Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Let's review, shall we?

Started by Bill Sornson · · Last activity · 9 posts · 789 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 October 2006
Last activity
2 October 2006
Original author
Bill Sornson
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
789
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. We should all be ashamed. {pause}

    FOR LETTING AN ANONYMOUS TROLL NETJACK THE GROUP.

    BS (really)

  2. http://www.schneier.com/essay-045.html
    --
    JT
    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  3. Quoted message said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    We should all be ashamed. {pause}

    FOR LETTING AN ANONYMOUS TROLL NETJACK THE GROUP.

    BS (really)

    You should be ashamed of yourself in particular for debating and
    losing before resorting to calling me a troll.

    Yes, I bit about 4 hours after you posted (and many others had already
    replied) -- quoting articles refuting your false statements. I've been
    trying to ignore anonymous trolls, but once the discussion got started I
    weakened.

    Who are you? Where do you live? Why are you afraid to post under your real
    name?

    DO YOU EVEN RIDE A BIKE?!? Why not post about THAT once in a while?

  4. Bill Sornson said:
    Quoted message said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    We should all be ashamed. {pause}

    FOR LETTING AN ANONYMOUS TROLL NETJACK THE GROUP.

    BS (really)

    You should be ashamed of yourself in particular for debating and
    losing before resorting to calling me a troll.

    Yes, I bit about 4 hours after you posted (and many others had already
    replied) -- quoting articles refuting your false statements.

    What's to refute? In March of 2003 I pretty much predicted the future
    course of the war. Are you saying that I didn't really write it? You
    haven't refuted jack.

    Quoted message said:

    I've been
    trying to ignore anonymous trolls,

    By definition, I am not a troll.

    Quoted message said:

    but once the discussion got started I
    weakened.

    So it took until your 19th post to get around to calling me a troll?
    HA! Yeah, I would say you "weakened" all right. Then you did what all
    the True Believers have to do when confronted with reality: change the
    subject, as you are doing here.

    Quoted message said:

    Who are you? Where do you live?

    Why do you need to know? Wanna publish it on FreeRepublic and see how
    much hate mail you can direct at me and my family?

    Quoted message said:

    Why are you afraid to post under your real
    name?

    Why do you need to know my real name?

    Quoted message said:

    DO YOU EVEN RIDE A BIKE?!? Why not post about THAT once in a while?

    Check the archives.

  5. Bill Sornson said:
    Quoted message said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    We should all be ashamed. {pause}

    FOR LETTING AN ANONYMOUS TROLL NETJACK THE GROUP.

    BS (really)

    You should be ashamed of yourself in particular for debating and
    losing before resorting to calling me a troll.

    Yes, I bit about 4 hours after you posted (and many others had already
    replied) -- quoting articles refuting your false statements.

    What's to refute? In March of 2003 I pretty much predicted the future
    course of the war. Are you saying that I didn't really write it? You
    haven't refuted jack.

    Quoted message said:

    I've been
    trying to ignore anonymous trolls,

    By definition, I am not a troll.

    Quoted message said:

    but once the discussion got started I
    weakened.

    So it took until your 19th post to get around to calling me a troll?
    HA! Yeah, I would say you "weakened" all right. Then you did what all
    the True Believers have to do when confronted with reality: change the
    subject, as you are doing here.

    Quoted message said:

    Who are you? Where do you live?

    Why do you need to know? Wanna publish it on FreeRepublic and see how
    much hate mail you can direct at me and my family?

    Quoted message said:

    Why are you afraid to post under your real
    name?

    Why do you need to know my real name?

    Quoted message said:

    DO YOU EVEN RIDE A BIKE?!? Why not post about THAT once in a while?

    Check the archives.

  6. Quoted message said:
    Bill Sornson said:
    Quoted message said:

    Bill Sornson wrote:
    > We should all be ashamed. {pause}
    >
    > FOR LETTING AN ANONYMOUS TROLL NETJACK THE GROUP.
    >
    > BS (really)

    You should be ashamed of yourself in particular for debating and
    losing before resorting to calling me a troll.

    Yes, I bit about 4 hours after you posted (and many others had already
    replied) -- quoting articles refuting your false statements.

    What's to refute? In March of 2003 I pretty much predicted the future
    course of the war. Are you saying that I didn't really write it? You
    haven't refuted jack.

    Quoted message said:

    I've been
    trying to ignore anonymous trolls,

    By definition, I am not a troll.

