Bill Sornson said:
Chalo said:
For Shimano cranks, I recommend drilling out the bolts and prying the
arms off with a crowbar. Be sure to recycle them, as they can be
reprocessed into such useful items as single-serving beverage
containers and pie tins. ;^)
Totally unfair, even with the smiley. Just because /you/ weigh over 400
pounds and break...what, almost everything?
400 pounds _with_ a good strong bike, you mean. But your point is
taken.
Quoted message said:...doesn't mean that Shimano
cranks are weak or inferior. I've had XTR, Ultegra and DuraAce cranks, and
they've all been superb. Also true of many others riders I know.
I didn't suggest that Shimano cranks are weaker or more inferior than
most of the stuff that passes for acceptable on bikes these days; it's
not. It's just more distasteful.
Just like you're not going to see me pedaling around in Nike shoes, and
if you come to a party at my house you won't find any Coke or Pepsi to
put in your whiskey, and you won't see me stopped at Starbucks for my
java fix, you also won't find Shimano cranks on my bike. They may or
may not suck for measurable technical reasons, but they suck
nonetheless.
I am certain that Shimano Saint cranks would work just fine for me,
from a structural standpoint. But I'll be installing mine about the
same time I get the word "tool" tattooed across my forehead.
Quoted message said:If your criticism was directed at Octalink in particular, I've had no
problems with that, either, despite hearing the wives' tales.
Every shop owner I know says that they see a higher proportion of
trashed Octalink splines (compared to the total number of units) than
of square tapers. Maybe most Octalink users get good service from
their cranks, but on the whole they appear to be less reliable than
other systems. I can see why Shimano saw the merit in upgrading from
square tapers, but I consider Octalink a failed attempt.
At least they don't break off-- or anyway I've never heard of such an
instance.
Quoted message said:Light and stiff gets it done.
Add "strong", "durable", and "cost-effective" and I'm with you.
Chalo Colina