Euan wrote:
> Phillip Brown wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > any comments/recommendations on 53/39 vs 50/34 cranksets?
>
> This is a good article
> http://slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/gearing.html
>
> I moved from 53/39 to 50/34 a few months ago. I figured that I'd never
> run in to a situation where I was looking for a higher gear but there
> were plenty of situations where a lower gear would have been nice. But
> then again 99% of my riding involves panniers and a rack, on a light
> bike the gearing of a 50/34 might be too low.
> --
> Cheers
> Euan
gday,
yeah i went from 53/39 to 50/34 in nov last year..
just replaced my fsa normal cranks with fsa compact..no other changes
required (running ultegra 9speed)
it'll probably take some getting used to if you race and tend to stick
with a certain gear during the race, you'll need to find that sweet
spot again..
i rode the pyrenees last year using regular crankset and 12/27, most
the other guys i rode with either had triples or compact cranks and it
really showed
at the moment, riding mt dandy i use the compact and a 12/21
cassette..its just fine
would not go back to regular crankset