Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: When things go wrong

Started by Dave Vandervies · · Last activity · 14 posts · 274 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 September 2005
Last activity
8 September 2005
Original author
Dave Vandervies
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
274
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,
    Fritz M <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [moved to top]

    Quoted message said:

    {r.b.tech might be the more appropriate group to post this to.}

    Crosspost added.
    For the new readers: Went over the handlebars today after hitting a bump
    or hole in the ground (not sure which), noticed that a front brake got
    wedged under the rim of the wheel (which I suspect is what put me over
    the handlebars), now I'm trying to figure out how it got there before
    the bike went down.
    The long version (including the story with details of exactly what
    happened and commentary not directly related to that question) should
    be findable at
    http:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    Dave Vandervies said:

    ... it turns out that one
    of my front brake pads somehow got wedged under the rim of the wheel,

    Quoted message said:

    What would have caused the brake
    to get wedged in there in the first place?

    I'm not picturing "under the rim of the wheel." Where is the brake pad
    wedged?

    With the friction surface facing the spokes and the top against the part
    opposite the tire's road contact surface (at the outer end of the spokes).
    It was still the rubber part of the brake pad in contact with the wheel
    at that point, just not the part that's normally used for braking,
    and it was still attached to the rest of the brake assembly as well.

    These are fork-mounted cantilever brakes, so it was just the one "arm"
    assembly getting pushed in farther than it should have and stuck there
    rather than putting the friction surface against the edge of the rim
    (where the cable pull would normally put it).

    Quoted message said:

    Did the brake pad(s) come out and and get wedged between the
    wheel and the fork?

    No, still attached to the brake (which was still attached to the fork
    and in the right position, just turned too far in on the axis it pivots
    around in normal operation) and not moved along the circle of the rim.
    (I think that was me not being clear - the pad was the part that was
    actually in contact with the wheel, but the entire brake assembly on
    that side was stuck in that position.)

    Quoted message said:

    Or did the brakes bend so that the pads are rubbing
    on the tire? If so, what portion of the tire?

    Nope, as far as I could tell it wasn't bent, and it wasn't actually
    in contact with the tire, it was the inner rim (underneath the tire).
    As noted above, these are cantilever brakes, so each pad and brake
    arm assembly can be moved independently, and it was just one side that
    was stuck.

    dave

    --
    Dave Vandervies [email hidden]

    If in doubt, go round in circles.
    --Richard Heathfield in comp.lang.c

  2. Dave Vandervies said:

    For the new readers: Went over the handlebars today after hitting a
    bump or hole in the ground (not sure which), noticed that a front
    brake got wedged under the rim of the wheel (which I suspect is what
    put me over the handlebars), now I'm trying to figure out how it got
    there before the bike went down.

    Quoted message said:

    The long version (including the story with details of exactly what
    happened and commentary not directly related to that question)
    should be findable at

    Quoted message said:

    http:[email hidden]

    Commenting on the basis of the short synopsis..., I am aware of brake
    pop-under ability of cantilever brakes, something to which V-brakes
    are more immune because their levers would hit the tire first.

    The cantilever brake boss/pivot is far enough to the side to allow a
    wheel with a large MTB tire to be easily removed. A straight line
    drawn from the pivot to the braking surface of the rim lies at about
    45 degrees to the wheel central plane, so the motion of the pad is
    downward at that angle. With pad wear, and no vertical adjustment,
    brake shoes can dive past the braking surface. Because this occurs
    during hard braking, the brake shoe will not return on its own return
    spring, and wikk remain locked under the bed of the rim by the metal
    brake pad holder.

    In the event of an over-the-bars crash, the brake cable can snag on a
    foreign object or the riders arm as he dived forward. The force of
    that brake application can be enough to cause brake pad pop-under.

    Jobst Brandt

  3. J. Brandt said:

    ...
    The cantilever brake boss/pivot is far enough to the side to allow a
    wheel with a large MTB tire to be easily removed. A straight line
    drawn from the pivot to the braking surface of the rim lies at about
    45 degrees to the wheel central plane, so the motion of the pad is
    downward at that angle. With pad wear, and no vertical adjustment,
    brake shoes can dive past the braking surface. Because this occurs
    during hard braking, the brake shoe will not return on its own return
    spring, and wikk remain locked under the bed of the rim by the metal
    brake pad holder....

