Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Replaceable vs. non-replaceable derailer hangers

Started by Paul Myron Hobson · · Last activity · 20 posts · 602 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 December 2007
Last activity
8 December 2007
Original author
Paul Myron Hobson
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
602
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The road bike market seems split as to whether or not a bike should have
    a replaceable rear der. hanger. Scouring some of the achieves, I found
    claims that replaceable hangers aren't sufficiently stiff and bend with
    normal use, which leads to poor indexing. To me, it seems like people
    might just be laying their bikes drive-side-down and slowly bending the
    hanger. Anyway...

    Shop guys:
    What are some of the pros of non-replaceable derailer hangers?
    ....Cons of replaceables?

    Thanks,
    \\paul
    --
    Paul Hobson
    change the f to ph...

  2. Paul Myron Hobson said:

    The road bike market seems split as to whether or not a bike should have
    a replaceable rear der. hanger. Scouring some of the achieves, I found
    claims that replaceable hangers aren't sufficiently stiff and bend with
    normal use, which leads to poor indexing.

    That is not my experience.

    Quoted message said:

    To me, it seems like people
    might just be laying their bikes drive-side-down and slowly bending the
    hanger. Anyway...

    Huh?

    Quoted message said:


    Shop guys:
    What are some of the pros of non-replaceable derailer hangers?
    ...Cons of replaceables?

    Replaceable hangers have a weak spot, so they snap when something
    happens saving the frame from any or further damage. You just replace
    the hanger as I did after a chainsuck incident a couple of weeks ago. No
    damage to the Al frame, just a 12 euro new hanger.

    Lou
    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu (http://www.nb.nu)

  3. Paul Myron Hobson said:

    The road bike market seems split as to whether or not a bike should have
    a replaceable rear der. hanger. Scouring some of the achieves, I found
    claims that replaceable hangers aren't sufficiently stiff and bend with
    normal use, which leads to poor indexing.

    That would be pompous [censored] on their part, Paul. If the bike's
    aluminum, they're a good idea, if steel, they aren't needed. Simple as
    that. Geez, you'd think people would just go all the way and start
    selling us vertically compliant versions....


  4. Quoted message said:


    That would be pompous [censored] on their part, Paul. If the bike's
    aluminum, they're a good idea, if steel, they aren't needed. Simple as
    that. Geez, you'd think people would just go all the way and start
    selling us vertically compliant versions....

    I saw a new bike at the LBS and when I asked about what's so great about it,
    the salesman said it was vertically compliant. What the heck does that mean?

  5. Pat said:
    Quoted message said:

    That would be pompous [censored] on their part, Paul. If the bike's
    aluminum, they're a good idea, if steel, they aren't needed. Simple as
    that. Geez, you'd think people would just go all the way and start
    selling us vertically compliant versions....

    I saw a new bike at the LBS and when I asked about what's so great about it,
    the salesman said it was vertically compliant. What the heck does that mean?

    Was this the guy:

    http://tinyurl.com/25ush3

    or:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/25ush3

  6. On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:16:55 -0600, "Pat" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    That would be pompous [censored] on their part, Paul. If the bike's
    aluminum, they're a good idea, if steel, they aren't needed. Simple as
    that. Geez, you'd think people would just go all the way and start
    selling us vertically compliant versions....

    I saw a new bike at the LBS and when I asked about what's so great about it,
    the salesman said it was vertically compliant. What the heck does that mean?

    Dear Pat,

    By "vertically compliant" the saleman meant that the bicycle's main
    frame bends or compresses a little as it hits bumps in the road,
    complying vertically with the bumps.

    The sarcastic phrase on RBT is "stiff but compliant," the point being
    that you can't make a frame that's both stiff and soft.

    With a double-diamond frame, the compliance for typical forces is
    usually impossible to measure without an impressive micrometer--the
    metal tubes of a bicycle's main frame triangles just don't bend up and
    down enough to be detected. They're in straight compression and
    tension, not bending sideways, so they tend to "comply" about as much
    as an anvil from an up-and-down point of view.

