consume
    high amounts of fat almost always have an unusually high intake of sugar
    and low fiber.

    BTW
    Cholesterol is a symptom, not a cause. As a matter of FACT high good
    cholesterol is counter to heart problems, hence the MASSIVE drive by pharms
    to come out with something to "raise" the good. Of course you knew that.

  8. "PeterB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Juhana Harju said:

    vernon wrote:

    : No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    : cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    : cholesterol can raise cholesterol.

    That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson JE
    and
    Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a
    critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.

    http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5

    http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5/F2

    --
    Juhana

    But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing
    if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to.
    That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for
    higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol
    without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and
    never make it to 50.

    PeterB

    Lesions or irritations (one step below lesion)
    Homosysteins can "irritate". The body produces cholesterol as a defense,
    not a blocker.
    I'm not a 100% about how C works but it is a defensive catalyst and is not
    counter to positive. I never cease to be amazed at new findings. I know
    also that they have proved that C softens the walls of veins and arteries (a
    good thing)

    Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for
    proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of
    the first one here.

  9. "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    PeterB wrote:
    : Juhana Harju wrote:
    :: vernon wrote:
    ::
    ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
    ::
    :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson
    :: JE and Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart
    :: disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
    ::
    :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5
    ::
    :: http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/5/F2
    :
    : But he's right that it doesn't matter.

    He did not say that. It was a question wheather dietary fats have an
    effect
    on serum cholesterol. And they do.

    : Serum cholesterol means
    : nothing if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to
    : attach to. That's a function of collagen production, which points to
    : the need for higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high
    : cholesterol without heart disease. Lots of people have normal
    : cholesterol and never make it to 50.

    There are multiple mechanisms and risk factors involved in
    atheroschlerosis.
    Cholesterol is not the only one, but still it is one risk factor, among
    many
    others.

    --
    Juhana

    You need to learn to read studies for the complete message.

  10. Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:12 -0700 in article
    <[email hidden]> "vernon"

    Quoted message said:


    Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for
    proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of
    the first one here.


    Cholesterol cannot pass blood-brain barrier, brain makes its own
    cholesterol, see for example

    Bjorkhem I, Meaney S.
    Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier.
    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 May;24(5):806-15. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
    Review.
    PMID: 14764421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://atvb.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/5/806>

    --
    Matti Narkia

  11. "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    vernon wrote:
    : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : news:[email hidden]...
    :: vernon wrote:
    ::
    ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
    ::
    :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson
    :: JE and
    :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease:
    :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
    :
    : NOT a study, just hype.

    Incredible ignorance.

    --
    Juhana

    Plus ARROGANCE.

  12. "Ron Peterson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    PeterB wrote:
    :

    Quoted message said:

    But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing
    if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to.
    That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for
    higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol
    without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and
    never make it to 50.

    How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?

    --
    Ron

    Dunno, Ron, how much?

  13. 24 Mar 2006 09:42:46 -0800 in article
    <[email hidden]> "Ron Peterson"

    Quoted message said:


    PeterB wrote:
    :

    Quoted message said:

    But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing
    if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to.
    That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for
    higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol
    without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and
    never make it to 50.

    How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?

    Wrong question. Why do you think that just taking vitamin C would keep
    lesions from forming?

    --
    Matti Narkia

  14. "Matti Narkia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:12 -0700 in article
    <[email hidden]> "vernon"

    Quoted message said:


    Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for
    proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of
    the first one here.


    Cholesterol cannot pass blood-brain barrier, brain makes its own
    cholesterol, see for example

    Bjorkhem I, Meaney S.
    Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier.
    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 May;24(5):806-15. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
    Review.
    PMID: 14764421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://atvb.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/5/806>

    --
    Matti Narkia

    You have no idea what you posted.

  15. Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:22:51 -0700 in article
    <[email hidden]> "vernon"

    Quoted message said:


    "Matti Narkia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:12 -0700 in article
    <[email hidden]> "vernon"

    Quoted message said:


    Oh, yes, we mustn't forget that cholesterol is absolutely necessary for
    proper brain function and helps prevent aneurism. I have seen evidence of
    the first one here.