    S. C. Brown has an instructive drawing of a cantilever brake:
    <http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html>.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley

  4. J. Brandt said:

    ...
    The cantilever brake boss/pivot is far enough to the side to allow a
    wheel with a large MTB tire to be easily removed. A straight line
    drawn from the pivot to the braking surface of the rim lies at about
    45 degrees to the wheel central plane, so the motion of the pad is
    downward at that angle. With pad wear, and no vertical adjustment,
    brake shoes can dive past the braking surface. Because this occurs
    during hard braking, the brake shoe will not return on its own return
    spring, and wikk remain locked under the bed of the rim by the metal
    brake pad holder....

    S. C. Brown has an instructive drawing of a cantilever brake:
    <http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html>.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley

  5. Quoted message said:
    Dave Vandervies said:

    For the new readers: Went over the handlebars today after hitting a
    bump or hole in the ground (not sure which), noticed that a front
    brake got wedged under the rim of the wheel (which I suspect is what
    put me over the handlebars), now I'm trying to figure out how it got
    there before the bike went down.

    Quoted message said:

    The long version (including the story with details of exactly what
    happened and commentary not directly related to that question)
    should be findable at

    Quoted message said:

    http:[email hidden]

    Commenting on the basis of the short synopsis..., I am aware of brake
    pop-under ability of cantilever brakes, something to which V-brakes
    are more immune because their levers would hit the tire first.

    The cantilever brake boss/pivot is far enough to the side to allow a
    wheel with a large MTB tire to be easily removed. A straight line
    drawn from the pivot to the braking surface of the rim lies at about
    45 degrees to the wheel central plane, so the motion of the pad is
    downward at that angle. With pad wear, and no vertical adjustment,
    brake shoes can dive past the braking surface. Because this occurs
    during hard braking, the brake shoe will not return on its own return
    spring, and wikk remain locked under the bed of the rim by the metal
    brake pad holder.

    In the event of an over-the-bars crash, the brake cable can snag on a
    foreign object or the riders arm as he dived forward. The force of
    that brake application can be enough to cause brake pad pop-under.

    Or it's possible that the bike simply landed on one of the front
    cantis, forcing the other end under the rim. Look for abrasions on
    the "outside end" of the canti arm - I'll be there are some.

    Unless the OP grabbed all the brake available in the middle of the
    corner for some unknown reason, I can't imagine that it's a "brake
    failure" of any type.

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mark Hickey said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I am aware of brake
    pop-under ability of cantilever brakes,


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    In the event of an over-the-bars crash, the brake cable can snag on a
    foreign object or the riders arm as he dived forward. The force of
    that brake application can be enough to cause brake pad pop-under.

    Quoted message said:

    Or it's possible that the bike simply landed on one of the front
    cantis, forcing the other end under the rim. Look for abrasions on
    the "outside end" of the canti arm - I'll be there are some.

    I'm beginning to think it's this. I walked through the same spot I went
    over the bars later this afternoon and checked the ground, and there's
    a fairly deep hole (deeper than I'd noticed because the grass growing in
    it is cut almost level), so I wonder if that might've been what actually
    put me over the bars and landing on the brake is what made it pop under.

    (Is an over-the-bars crash consistent with what's expected to happen
    when the front wheel hits too steep an upslope? I know it's a Bad Thing
    to have happen, but this would (if it was that) be the first time I've
    done it, so I don't have much to go by.)

    I've already taken the bike in to the shop to get the wheel replaced,
    but when I get it back I'll have to remember to check the brake arm -
    I suspect I'll probably find some evidence of a hard landing there
    (though it might just be a bit of grass stuck in it, since that's what
    it landed on).

    Quoted message said:

    Unless the OP grabbed all the brake available in the middle of the
    corner for some unknown reason, I can't imagine that it's a "brake
    failure" of any type.

    Nope, quite sure I didn't touch the brake at all. I'd assumed that
    something with the bump it took caused the brake to go wrong (which then
    caused the flip over the bars), but something else causing the flip and
    that pushing the brake under seems more likely, especially if there's
    a reasonable way that would happen and not a reasonable way to have
    hitting a bump cause the pop-under.

    Even if I'd hit the brake as hard as possible, that alone wouldn't've
    been enough to put me over the bars, since the old (steel) rims weren't
    playing all that nicely with the brake pads (hence replacing the wheel
    instead of trying to repair it).

    dave

    --
    Dave Vandervies [email hidden]
    If you find misleading, off-topic and partly incorrect information given by an
    individual having horrible misconceptions about how C works helpful: your
    decision. Just be prepared for others to disagree. --Irrwahn Grausewitz, CLC

  7. "Dave Vandervies" wrote: (clip) (Is an over-the-bars crash consistent with
    what's expected to happen when the front wheel hits too steep an upslope?
    (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    When I first put Rock Shocks on my mountain bike, I expected too much of it.
    I tried to ride over a square wooden beam without slowing down, and I endoed
    over the bars. The front wheel stops, and everything else keeps moving,
    causing your center of gravity to rise and rotate around the front axle. I
    had to go to my optometrist and have my glasses straightened.

