Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Run Flat tires

Started by Erik Freitag · · Last activity · 8 posts · 403 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 December 2004
Last activity
14 December 2004
Original author
Erik Freitag
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
403
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Lee Lindquist said:

    Is there such a thing as run flat tires for bicycles?

    Possibly separate topic - how do the automotive run-flats work?

  2. "Erik Freitag" wrote: (clip) how do the automotive run-flats work?
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I believe they rely on sidewalls that are stiff enough to hold the weight of
    the car without collapsing completely. This idea, applied here, would
    result in a pretty heavy tire.

    Years ago I recall a tire that had a double wall, with a vent between the
    inner and outer chambers. If the tire started to deflate, this vent was
    supposed to close, allowing the tire to hold air in the inner chamber. The
    design did not survive the test of time.

  3. Erik Freitag said:
    Lee Lindquist said:

    Is there such a thing as run flat tires for bicycles?

    Possibly separate topic - how do the automotive run-flats work?

    There are two types that I can recall. One uses an ultra-low-profile
    tire and wheel assembly with a high-rigidity sidewall which will
    permit the tire to continue to function when deflated. The other
    relies on an inner structure to support the tread at an intermediate
    point of pseudo-inflation. Both have speed restrictions, IIRC.

    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/runflat/runflat.jsp

    Neither tech holds much promise for bike tires in applications where
    weight and ride quality are important factors.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  4. Werehatrack said:
    Erik Freitag said:
    Lee Lindquist said:

    Is there such a thing as run flat tires for bicycles?

    Possibly separate topic - how do the automotive run-flats work?

    There are two types that I can recall. One uses an ultra-low-profile
    tire and wheel assembly with a high-rigidity sidewall which will
    permit the tire to continue to function when deflated. The other
    relies on an inner structure to support the tread at an intermediate
    point of pseudo-inflation. Both have speed restrictions, IIRC.

    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/runflat/runflat.jsp

    Neither tech holds much promise for bike tires in applications where
    weight and ride quality are important factors.

    I'd think the second approach would have some potential for
    commuter bikes. I've ridden for up to 6 miles on a totally
    flat bike tire and it didn't result in any damage to either
    the tire or the rim (even the tube was patchable), but the
    ride felt very unstable at any speed over about 12 mph.
    Shouldn't take much of an inner hard foam support to improve
    the stability enough to make for a reasonable ride at slightly
    reduced speed. The main technical issue I see is to allow
    for easy mounting and demounting of the tire.

    I don't see there being a sufficient demand for such a design
    in the US, but possibly for the European and Asian markets.

  5. Try
    http://www.greentyre.com/eng/index2.php
    Alan Acock

  6. On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:37:52 -0800, Peter <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Werehatrack said:


    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/runflat/runflat.jsp

    Neither tech holds much promise for bike tires in applications where
    weight and ride quality are important factors.

    I'd think the second approach would have some potential for
    commuter bikes. I've ridden for up to 6 miles on a totally
    flat bike tire and it didn't result in any damage to either
    the tire or the rim (even the tube was patchable), but the
    ride felt very unstable at any speed over about 12 mph.
    Shouldn't take much of an inner hard foam support to improve
    the stability enough to make for a reasonable ride at slightly
    reduced speed. The main technical issue I see is to allow
    for easy mounting and demounting of the tire.

    There's a bigger one; the support structure must be firmly attached to
    the rim or it will tend to creep around it when running deflated; if
    it's internal to the tube, this will shear the valve stem off in short
    order. Mark the tire's position on a rim sometime, ride it for a
    block or so with it deflated, and then look at the tire's new
    position. Now consider what would happen to the tube if it wasn't
    free to flop around in there as the tire is squirming.

    The solid tires used on cheap hand trucks exhibit the same failing;
    they squirm around the rim while rotating. In some cases, the inner
    surface wears out before the outer.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  7. Alan C. Acock said:

    Try
    http://www.greentyre.com/eng/index2.php
    Alan Acock

    That does, indeed, look like the kind that was on the Trek that I got
    to ride once. Once was enough. No, thank you, I'll stay with what I
    have.

    I note that in their FAQ, they state that the tires are made of
    microcellular polyurethane; to me, that's one more fatal flaw, as
    there is a fungus that is becoming increasingly common which eats
    polyurethane. I've had a number of dead-blow hammers, squeegee blades
    and urethane screwdriver grips fall to bits after being attacked by
    that organism, some as early as 18 months after purchase.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  8. Werehatrack said:

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:37:52 -0800, Peter <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Werehatrack said:

    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/runflat/runflat.jsp

    Neither tech holds much promise for bike tires in applications where
    weight and ride quality are important factors.

    I'd think the second approach would have some potential for
    commuter bikes. I've ridden for up to 6 miles on a totally
    flat bike tire and it didn't result in any damage to either
    the tire or the rim (even the tube was patchable), but the
    ride felt very unstable at any speed over about 12 mph.
    Shouldn't take much of an inner hard foam support to improve
    the stability enough to make for a reasonable ride at slightly
    reduced speed. The main technical issue I see is to allow
    for easy mounting and demounting of the tire.

    There's a bigger one; the support structure must be firmly attached to
    the rim or it will tend to creep around it when running deflated

    Sure, but that was already part of the design in the automotive
    system you cited earlier: "when the tire loses pressure, it rests on a
    support ring *attached* to the wheel."
    The difference with a bicycle wheel is that I'd require the tire
    to be easily replaceable with hand tire levers rather than
    needing power tools and it would be nice if the modified rim
    and support structure would work with conventional tires.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.