Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Schmidt SON / Light wiring question

Started by BobT · · Last activity · 14 posts · 1,167 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 November 2006
Last activity
28 November 2006
Original author
BobT
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,167
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am making plans to install lights on my new touring bike and connect them
    to a Schmidt hub dynamo.

    In researching this, I note that the Schmidt lights are supplied with
    "heavy duty coaxial cable" to connect to the dynamo. Why would shielded
    coaxial cable be needed to connect up a hub dynamo and lights?

    My current bike has a Shimano Nexus hub dynamo and a B&M Lumotech light
    that came from the bike factory wired with small gauge, simple, paired,
    parallel, zip type, cable.

    For my application (tail light and two independently switched front lights),
    I want to modify the wiring harnesses that come with the lights. I am
    wondering if it makes much difference what wire I use in this 6 volt, 3 watt
    system?

    Peter White Cycles has an excellent web site about bicycle lighting systems.
    I learned a lot about bicycle light systems there and I am buying the lights
    and dynamo from him. Despite this, here is an excerpt from his site about
    how to wire the lights he sells, "I frequently get phone calls or email
    from people who want to try a different way of connecting their lights,
    often through the use of their own switch box, and they want my advice. ...
    <snip> ... I only support using the Schmidt hub with the lights I sell and
    with the wiring pattern I recommend. If you would like to try something
    different, be my guest, but you're on your own." In light of this comment,
    I am posting my question here.

    BobT

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    BobT said:

    I am making plans to install lights on my new touring bike and
    connect them to a Schmidt hub dynamo.

    In researching this, I note that the Schmidt lights are supplied
    with "heavy duty coaxial cable" to connect to the dynamo. Why would
    shielded coaxial cable be needed to connect up a hub dynamo and
    lights?

    I don't know that it's "needed," it's just the wiring used by Schmidt.

    Quoted message said:

    My current bike has a Shimano Nexus hub dynamo and a B&M Lumotech
    light that came from the bike factory wired with small gauge, simple,
    paired, parallel, zip type, cable.

    I use a Lumotech Oval Plus with my Schmidt SON (both came indirectly
    from PJW via a local bike shop). It also is wired with coaxial wire.

    Quoted message said:

    For my application (tail light and two independently switched front
    lights), I want to modify the wiring harnesses that come with the
    lights. I am wondering if it makes much difference what wire I use
    in this 6 volt, 3 watt system?

    Hmmm. Except you're setting up more than 3W of power consumption- 5.4W
    or 6.6W. You'll want to check and make sure you'll have enough juice to
    run them all- at low speeds in particular.

  3. "Tim McNamara" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmmm. Except you're setting up more than 3W of power consumption- 5.4W
    or 6.6W. You'll want to check and make sure you'll have enough juice to
    run them all- at low speeds in particular.

    I've found several descriptions saying this will work - at Peter White's
    site:

    http://www.peterwhitecycles.com/wiringinstructions.asp

    and here:

    http://www.m-gineering.nl/son12vg.htm

    The Schmidt dynamo functions as a constant current device. You connect the
    2.4 watt primary headlight (B&M Lumotec N Plus in my case) in parallel with
    the 0.6 watt tail light (I'm using a B&M DToplight plus). You then connect
    the secondary 3 watt headlight (I'm using a Schimdt E6-z) in series with the
    other lights. With this setup, the dynamo produces 12 volts, 6 watts when a
    speed of about 10 m.p.h. is reached and powers all three lights
    satisfactorily. If riding continually at a slower speed, one switches off
    the secondary light because I'm told that one fully powered light is
    brighter than two under powered lights.

    Back to the wire question: I assume (often a mistake) that in this
    sophisticated, German engineered dynamo / light system, if coaxial cable is
    used it must be for some good reason, but what reason?

    BobT

  4. BobT said:


    Back to the wire question: I assume (often a mistake) that in this
    sophisticated, German engineered dynamo / light system, if coaxial cable is
    used it must be for some good reason, but what reason?


    Most likely the reason is psychological, not physical.

    It could be "good" in the former case, but not in the latter!

    bob prohaska

    Quoted message said:
  5. BobT said:

    In researching this, I note that the Schmidt lights are supplied
    with "heavy duty coaxial cable" to connect to the dynamo. Why
    would shielded coaxial cable be needed to connect up a hub dynamo
    and lights?

    AFAIK Schmidt looked for a cable that is UV resistant, robust,
    convenient to run and offers two times a sufficient cross section.
    The supplied coaxial cable meets that specification, standard 2 way
    cable with sufficient cross section typically is no longer round or
    pretty thick...

