Re: Open Challenges to All Science Bigots!

Quoted message said:

It appears that we have another person here on the ng trying to connect
dots with a spray gun.

I think it serves as a model for his brain function. Kind of spattered
all over the place. LOL...it's not that he's stupid that's so
depressing but that he such an [censored] to boot. Poor guy.

George M. Carter

Quoted message said:

It appears that we have another person here on the ng trying to connect
dots with a spray gun.

I am nolonger a regular here on these ngs because my web site became
independent from the need to post here years ago. 🙂

http://naturalhealthperspective.com/

It has a Google pagerank of 6/10 and a Alexa traffic ranking of
715,000.
http://info.alexa.com/data/details?p=TBChrome_T_t_40_L1&amzn_id=alexa65-tb-20&url=http://contact.naturalhealthperspective.com/viewedby.html

I am in the process of making a few slight changes to my web site
design that should boost my Google pagerank to 7/10 and dramatically
increase hits, of course.

I connected the dots years ago. Now, I am filling them in with color.
🙂
--
John Gohde

Yes, you used to splash your web pages in every message, which some other
trolls have practice in common, including a tactic to reply to most posts
with useless childish retorts, the more to increase potential traffic in
the cascade of responses it generated. . Which causes one pause to wonder
if this latest flurry of disconnected/dismembered notions aren't a tactic
also.

"I am nolonger a regular here on these ngs because my web site
becameindependent from the need to post here years ago. 🙂"

"So, your point was?"

Apparently confirmed, a pr tactic, with a possible build up to
homopathetic "natural" science tout in progress.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

"I am nolonger a regular here on these ngs because my web site
becameindependent from the need to post here years ago. 🙂"

Yes, you used to splash your web pages in every message, which some other
trolls have practice in common, including a tactic to reply to most posts
with useless childish retorts, the more to increase potential traffic in
the cascade of responses it generated. . Which causes one pause to wonder
if this latest flurry of disconnected/dismembered notions aren't a tactic
also.

Average successful requests per day: 562 in September 2004.

Sep/ 1/04: 465: :
Sep/ 2/04: 532:
Sep/ 3/04: 419:
Sep/ 4/04: 395:
Sep/ 5/04: 351:
Sep/ 6/04: 487:
Sep/ 7/04: 556:
Sep/ 8/04: 503:
Sep/ 9/04: 520:
Sep/10/04: 430:
Sep/11/04: 418:
Sep/12/04: 388:
Sep/13/04: 648:
Sep/14/04: 518:
Sep/15/04: 571:
Sep/16/04: 605:
Sep/17/04: 441:
Sep/18/04: 343:
Sep/19/04: 374:
Sep/20/04: 557:
Sep/21/04: 719:
Sep/22/04: 640:
Sep/23/04: 600:
Sep/24/04: 886:
Sep/25/04: 505:
Sep/26/04: 683:
Sep/27/04: Mon 1109:
Sep/28/04: Tues 1046:
Sep/29/04: 588:
Sep/30/04: 568:
Oct/ 1/04: 437:
Oct/ 2/04: 348:
Oct/ 3/04: 346:
Oct/ 4/04: 424: and counting

So, your point was?
--
John Gohde

Quoted message said:

http://naturalhealthperspective.com/

It has a Google pagerank of ... and a Alexa traffic ranking of
715,000.
http://info.alexa.com/data/details?p=TBChrome_T_t_40_L1&amzn_id=alexa65-tb-20&url=http://contact.naturalhealthperspective.com/viewedby.html

I recently have discovered that my web site in Alexa under the
Open Directory Project category of

Quoted message said:

Health > Alternative > Holistic and Integrated Medicine

is ranked as the 6th most popular web site on the entire Internet. 🙂
http://www.alexa.com/browse/general?catid=7318&mode=general

Within the next six months I expect to move up to number 5 as I am
adding a health blog as well as the Wikiproject on Alternative
Medicine to my site.

I created the Wikiproject on Alternative Medicine on another web site,
and now I will simply copy it to my site under an open documentation
license. This will mean another 30 or 40 web pages to my web site, at
the very least.
--
John Gohde

"I recently have discovered that my web site in Alexa under the
Open Directory Project category of

Quoted message said:

Health > Alternative > Holistic and Integrated Medicine

is ranked as the 6th most popular web site on the entire Internet. 🙂"

By definition there is a sixth in every category, no matter how fringe or
niche or wierd it may be. As noted before, your recent reappearence on
the ng is related to resuming spam promoting activity for your web site.

Quoted message said:

As noted before, your recent reappearence on
the ng is related to resuming spam promoting activity for your web site.

Obviously, discussions about web site optimization in Goggle go way
over your pea brain. I am not really surprised, since you know
absolutely nothing about that whole foods web site you just introduced
to smn.

Tying to spam that site, Toad? I think you failed.

Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
--
john gohde

"Obviously, discussions about web site optimization in Goggle go way
over your pea brain. I am not really surprised, since you know
absolutely nothing about that whole foods web site you just introduced
to smn.

Tying to spam that site, Toad? I think you failed."