    The same main frame that's so stiff vertically can bend visibly
    _sideways_ as you pedal, but that's horizontal, not vertical. The
    chain doesn't have much leverage, but it does pull the drive side of
    the rear triangle sideways. Meanwhile, your weight on the pedal bends
    the slightly tilted frame from side to side. In other words, jumping
    up and down on an upright bicycle frame won't produce any noticeable
    bending, but you don't want to lay the same frame flat across two
    chairs and jump up and down on it.

    Inflated tires, handlebars, seats, and even wheels "comply vertically"
    far more than the main frame when you hit bumps. Sit on a bike, and
    you can see the tires flatten. Pull or push on the handlebar, and you
    can see it flex a little. Look up the calculations, and you'll find
    that the round metal rims flatten ever so slightly (about the
    thickness of a sheet of paper). But the double triangle doesn't bend
    even that much under a vertical load.

    One counter argument is that different frame materials can damp some
    vibrations (road buzz) just as a wooden baseball bat doesn't sting
    your hands as much as a metal bat.

    Another counter argument is that there can be much more "vertical
    compliance" (bending) when the fork is added to the main frame.

    But lowering tire pressure 5 psi would probably have a greater effect
    than anything claimed for magical forks and wonder frames.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  7. Ozark Bicycle said:
    Pat said:
    Quoted message said:

    That would be pompous [censored] on their part, Paul. If the bike's
    aluminum, they're a good idea, if steel, they aren't needed. Simple as
    that. Geez, you'd think people would just go all the way and start
    selling us vertically compliant versions....

    Quoted message said:

    I saw a new bike at the LBS and when I asked about what's so great about it,
    the salesman said it was vertically compliant. What the heck does that mean?

    Was this the guy:

    http://tinyurl.com/25ush3

    or:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/25ush3

    You get a full on Spanky and his Gang salute for that one!

    /me waves hand under chin

  8. landotter said:
    Paul Myron Hobson said:

    The road bike market seems split as to whether or not a bike should have
    a replaceable rear der. hanger. Scouring some of the achieves, I found
    claims that replaceable hangers aren't sufficiently stiff and bend with
    normal use, which leads to poor indexing.

    That would be pompous [censored] on their part, Paul. If the bike's
    aluminum, they're a good idea, if steel, they aren't needed. Simple as
    that. Geez, you'd think people would just go all the way and start
    selling us vertically compliant versions....

    but laterally stiff!

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when temperature
    differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can impart
    excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter

  9. Quoted message said:

    Shop guys:
    What are some of the pros of non-replaceable derailer hangers?
    ...Cons of replaceables?

    On mid-priced bikes, which are subject to more abuse than higher-end models,
    Trek uses replaceable derailleur hangers. On high-end road bikes, they still
    use non-replaceable versions. Why? Because they're more rigid and shift
    better. No other reason. My own experience bears this out.

    I should also point out that it's slightly misleading to say that the
    derailleur hangers on high-end Trek road bikes are non-replaceable. They can
    easily be replaced, but only at the factory (which does, in fact, lead to a
    fair amount of expense, time & effort, since you have to tear the frame
    down, ship it to Trek to be repaired, and then wait for it to come back and
    rebuild it).

    I can't speak of why other manufacturers do what they do; my familiarity is
    with Trek. And I know their engineers have been working on this issue for
    years, and have yet to come up with an adequate replacement for the current
    non-replaceable hanger. I've seen their testing jigs; they take this mission
    very seriously. For what it's worth, I'd rather they were replaceable, even
    at a slight decrease in shifting precision. After a while, you just get
    tired of having to tell the story.

    To answer a question not-yet-asked, we probably send 5-10 frames/year back
    to Trek for derailleur dropout replacement. Trek charges $75, UPS shipping
    is what really hurts, at $60 outbound, $20 return (the reason for the
    much-more-reasonable return charge is that Trek gets much better rates than
    individual shops... basically, UPS is in revenue-enhancement mode, and small
    shops have zero negotiating power with them, whereas Trek does much better,
    getting offers from multiple shippers (FedEx, UPS, DHL...).

