General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

roast bones before making beef broth?

Started by Richard McBeef · · Last activity · 23 posts · 321 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 April 2007
Last activity
19 April 2007
Original author
Richard McBeef
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
321
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–23 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. sf said:
    Quoted message said:
    Richard McBeef said:

    Why is it necessary to roast the bones before
    making a beef broth? I am curious as to what effect the roasting has?
    What would the difference be if the roasting were not done.

    Not 'Necessary' but possibly desirable.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maillard_reaction

    The jury's out regarding the best way forward Some say 'Roast', Some
    Say 'Don't Roast' and some say 'Roast some & don't roast the rest'.

    YMMV. For what it's worth, to date, I've roasted bones for all of my
    stock but the result tends to be a bit sweet. Must get around to
    trying the other way.


    Bone roasting won't affect the sweetness of your stock. Onions and
    carrots do that.

    Not sure that I agree, but I'm prepared to be convinced. My palate is
    pretty jaded but it sounds like a 'Fair Test' is required. I will
    acquire fresh bones and run a pan of each in parallel and will report
    back in due course.

    Regards
    JonH

  2. jmcquown said:
    Paul M. Cook said:

    "jmcquown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Richard McBeef wrote:
    > Why is it necessary to roast the bones before
    > making a beef broth? I am curious as to what effect the roasting
    > has? What would the difference be if the roasting were not done.

    > In article <[email hidden]>,
    > [email hidden]

    You're making fun of the assassinations of the students at V. Tech
    by using this ID?! What kind of a loser [censored] are you?! PLONK
    [censored]. And you may be complicit so I'm forwarding this to the
    FBI in Quantico. See how you feel about joking around now, [censored].

    Kudos for spotting that. I almost replied to the SOB before reading
    the posts. Sick [censored], indeed.

    Paul

    I can't take credit for first spotting it, but I DID report him to the FBI.
    I imagine they want to track and question anyone with even the most tenuous
    ties to this V. Tech assassin (keyword there being *ass*). Hopefully they
    will make this "joker's" life miserable for a while. Complicit or not, it's
    no joking matter. I can't believe some people think this is funny, I really
    can't. It's a tragedy. And this dillhole comes on here using that name and
    thinks it's funny? May they screw up the next 5 years of his life while he
    tries to explain his way out of it, that's what I hope for.

    Jill

    jeez, do you sic the f.b.i. on everyone who upsets you? (i'm sure
    they'll get right on it.) i better watch my p's and q's.

    your pal,
    (name withheld upon request)

  3. CliffMacgillivray said:
    jmcquown said:
    Paul M. Cook said:

    "jmcquown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > Richard McBeef wrote:
    >> Why is it necessary to roast the bones before
    >> making a beef broth? I am curious as to what effect the roasting
    >> has? What would the difference be if the roasting were not done.
    >> In article <[email hidden]>,
    >> [email hidden]
    > You're making fun of the assassinations of the students at V. Tech
    > by using this ID?! What kind of a loser [censored] are you?! PLONK
    > [censored]. And you may be complicit so I'm forwarding this to the
    > FBI in Quantico. See how you feel about joking around now, [censored].
    Kudos for spotting that. I almost replied to the SOB before reading
    the posts. Sick [censored], indeed.

    Paul

    I can't take credit for first spotting it, but I DID report him to the FBI.
    I imagine they want to track and question anyone with even the most tenuous
    ties to this V. Tech assassin (keyword there being *ass*). Hopefully they
    will make this "joker's" life miserable for a while. Complicit or not, it's
    no joking matter. I can't believe some people think this is funny, I really
    can't. It's a tragedy. And this dillhole comes on here using that name and
    thinks it's funny? May they screw up the next 5 years of his life while he
    tries to explain his way out of it, that's what I hope for.


    Jokes even in bad taste are not a crime. Fantasizing lengthy false
    imprisonment is odd. Definitely unamerican!
    Do you really think the fbi will investigate every bad joke related to
    this? If anything you have self identified yourself to the authorities
    as a bit dull.

    and if they find out she likes korean food, she's cooked.

    your pal,
    blake

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.