Ah, confession time,"optimization", interpretation - learning how to
manipulate the search rules in order to make it seem one's site is of more
intrest then is reality. The food list was a in a news article, if
recalled correctly, one of many covering a whole range of topics that I
post on a regular basis; and not repeated postings and search enjine
manipulation or repeated references in multiple posts on a list of
crossposted newsgroups to generate traffic to one's web page. Speaking of
which, a really outstanding exciting example of "so what's else is new"
set of info , thank ya very much.

Quoted message said:

Ah, confession time,"optimization", interpretation - learning how to
manipulate the search rules in order to make it seem one's site is of more
intrest then is reality.

Actually, I think that is the definition for a PhD. 🙂

A doctor is a total idiot, just like you, who knows how to manipulate
the system in order to make everybody else think that they are a lot
smarter and more educated than they actually are. 🙁

Now back to Google and Alexa. I find it interesting to observe the
world around me. Apparently, scientists like you do NOT! You have my
condolences, Mark. 🙁

The #1 rated site at Alexa is now:
http://www.holisticmed.com/
with a score of 93,774.

With http://nccam.nih.gov/ now in second place. This leads me to
believe that Alexa is even more inaccurate than Google is.

User Review for holisticmed.com at Amazon.com:
"It is more than apparant that they have way too much time on there
hands. If you are looking for facts I suggest skipping this "urban
legend" site...and go straight to the source."

I agree, completely. I looked at http://www.holisticmed.com/ and it
contains mostly out of date garbage. It has a lot of web pages on
Yahoo Groups and Newsgroups. So, how does this site rate a 93,774 and
millions of hits?

It seems to me, that the answer must be because it has a lot of web
pages that contain a lot of keywords. My adding the project on
alternative medicine to my web site should thus produce the same
results, only with better quality information.

While everyone marvels at Google, they are actually the party most
responsible for dropping page content as the most important part of
the rating process. When you do a search in Google, the results that
show up first are from the most popular sites rather than from web
pages with the most relevant page content. Thanks to Googles patented
PageRank search algorithm.

Now, thanks to Google, the name of the game is getting others to link
to your home page. The more phony links you have, the higher you are
rated. Page content means next to nothing.

The situation is even more funny when you consider the number of
advertisers and Spammers making big bucks off these two phony systems
used by Google and Alexa.

Just thought that you might want to know.
--
john gohde

Quoted message said:

I agree, completely. I looked at http://www.holisticmed.com/ and it
contains mostly out of date garbage. It has a lot of web pages on
Yahoo Groups and Newsgroups. So, how does this site rate a 93,774 and
millions of hits?

It seems to me, that the answer must be because it has a lot of web
pages that contain a lot of keywords. My adding the project on
alternative medicine to my web site should thus produce the same
results, only with better quality information.

I was the mastermind of the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine at
Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

I modeled this project after their project on Buddhism.

I left these ngs for Wikipedia because the interaction between the
editors was more interesting than these two dimensional ngs.
Wikipedia is basically moderated by a bunch of science bigots. You
people should really feel at home there. The science bigots at
Wikipedia finally got around to lobotomizing the WikiProject on
Alternative Medicine. But, thanks to the GNU free documentation
project a dozen or so mirror sites are still carrying the project as I
had originally designed the interface (after the project on Buddhism).
These mirror sites were created by others, not to promote free
encyclopedias on the web as Jimbo 'the Bimbo' claims to be promoting,
but because these mirror sites are an easy way to build up PageRank
and attract the hits that sells advertising

So, you guys should thank Wikipedia, for keeping me busy for several
months. Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

Besides me, quite a few other editors worked on the project. Most
notably an expert on Traditional Chinese Medicine organized all the
material on TCM. So, the material is actually quite good and slanted
towards a very dry science viewpoint.

I am almost finished redesigning the interface to what I am calling a
dictionary on alternative medicine. Calling it a dictionary should
really [censored] the bigots at Wikipedia. My interface will end up
being about 200K in size. So, I will split it up into 3 or 4 separate
web pages. Virtually every keyword remotely related to alternative
medicine will be on these pages. My dictionary will be quite unique
as it is a consolidation of 4 separate indexes at Wikipedia.

Then at my leisure, I can gradually translate selected articles
removing their science bias. Ha, ... Hah, Ha! The advantage being
that since these articles are already written, adding more web pages
will be very easy to do.

Instead of wasting time fighting with those science bigots at
Wikipedia, I will be spending my time improving my website selecting
from thousands of older versions of their articles. The idiots at
Wikipedia are still wasting their time making endless changes to all
their articles.
--
john gohde

Such already exists, as do other large such databases.

"I am almost finished redesigning the interface to what I am calling a
dictionary on alternative medicine. Calling it a dictionary should"

Quoted message said:

Such already exists, as do other large such databases.

"I am almost finished redesigning the interface to what I am calling a
dictionary on alternative medicine. Calling it a dictionary should"

Really?

A-holes like you are a dime a dozen too. But, that don't stop the
universities from cranking out more idiots each year.

You have my condolences, Toad.
--
john gohde