    Quoted message said:

    but once the discussion got started I
    weakened.

    So it took until your 19th post to get around to calling me a troll?
    HA! Yeah, I would say you "weakened" all right. Then you did what all
    the True Believers have to do when confronted with reality: change the
    subject, as you are doing here.

    Quoted message said:

    Who are you? Where do you live?

    Why do you need to know?

    He does not need to know. The "who are you?" BS is some of the worst BS
    on Usenet.

    Quoted message said:

    Wanna publish it on FreeRepublic and see how
    much hate mail you can direct at me and my family?

    Quoted message said:

    Why are you afraid to post under your real
    name?

    Why do you need to know my real name?

    It's just BU**SH**.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    DO YOU EVEN RIDE A BIKE?!? Why not post about THAT once in a while?

    Check the archives.

  7. [email hidden] wrote (TWICE...AGAIN):

    (You're double posting for some reason. FYI.)

    Quoted message said:

    By definition, I am not a troll.

    You sure were in THIS thread. You posted a purely political (off-topic)
    rant to garner attention and traffic. TROLL.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    but once the discussion got started I
    weakened.

    So it took until your 19th post to get around to calling me a troll?
    HA! Yeah, I would say you "weakened" all right. Then you did what all
    the True Believers have to do when confronted with reality: change the
    subject, as you are doing here.

    I included myself in the admonition to not feed a troll like you. LOOK at
    all the posts it (your troll) generated. We should all try to do better (by
    ignoring trolls -- anonymous ones especially) like you.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Who are you? Where do you live?

    Why do you need to know? Wanna publish it on FreeRepublic and see how
    much hate mail you can direct at me and my family?

    I don't even know what that is. My only experience with that was gettting
    SWAMPED with Spam one time right after I flamed Shallow (or was it Snoot?).
    Happened more than once.

    I just think it's cowardly to post inflamatory TROLLS under an anonymous
    username. Many others (even liberals like JB and FK) seem to agree.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Why are you afraid to post under your real
    name?

    Why do you need to know my real name?

    I don't. I just take people more seriously who aren't afraid to stand up
    and say what they think/believe.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    DO YOU EVEN RIDE A BIKE?!? Why not post about THAT once in a while?

    Check the archives.

    Why bother. I'm interested in REAL people.

  8. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Bill Sornson wrote:
    >> We should all be ashamed. {pause}
    >>
    >> FOR LETTING AN ANONYMOUS TROLL NETJACK THE GROUP.
    >>
    >> BS (really)
    >
    > You should be ashamed of yourself in particular for debating and
    > losing before resorting to calling me a troll.

    Yes, I bit about 4 hours after you posted (and many others had already
    replied) -- quoting articles refuting your false statements.

    What's to refute? In March of 2003 I pretty much predicted the future
    course of the war. Are you saying that I didn't really write it? You
    haven't refuted jack.

    Quoted message said:

    I've been
    trying to ignore anonymous trolls,

    By definition, I am not a troll.

    Quoted message said:

    but once the discussion got started I
    weakened.

    So it took until your 19th post to get around to calling me a troll?
    HA! Yeah, I would say you "weakened" all right. Then you did what all
    the True Believers have to do when confronted with reality: change the
    subject, as you are doing here.

    Quoted message said:

    Who are you? Where do you live?

    Why do you need to know?

    He does not need to know. The "who are you?" BS is some of the worst BS
    on Usenet.

    Quoted message said:

    Wanna publish it on FreeRepublic and see how
    much hate mail you can direct at me and my family?

    Quoted message said:

    Why are you afraid to post under your real
    name?

    Why do you need to know my real name?

    It's just BU**SH**.

    Now, _that's_ funny.

  9. Bill Sornson said:

    I just think it's cowardly to post inflamatory TROLLS under an anonymous
    username. Many others (even liberals like JB and FK) seem to agree.

    What's next, "nyah nyah nyah nyah, nyah -nyah, I'm rubber, you're
    glue"?

    Iraq: 2,720 of our troops dead- ten more just since the beginning of
    this thread. Just think about it: while this argument has been going
    on, ten more US troops were killed in Iraq. Ten more lives of brave
    Americans gone forever. And your best response is to call me a troll. I
    would like for you to tell me something that would at least pretend to
    suggest that there is a reason for continuing to send our men and women
    to die in Iraq.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.