    --
    MfG/Best regards
    helmut springer

  6. BobT said:

    I am making plans to install lights on my new touring bike and connect them
    to a Schmidt hub dynamo.

    In researching this, I note that the Schmidt lights are supplied with
    "heavy duty coaxial cable" to connect to the dynamo. Why would shielded
    coaxial cable be needed to connect up a hub dynamo and lights?


    It is strong, wearresistant, easy to route and elegant. That it happens
    to be coaxial (which is more work to nstall) is something you have to
    take with the advantages

    --
    ---
    Marten Gerritsen

    INFOapestaartjeM-GINEERINGpuntNL
    www.m-gineering.nl

  7. BobT said:

    Back to the wire question: I assume (often a mistake) that in this
    sophisticated, German engineered dynamo / light system, if coaxial cable is
    used it must be for some good reason, but what reason?

    BobT

    I haven't looked at the schematics so this is merely speculation:

    1) one reason could be that the power regulation is done through modulating a square wave rather than controlling a DC output. If that is the case then coax might be "required" as not emit any RF interference.
    2) or the coax could simply be a nice cable with suitable electrical, mechanical and aesthetic properties...

  8. "M-gineering" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    BobT said:

    I am making plans to install lights on my new touring bike and connect
    them to a Schmidt hub dynamo.

    In researching this, I note that the Schmidt lights are supplied with
    "heavy duty coaxial cable" to connect to the dynamo. Why would shielded
    coaxial cable be needed to connect up a hub dynamo and lights?


    It is strong, wearresistant, easy to route and elegant. That it happens to
    be coaxial (which is more work to nstall) is something you have to take
    with the advantages

    --
    ---
    Marten Gerritsen

    INFOapestaartjeM-GINEERINGpuntNL
    www.m-gineering.nl

    Thank you for your response here and also for the useful information on your
    web site about lighting.

    To summarize: The coaxial cable is selected by Schmidt because of its
    mechanical/physical characteristics rather than any need for the electrical
    shielding properties of coaxial cable.

    BobT

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    BobT said:

    "Tim McNamara" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmmm. Except you're setting up more than 3W of power consumption-
    5.4W or 6.6W. You'll want to check and make sure you'll have
    enough juice to run them all- at low speeds in particular.

    I've found several descriptions saying this will work - at Peter
    White's site:

    http://www.peterwhitecycles.com/wiringinstructions.asp

    and here:

    http://www.m-gineering.nl/son12vg.htm

    The Schmidt dynamo functions as a constant current device. You
    connect the 2.4 watt primary headlight (B&M Lumotec N Plus in my
    case) in parallel with the 0.6 watt tail light (I'm using a B&M
    DToplight plus). You then connect the secondary 3 watt headlight
    (I'm using a Schimdt E6-z) in series with the other lights. With
    this setup, the dynamo produces 12 volts, 6 watts when a speed of
    about 10 m.p.h. is reached and powers all three lights
    satisfactorily. If riding continually at a slower speed, one
    switches off the secondary light because I'm told that one fully
    powered light is brighter than two under powered lights.

    I hadn't thought of that combination, but it should work. The caveat is
    that you won't be able to use the second light effectively at low
    speeds- but then at low speeds the need for lots of headlight is much
    lower so it's not a big deal.

    Quoted message said:

    Back to the wire question: I assume (often a mistake) that in this
    sophisticated, German engineered dynamo / light system, if coaxial
    cable is used it must be for some good reason, but what reason?

    My hunch is that it mainly just looks better. It's a little less
    convenient to work with.

  10. dabac said:
    BobT said:

    Back to the wire question: I assume (often a mistake) that in this
    sophisticated, German engineered dynamo / light system, if coaxial
    cable is
    used it must be for some good reason, but what reason?

    BobT

    I haven't looked at the schematics so this is merely speculation:

    1) one reason could be that the power regulation is done through
    modulating a square wave rather than controlling a DC output. If that
    is the case then coax might be "required" as not emit any RF
    interference.

    Bike generators put out AC, not DC. It's a sine wave, or pretty close.
    And, strictly speaking, it isn't power that's regulated. Current is
    regulated, and it's an inherent function of the design. As speed
    increases, AC frequency increases. The generator's inherent inductance
    works with this increasing frequency to limit output.

    I say there is no power regulation because with hub generators or (at
    least some) bottom bracket generators, you can get about six watts of
    power out by connecting two headlights in series. That's assuming your
    speed is not too low. That's what the OP was discussing. If power
    were regulated, that wouldn't be possible.

    Regarding the original question: I can't imagine any reason the coax
    would be mandatory.