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  10. Thanks, Carl. The salesman just looked at me exasperated and said, "You
    know! compliant!" and then he said, "All bicycle manufacturers will be going
    to this shape in the future!"

    BTW: it was the model called "Tarmac."

    Pat in TX

  11. Pat said:

    Thanks, Carl. The salesman just looked at me exasperated and said, "You
    know! compliant!" and then he said, "All bicycle manufacturers will be going
    to this shape in the future!"

    BTW: it was the model called "Tarmac."

    Pat in TX

    Whether you believe frames can be both or not (I happen to believe
    that they can, see Ibis Bow Ti), the way he exposed his reliance on
    catalog-speak is the rough equivalent of a guy at Foot Locker telling
    you that more expensive hightops will make you more comfortable and
    jump higher.

    At least Specialized has the marketing savvy to make the Roubaix
    model, which must be like a gravy train on biscuit wheels yet STIFF.

    This reminds me of a recent encounter at a decent, mid- to high-end
    shop here in NYC. I've got some well-used Ultegra 6500 9speed
    brifters. Lately, in cold weather, the right brifter doesn't always
    ratchet up. That is, when I push the brake lever to downshift, the
    ratchet won't catch. It's hardly uncommon, and I should flush the
    lever and see if I can extend it's life, but one day I happened to be
    walking around this shop and noticed that Tiagra was now 9 speed.

    A shop guy noticed I was eyeing a bike, and asked me if he could help.
    With SRAM's different pull ration and all, I thought it possible that
    maybe Shimano had changed as well and asked him if the Tiagra works
    with older 9 speed shifting systems, plus the price on just the right
    brifter. Clearly disappointed that I didn't want to just buy a whole
    new bike, he asked me which system and I said Ultegra 6500 9 speed. He
    begrudgingly asked the mechanic and, reporting back to me, said it
    would work but I don't want Tiagra. I asked him why, wondering if they
    had notoriously short lives, internals made of cardboard, wildly long
    throws or what? He replied, "You're going from a high level to a low
    level." I asked him to clarify the difference, to which he gave me an
    exasperated shrug and spat out "Listen, you have a race lever now,
    Tiagra is a recreational lever." I asked him what the price diff was
    between a new Tiagra and an unused 6500 and it was $100. I don't know
    if I wanted to beat him with a sock full of bb's for ignorance, or
    trying to bully me into overpaying for something I didn't need to thin
    their old stock.

    What a maroon.

    /s

  12. Quoted message said:

    This reminds me of a recent encounter at a decent, mid- to high-end
    shop here in NYC. I've got some well-used Ultegra 6500 9speed
    brifters. Lately, in cold weather, the right brifter doesn't always
    ratchet up. That is, when I push the brake lever to downshift, the
    ratchet won't catch. It's hardly uncommon, and I should flush the
    lever and see if I can extend it's life...

    Keep in mind that that's also the first sign of a cable that might be
    fraying inside the lever. You want to check for this possibility before
    anything else, because fishing a busted cable out of an STI lever can be a
    not-very-fun task. (Of course, I don't think it makes much difference
    whether the weather is warm or cold; I'm suggesting the weather could simply
    be a coincidence).

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    "Scott Gordo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Pat said:

    Thanks, Carl. The salesman just looked at me exasperated and said, "You
    know! compliant!" and then he said, "All bicycle manufacturers will be
    going
    to this shape in the future!"

    BTW: it was the model called "Tarmac."

    Pat in TX

    Whether you believe frames can be both or not (I happen to believe
    that they can, see Ibis Bow Ti), the way he exposed his reliance on
    catalog-speak is the rough equivalent of a guy at Foot Locker telling
    you that more expensive hightops will make you more comfortable and
    jump higher.

    At least Specialized has the marketing savvy to make the Roubaix
    model, which must be like a gravy train on biscuit wheels yet STIFF.

    This reminds me of a recent encounter at a decent, mid- to high-end
    shop here in NYC. I've got some well-used Ultegra 6500 9speed
    brifters. Lately, in cold weather, the right brifter doesn't always
    ratchet up. That is, when I push the brake lever to downshift, the
    ratchet won't catch. It's hardly uncommon, and I should flush the
    lever and see if I can extend it's life, but one day I happened to be
    walking around this shop and noticed that Tiagra was now 9 speed.

    A shop guy noticed I was eyeing a bike, and asked me if he could help.
    With SRAM's different pull ration and all, I thought it possible that
    maybe Shimano had changed as well and asked him if the Tiagra works
    with older 9 speed shifting systems, plus the price on just the right
    brifter. Clearly disappointed that I didn't want to just buy a whole
    new bike, he asked me which system and I said Ultegra 6500 9 speed. He
    begrudgingly asked the mechanic and, reporting back to me, said it
    would work but I don't want Tiagra. I asked him why, wondering if they
    had notoriously short lives, internals made of cardboard, wildly long
    throws or what? He replied, "You're going from a high level to a low
    level." I asked him to clarify the difference, to which he gave me an
    exasperated shrug and spat out "Listen, you have a race lever now,
    Tiagra is a recreational lever." I asked him what the price diff was
    between a new Tiagra and an unused 6500 and it was $100. I don't know
    if I wanted to beat him with a sock full of bb's for ignorance, or
    trying to bully me into overpaying for something I didn't need to thin
    their old stock.

    What a maroon.

    /s

  13. On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:30:11 -0500, Paul Myron Hobson

    may have said:

    The road bike market seems split as to whether or not a bike should have
    a replaceable rear der. hanger. Scouring some of the achieves, I found
    claims that replaceable hangers aren't sufficiently stiff and bend with
    normal use, which leads to poor indexing. To me, it seems like people
    might just be laying their bikes drive-side-down and slowly bending the
    hanger. Anyway...

    Shop guys:
    What are some of the pros of non-replaceable derailer hangers?

    None that I'm aware of, unless you include steel frames. A steel
    hanger (even one that's not trivially easy to replace) is hard to beat
    for repairability, even by comparison to a bolt-on replacement. Steel
    can almost always be bent back to a useful location, and a replacement
    tab can be brazed on with ease if the tab is just too far gone.

    Quoted message said:

    ...Cons of replaceables?

    Big problem: There's no standard design, and not all of them are easy
    to get. Bend or break the tab, and you might be off the bike for
    several days while a replacement is located and shipped in. (In some
    instances, a universal tab can be temorarily installed, but there are
    issues that can keep that from being a viable option.) Many
    replaceable dropout tabs are easier to break than a non-replaceable,
    which can put you entirely out of action in a fall or other mishap
    that might not have bent a regular tab...and then you're back to the
    "out of action until the replacement arrives" possibility already
    mentioned.

    Everything has trade-offs, but when it comes to aluminum frames, I'd
    rather have the replaceable dropout (and have a spare in my toolbox)
    than have to worry about the dropout getting mangled.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  14. On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:23:58 -0600, "Pat" <[email hidden]> may

    have said:

    Thanks, Carl. The salesman just looked at me exasperated and said, "You
    know! compliant!" and then he said, "All bicycle manufacturers will be going
    to this shape in the future!"

    Reminds me of the line a salesdroid used on my SO when she was
    shopping for a minivan a number of years ago. She was looking at (but
    fortunately did not buy) the Chevy Lumina, and she questioned the
    reasoning behind putting the tail lights high next to the windows.
    The salesthing promptly lied; he claimed it was a new requirement, and
    all of the vans would have to be that way soon. Having a functional
    sense of smell, she noticed the sudden intensification of a certain
    bovine-derived bucolic aroma in the vicinity, and beat a hasty retreat
    to a different dealership.

    Quoted message said:

    BTW: it was the model called "Tarmac."

