Ben C said:A Muzi said:Quoted message said:> Peter Cole <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> Cross-drilled seems to be more about looks than anything else. "Vented"
>> or "ventilated" rotors are another matter. They appear to be reasonably
>> effective, but it's not a *huge* effect (+40%, rather than 100%).
Quoted message said:Robert Lorenzini <[email hidden]> wrote:
> Vented (cross-drilled or slotted) rotors came from racing brakes
> which use pads that boil gasses under heat. This is most noticeable
> when bedding green pads and they act just like a tire hydroplaning
> until most of the volatiles have disapated.
Michael Press said:What is the chemical composition of the boiling gasses?
Do the boiling gasses come from the pads?
Counterintuitive, isn't it? This guy thinks it happens:
http://www.innerauto.com/Auto_Part/Brake_Disc/
I'm not convinced ('gas' goes in the little hole??) or that taking one's
foot off a brake can break it.
If gas did come off the pad where it touched the disk then it would have
nowhere to go except to try and squeeze round the edge of the pad or
build up into a sort of bubble. Either way the gas pressure would try to
push pad and disk apart. The holes would prevent that happening.
So I can see how the holes would work if the gas is there.
And just because I don't know what gas would come off brake pads doesn't
mean no gas does. After all what I don't know about brake pads would
fill a book.
Dear Ben,
If you google for "disc brakes" "outgas" -excessive, you'll eliminate
much of the echoing of a familiar passage.
Browsing will suggest that there's some oversimplification of an
apparently problem well-known from the 1960s.
People often mention problems with organic pads that tended to outgas
on Formula One cars with early disc brakes.
The trouble was not that the gas pushed the pad away from the rotor.
What happened was that at high temperatures, the gas and the particles
eroding from the pad would mix and form a slick surface--a horrible
glazing effect rather than a gas layer.
Drilling holes through the discs may allow the gas and powdered
residue to escape before forming a film on the pad, or the holes may
simply help to scrape the stuff off, leaving a clean pad surface to
press against the rotor.
Many articles claim that modern pads have eliminated this problem and
that the drilling is now merely cosmetic.
Other articles suggest that competition level braking can still lead
to the problem.
Here's a typical passage leading up to a description of the problem in
the last sentence:
"Manufacturers define the performance -- the grippiness -- of their
brakepads by measuring the Mu, a function of the material coefficient
of friction over temperature. Pads are said to have rising, linear or
digressive rates, based on the Mu. A digressive rate pad means you
have to push harder to maintain the friction of the brakepad on the
rotor. A rising rate means you have to push less as the braking effect
increases. A linear rate means you maintain the same pressure. The
friction increases with temperature in a rising rate pad. Linear Mu
means the friction value is maintained as the temperature increases.
Many performance pads show rising friction values as the temperature
goes up, then drop off as the temperature reaches a point where the
pad outgasses, and powders, reducing the friction with the breakdown
film."
http://www.lemd.com/motorsport/previous.cfm?id=25
So it doesn't seem to be a matter of the gas pressing the pad away
from the rotor. It's the combination of very hot gas and powdered pad
forming a glaze on the surface of the pad.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel