Dan Daniel said:I'm not a racer and not up on all the aerodynamic and rolling
resistance issues. Somewhere there must be tests and solid info on
these kind of questions
There are tests, although I don't know the addresses to give you a
link, off the top of my head. However, the result is that, for a
given tire construction and a given pressure, and all else being
equal, a _wider_ tire has _less_ rolling resistance than a narrower
tire.
Of course, often all else is NOT equal -- you may look at a 28
that's good for 90 psi and a 23 that's good for 145 psi, and if you
intend to inflate to the rated max, then the 23 will probably have
less RR.
OTOH, if you're looking at a 28 and a 23 in the same brand and model
of tire, both with the same casing and pressure rating, and again
you intend to run at the same pressure regardless of tire, the 28
will have less RR.
RR (at least in slick tires) comes from the casing having to deform
to allow the contact patch. Since, at 100 psi, a tire with 100
pounds on it will have a nominal 1 square inch contact patch, a tire
with inch-wide tread will have an inch of it's sidewall required to
flex, while a tire with a half inch wide tread will require two
inches of it's sidewall to flex.
You can read all day about it with groups.google.com. Realistically,
if you've been happy/comfortable with your existing tires, I'd say
stick with them.
--
Rick Onanian