    Cholesterol cannot pass blood-brain barrier, brain makes its own
    cholesterol, see for example

    Bjorkhem I, Meaney S.
    Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier.
    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 May;24(5):806-15. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
    Review.
    PMID: 14764421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://atvb.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/5/806>

    You have no idea what you posted.


    You have absolutely no idea what you write about ;-).

    --
    Matti Narkia

  16. Juhana Harju said:

    vernon wrote:
    : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : news:[email hidden]...
    :: vernon wrote:
    ::
    ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
    ::
    :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson
    :: JE and
    :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease:
    :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
    :
    : NOT a study, just hype.

    Incredible ignorance.

    Oh, I see you've met Vernon.
    --
    Peter Bowditch aa #2243
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
    Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  17. "Peter lying Bowditch" blathered

    Quoted message said:
    Juhana Harju said:

    vernon wrote:
    : "Juhana Harju" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : news:[email hidden]...
    :: vernon wrote:
    ::
    ::: No study has EVER shown that fats (other than hydrogenated) changes
    ::: cholesterol in a body. No study has ever shown that eating
    ::: cholesterol can raise cholesterol.
    ::
    :: That is simply not true. Look at the Harvard review by Hu FB, Manson
    :: JE and
    :: Willett WC. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease:
    :: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
    :
    : NOT a study, just hype.

    Incredible ignorance.

    Oh, I see you've met Vernon.

    Lay off the sauce.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Peter Bowditch

  18. Ron Peterson said:

    PeterB wrote:
    :

    Quoted message said:

    But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing
    if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to.
    That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for
    higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol
    without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and
    never make it to 50.

    How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?

    Nutrition studies show that 5 servings of fruit and vegetables per day
    reduce heart disease risk substantially. That translates into roughly
    500mg vitamin C daily depending on your reference foods. It's possible
    that humans have genetically adapted to hypoascorbemia (loss of the
    enzyme L-gulonolactone oxidase) and that we no longer require vitamin C
    in amounts equivalent to animal synthesis relative to body weight. On
    the other hand, it's likely our ancestors consumed much greater volumes
    of vitamin C-ridch foods, even after the loss of the ability to
    synthesize ascorbic acid. Based on the animal model, we should
    supplement 5g to 12g per day, at least for optimal health. But since
    the main role of ascorbic acid is probably collagen building (ie.,
    other processes [however important] might be secondary in favor of
    collagen manufacture and arterial health), I think 500mg-1g vitamin C
    daily should be enough. Vitamin C is just one nutrient, of course, so
    a supplement routine should include all the major and micro nutrients,
    as well as omega 3 TFAs.

    PeterB

  19. Ron Peterson said:

    PeterB wrote:
    :

    Quoted message said:

    But he's right that it doesn't matter. Serum cholesterol means nothing
    if there are no lesions in the coronary arteries for it to attach to.
    That's a function of collagen production, which points to the need for
    higher intake of vitamin C. Lots of people have high cholesterol
    without heart disease. Lots of people have normal cholesterol and
    never make it to 50.

    How much vitamin C is needed in the diet to keep lesions from forming?

    Nutrition studies show that 5 servings of fruit and vegetables per day
    reduce heart disease risk substantially. That translates into roughly
    500mg vitamin C daily depending on your reference foods. It's possible
    that humans have genetically adapted to hypoascorbemia (loss of the
    enzyme L-gulonolactone oxidase) and that we no longer require vitamin C
    in amounts equivalent to animal synthesis relative to body weight. On
    the other hand, it's likely our ancestors consumed much greater volumes
    of vitamin C-ridch foods, even after the loss of the ability to
    synthesize ascorbic acid. Based on the animal model, we should
    supplement 5g to 12g per day, at least for optimal health. But since
    the main role of ascorbic acid is probably collagen building (ie.,
    other processes [however important] might be secondary in favor of
    collagen manufacture and arterial health), I think 500mg-1g vitamin C
    daily should be enough. Vitamin C is just one nutrient, of course, so
    a supplement routine should include all the major and micro nutrients,
    as well as omega 3 TFAs.

    PeterB

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.