  8. (Dave Vandervies) said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    Mark Hickey <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Unless the OP grabbed all the brake available in the middle of the
    corner for some unknown reason, I can't imagine that it's a "brake
    failure" of any type.

    Nope, quite sure I didn't touch the brake at all. I'd assumed that
    something with the bump it took caused the brake to go wrong (which then
    caused the flip over the bars), but something else causing the flip and
    that pushing the brake under seems more likely, especially if there's
    a reasonable way that would happen and not a reasonable way to have
    hitting a bump cause the pop-under.

    I suspect it was just "geometry" that put you over the bars.

    Your bike has "automatic stability" because the tire is touching the
    ground BEHIND the steering axis (look down along the center of your
    bike's head tube and you'll see that the wheel is "trailing behind"
    the steering axis, much like a grocery cart wheel).

    When you hit that bump, chances are the contact was AHEAD of the
    steering axis, which would try to force the wheel to turn to the side
    (which would cause an immediate endo).

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

  9. Dave Vandervies said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    Fritz M <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [moved to top]

    Quoted message said:

    {r.b.tech might be the more appropriate group to post this to.}

    Crosspost added.


    stuff snipped..

    poorly set up cantis are more prone to this than correctly set up ones
    ... this becomes even more true as they wear. If they aren't set up like
    the pic on sheldons site (in another post) or in the Shimano
    instructions then they are wrong.

    Quoted message said:

    From my experience with London Ontario Bike stores I'd bet they were


    wrong.

  10. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mark Hickey said:

    I suspect it was just "geometry" that put you over the bars.

    Your bike has "automatic stability" because the tire is touching the
    ground BEHIND the steering axis (look down along the center of your
    bike's head tube and you'll see that the wheel is "trailing behind"
    the steering axis, much like a grocery cart wheel).

    When you hit that bump, chances are the contact was AHEAD of the
    steering axis, which would try to force the wheel to turn to the side
    (which would cause an immediate endo).

    I'm pretty sure that's what happened. Thanks for the explanation -
    I'd worked out the self-stabilizing under normal conditions but wasn't
    sure what the failure mode was when the contact point gets ahead of the
    steering axis. Now I know both on the theory side and from personal
    experience.

    dave

    --
    Dave Vandervies [email hidden]
    Of all possible chronic diseases, it was probably inevitable that
    I'd get the one with Shiny! toys.
    --Colin Andrew Percival in the scary devil monastery

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    poorly set up cantis are more prone to this than correctly set up ones
    .. this becomes even more true as they wear. If they aren't set up like
    the pic on sheldons site (in another post) or in the Shimano
    instructions then they are wrong.

    Since I'd had it adjusted recently, and it had to put a pretty serious
    bend in the wheel to get where it ended up, I'm pretty sure it wasn't
    because it was set up wrong.

    Quoted message said:

    From my experience with London Ontario Bike stores I'd bet they were
    wrong.

    I'm not in London, either.

    dave

    --
    Dave Vandervies [email hidden]
    Of all possible chronic diseases, it was probably inevitable that
    I'd get the one with Shiny! toys.
    --Colin Andrew Percival in the scary devil monastery

  12. When things go wrong, as they sometimes will,
    When the road you're trudging seems all up hill,
    When the funds are low and the debts are high
    And you want to smile, but you have to sigh,
    When care is pressing you down a bit,
    Don't come whining to me; I don't give a [censored].

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bob the Cow said:

    When things go wrong, as they sometimes will,
    When the road you're trudging seems all up hill,
    When the funds are low and the debts are high
    And you want to smile, but you have to sigh,
    When care is pressing you down a bit,
    Don't come whining to me; I don't give a [censored].

    Actually, it was more of a "When things go wrong, after I've dealt
    with any immediate problems and figured out What Not To Do Again, the
    engineer in me still isn't happy until I've figured out all the details
    of everything that happened".

    dave

    --
    Dave Vandervies [email hidden]
    People who are *really good* can do awesome things with C++. People who are
    not so good with C++ produce awe of a ... different ... kind.
    --Michael Hudson in the scary devil monastery

  14. "Dave Vandervies" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, it was more of a "When things go wrong, after I've dealt
    with any immediate problems and figured out What Not To Do Again, the
    engineer in me still isn't happy until I've figured out all the details
    of everything that happened".

    Well, yeah, but the first thing that popped into my "mind" when I saw the
    subject line was that poem. Sorry...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.