    Ah. From Specialized, whose sales force have become world-class
    contenders for the coveted Legless Reptile Lubricant Prize. Between
    their Zertz (whose benefits they sing, but whose presence or absence
    no one seems to be able to reliably detect) and their other nebulous
    claims, they're bidding fair to sandblast the gloss off of what is
    otherwise a damned fine line of equipment. They really need to ditch
    the stupid hype and sell what they've actually got.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  15. On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:56:47 -0800, "Mike Jacoubowsky"

    may have said:

    ... UPS shipping
    is what really hurts, at $60 outbound, $20 return (the reason for the
    much-more-reasonable return charge is that Trek gets much better rates than
    individual shops... basically, UPS is in revenue-enhancement mode, and small
    shops have zero negotiating power with them, whereas Trek does much better,
    getting offers from multiple shippers (FedEx, UPS, DHL...).

    One caveat: IME, it is wiser to pay UPS $60 than to ship via FedEx
    ground for free when the item being shipped has any significant value.
    A business associate has over $2300 in unpaid claims pending with
    FedEx over lost and damaged ground shipments for the past year, and
    has recently swapped back to UPS for most of his shipping as a result.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  16. "Werehatrack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:30:11 -0500, Paul Myron Hobson

    may have said:

    The road bike market seems split as to whether or not a bike should have
    a replaceable rear der. hanger. Scouring some of the achieves, I found
    claims that replaceable hangers aren't sufficiently stiff and bend with
    normal use, which leads to poor indexing. To me, it seems like people
    might just be laying their bikes drive-side-down and slowly bending the
    hanger. Anyway...

    Shop guys:
    What are some of the pros of non-replaceable derailer hangers?

    None that I'm aware of, unless you include steel frames. A steel
    hanger (even one that's not trivially easy to replace) is hard to beat
    for repairability, even by comparison to a bolt-on replacement. Steel
    can almost always be bent back to a useful location, and a replacement
    tab can be brazed on with ease if the tab is just too far gone.

    Quoted message said:

    ...Cons of replaceables?

    Big problem: There's no standard design, and not all of them are easy
    to get. Bend or break the tab, and you might be off the bike for
    several days while a replacement is located and shipped in. (In some
    instances, a universal tab can be temorarily installed, but there are
    issues that can keep that from being a viable option.) Many
    replaceable dropout tabs are easier to break than a non-replaceable,
    which can put you entirely out of action in a fall or other mishap
    that might not have bent a regular tab...and then you're back to the
    "out of action until the replacement arrives" possibility already
    mentioned.

    Everything has trade-offs, but when it comes to aluminum frames, I'd
    rather have the replaceable dropout (and have a spare in my toolbox)

    Or in the bag under the saddle, as the replacement is pretty light.
    Kerry

  17. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ... UPS shipping
    is what really hurts, at $60 outbound, $20 return (the reason for the
    much-more-reasonable return charge is that Trek gets much better rates
    than
    individual shops... basically, UPS is in revenue-enhancement mode, and
    small
    shops have zero negotiating power with them, whereas Trek does much
    better,
    getting offers from multiple shippers (FedEx, UPS, DHL...).

    One caveat: IME, it is wiser to pay UPS $60 than to ship via FedEx
    ground for free when the item being shipped has any significant value.
    A business associate has over $2300 in unpaid claims pending with
    FedEx over lost and damaged ground shipments for the past year, and
    has recently swapped back to UPS for most of his shipping as a result.

    The NBDA (National Bicycle Dealer Association) e-list is littered with
    complaints about UPS not handling claims properly, typically choosing to
    drag them out so long that it's not worthwhile. And how did they do this
    without hurting the image of their own company? By creating a separate
    entity that just handles their shipping insurance. So if you complain to
    UPS, they say sorry, that's not us, it's a separate company handling the
    insurance. Yeah, right, separate company owned by UPS.