    And about the wiring and switching, you may want to try this: Instead
    of just using a switch to short out one headlamp at low speed, I
    eventually installed a single pole, double thow, center off switch
    between the headlights, accessible at the handlebars. The "single
    pole" terminal goes to the conductor between the two lights. Each
    "throw" (output terminal) is used to short out one of the headlights.
    (That is, it connects to the generator-side terminal on each
    headlight.)

    The benefit here is that I can switch either headlight on or off
    independently. (I'm using it now to compare bulbs and optics in two
    lamps.) Should I blow a bulb (admittedly, very rare) I can just switch
    to the other headlight to ride home. And the center position leaves
    both lamps in the circuit, for high speed work.

    - Frank Krygowski

  11. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    And about the wiring and switching, you may want to try this: Instead
    of just using a switch to short out one headlamp at low speed, I
    eventually installed a single pole, double thow, center off switch
    between the headlights, accessible at the handlebars. The "single
    pole" terminal goes to the conductor between the two lights. Each
    "throw" (output terminal) is used to short out one of the headlights.
    (That is, it connects to the generator-side terminal on each
    headlight.)

    The benefit here is that I can switch either headlight on or off
    independently. (I'm using it now to compare bulbs and optics in two
    lamps.) Should I blow a bulb (admittedly, very rare) I can just switch
    to the other headlight to ride home. And the center position leaves
    both lamps in the circuit, for high speed work.

    - Frank Krygowski


    Does your dynamo also power a tail light and if so, how is connected in the
    setup you describe?

    BobT

  12. BobT said:

    In researching this, I note that the Schmidt lights are supplied with
    "heavy duty coaxial cable" to connect to the dynamo. Why would shielded
    coaxial cable be needed to connect up a hub dynamo and lights?

    Because a single round cable looks better than a twin wireset, and there
    are no issues with places where the cable twists and doesn't lie flat.

    That's just a guess, mind you, but other than aesthetic, no, no reason.

    Quoted message said:

    For my application (tail light and two independently switched front lights),
    I want to modify the wiring harnesses that come with the lights. I am
    wondering if it makes much difference what wire I use in this 6 volt, 3 watt
    system?

    At half an amp, you don't want to use too small a wire gauge. 22-24 AWG
    would probably be good enough. Keep in mind that while the wire to the
    rear light isn't doing anything near half an amp, that's closer to 50 mA,
    but it is also a much longer run and therefore using the same gauge for
    both runs is probably warranted.

    Go for the thickest copper over the minimum you can afford slash are
    willing to put up with on the bike.

    Jasper

  13. BobT said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    And about the wiring and switching, you may want to try this: Instead
    of just using a switch to short out one headlamp at low speed, I
    eventually installed a single pole, double thow, center off switch
    between the headlights, accessible at the handlebars. The "single
    pole" terminal goes to the conductor between the two lights. Each
    "throw" (output terminal) is used to short out one of the headlights.
    (That is, it connects to the generator-side terminal on each
    headlight.)

    The benefit here is that I can switch either headlight on or off
    independently. (I'm using it now to compare bulbs and optics in two
    lamps.) Should I blow a bulb (admittedly, very rare) I can just switch
    to the other headlight to ride home. And the center position leaves
    both lamps in the circuit, for high speed work.

    - Frank Krygowski


    Does your dynamo also power a tail light and if so, how is connected in the
    setup you describe?

    Yes, I've got a taillight, but it's switched. It's in parallel with
    the left front lamp, but a SPST switch on my handlebars can turn it
    off. (It has to be parallel to just one headlight, else the little 6V,
    0.6W bulb would blow.)

    I was curious about the relative brightness of an overdriven 2.4 watt
    bulb (i.e. with no taillight) versus a 3 watt bulb with no taillight,
    hence that setup. I find there is a noticeable rise in the left lamp's
    brightness with the taillight shut off, but the 3 watt lamp on the
    right seems still brighter.

    BTW, I've also got an LED blinkie in back (AA powered) and some pretty
    standard reflectors.

    Next step, I think, is an LED generator headlamp.

    - Frank Krygowski

  14. Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:02:00 +0100, M-gineering:

    Quoted message said:


    It is strong, wearresistant, easy to route and elegant. That it happens
    to be coaxial (which is more work to nstall) is something you have to
    take with the advantages

    There is one more advantage: The "shield wire" is the one connected to
    electrical ground at the lights. This way, if the outer isolation of the
    coaxial wire is damaged, just this grounded wire makes contact with the
    bike frame and nothing is shorted out.

    Andreas - employee at Schmidt Maschinenbau

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.