There is no single thing. When scientists started looking around the
world at food traditions they spotted food patterns, which in
combination provided a sound nutrition. For example, the native
american diet in many places where farming was done was based on
beans, corn, varieties of squash and other fewer veggies and some
meat. In some places such as the astecs in mexico meat was rare as a
common food and used the corn/bean/squash combination almost
exclusively. The rice, soy bean, veggie combination with little meat
is an example in the e. asian cultural area. These provided less
complete sources of proteins that when combined were complete and the
veggies and other such provided vital vitamin/minerals when combined.
Potatoes were part of such a combination in s. america and in the
irish case. The potatoe is a fine source when all of it is used,
excessive carbs or any other macro source only becomes a problem if
too much of any one is used to the detriment of some vita/minerals and
other nutritional factors such as antioxs etc.; and of course the real
problem is eating too much such that calories eaten exceed the amount
of energy required for a given level of physical activity.
Quoted message said:I'm pretty much broke all the time and I try to get enough protein and
carbs thru veggies and grains (and meat every once and a while). Well
what I was wondering is -- is there a food out there that comes close
to perfection nutritionally wise, something that you could take out in
the woods and live on for a few months without problems? Also, are
potatoes good or bad? I thought they were healthy but this low carb
thing has really confused me.
ThanksGabe Elias