    As I said, it's all about revenue enhancement these days. The small guy gets
    stuck with the bills.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    "Werehatrack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:56:47 -0800, "Mike Jacoubowsky"

    may have said:

    ... UPS shipping
    is what really hurts, at $60 outbound, $20 return (the reason for the
    much-more-reasonable return charge is that Trek gets much better rates
    than
    individual shops... basically, UPS is in revenue-enhancement mode, and
    small
    shops have zero negotiating power with them, whereas Trek does much
    better,
    getting offers from multiple shippers (FedEx, UPS, DHL...).

    One caveat: IME, it is wiser to pay UPS $60 than to ship via FedEx
    ground for free when the item being shipped has any significant value.
    A business associate has over $2300 in unpaid claims pending with
    FedEx over lost and damaged ground shipments for the past year, and
    has recently swapped back to UPS for most of his shipping as a result.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  18. Werehatrack said:

    Ah. From Specialized, whose sales force have become world-class
    contenders for the coveted Legless Reptile Lubricant Prize. Between
    their Zertz (whose benefits they sing, but whose presence or absence
    no one seems to be able to reliably detect)

    What? Ah, googling. Well, it probably isn't the game you are talking
    about. Here it is. Oh, those silly plastic inserts in holes purposely
    placed in the stays, seatpost (there's a dumb idea; cut a hole in the
    seatpost, then fill it with plastic so you don't even save any weight).
    They claim great reductions in vibration, then point you to a graph.
    But the graph is not of how much the insert reduces vibration, but just
    compare the vibration (with or without insert? Who cares?) levels
    between the rear axle and the saddle, over a range of frequencies (0 to
    600 Hz). They claim 80% reduction -- maybe meaning over the entire
    range --- difficult to say since it's a logarithmic scale. But they
    don't compare to an old-technology zertless frame, so it's not a
    reduction based on the plastic insert.

    The best part is their "graphic demonstration", showing a bike
    supposedly bouncing along, wheels a blur of vibration, but the saddle
    absolutely still. Very realistic.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you
    that mine are all greater.
    -- A. Einstein


  19. Quoted message said:


    One caveat: IME, it is wiser to pay UPS $60 than to ship via FedEx
    ground for free when the item being shipped has any significant value.
    A business associate has over $2300 in unpaid claims pending with
    FedEx over lost and damaged ground shipments for the past year, and
    has recently swapped back to UPS for most of his shipping as a result.

    Oh. I am getting ready to box up a 27" TV set and ship it to another state.
    I was going to use FedEx, but now you've made me wonder....

  20. On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:47:49 -0500, "David L. Johnson"

    may have said:
    Werehatrack said:

    Ah. From Specialized, whose sales force have become world-class
    contenders for the coveted Legless Reptile Lubricant Prize. Between
    their Zertz (whose benefits they sing, but whose presence or absence
    no one seems to be able to reliably detect)

    What? Ah, googling. Well, it probably isn't the game you are talking
    about. Here it is. Oh, those silly plastic inserts in holes purposely
    placed in the stays, seatpost (there's a dumb idea; cut a hole in the
    seatpost, then fill it with plastic so you don't even save any weight).
    They claim great reductions in vibration, then point you to a graph.
    But the graph is not of how much the insert reduces vibration, but just
    compare the vibration (with or without insert? Who cares?) levels
    between the rear axle and the saddle, over a range of frequencies (0 to
    600 Hz). They claim 80% reduction -- maybe meaning over the entire
    range --- difficult to say since it's a logarithmic scale. But they
    don't compare to an old-technology zertless frame, so it's not a
    reduction based on the plastic insert.

    The best part is their "graphic demonstration", showing a bike
    supposedly bouncing along, wheels a blur of vibration, but the saddle
    absolutely still. Very realistic.

    Got it in one. Yes, that's one of their many attempts to market snake
    oil instead of bikes. If they didn't actually make a decent bicycle,
    I think their ludicrously overblown hype of obviously useless frills
    would have buried them long ago. I think the reason they're getting
    away with the patent-medicene-show junk is that their typical
    long-term customer pays no attention to the whizbang in their
    marketing.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.