Australia and New Zealand ยท Public discussion

'Shared' path - yeah right

Started by GPLama ยท ยท Last activity ยท 31 posts ยท 2,485 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
2 December 2005
Last activity
3 December 2005
Original author
GPLama
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,485
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1โ€“20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. yet another new thread for today ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Yesterday riding home on a shared path (one with a solid white line down the
    middle), I approached two young ladies walking their dogs in the opposite
    direction. Both dogs were the fluffy uncontrollable types, so I slowed to
    an almost stop... At the last second one of the dogs runs right in front of
    me.. I had it under control knowing this was going to happen... Usually
    I'd swear lots and drone out any attempt by the owner to respond... but
    no... I politely said "well, that dog isn't very well trained"..

    w00t! I think I hit a nerve!! "SQUARK THIS IS AN OFF THE LEAD AREA SQUARK
    SQUARK"... wholly hell... since when does an off the lead area mean you have
    no responsibility for the safety of your dog and other path users? Nice man
    over.. I let her know what shape her dog would be if it happened again....

    I didn't do anything to help the cause of hatred towards cyclists, but I
    feel she put the same effort into reaffirming my hatred of obnoxious dog
    owners.. balance maintained... I blasted home setting in near PB time..
    ๐Ÿ™‚

    cheers,
    GPL

  2. GPLama said:


    w00t! I think I hit a nerve!! "SQUARK THIS IS AN OFF THE LEAD AREA SQUARK

    So what? A common 'squark' from dog walkers...
    Yes, the area the Shared path travels thru might well be an 'offlead' one however once they grace that bitumen/concrete which is signed as a shared path they are beholden(sp?) to the law (along with the $100 fine!) stating they must have their dog back on the leash.
    It's a fineable offence. Perhaps point that out to them next time you see some owner vagueing off like that. Better yet, lean over and note rover's rego number. That'll put the wind up her/him. consequences have habit of doing that...

  3. "flyingdutch" wrote in message...

    Quoted message said:


    It's a fineable offence. Perhaps point that out to them next time you
    see some owner vagueing off like that. Better yet, lean over and note
    rover's rego number. That'll put the wind up her/him. consequences have
    habit of doing that...

    That's a damn good level headed idea... you think it will be ok to pick the
    small dogs up by the collar, note the number, and fling them at the owner?

    cheers,
    GPL
    :dog thrower:

  4. GPLama said:


    That's a damn good level headed idea... you think it will be ok to pick the
    small dogs up by the collar, note the number, and fling them at the owner?

    cheers,
    GPL
    :dog thrower:

    Nah. put the lil' begggar to work! latch lead onto bars and emit a loud 'MUSH!!!' ๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„

    or place it in the 'offlead' nearby river ๐Ÿ˜„

  5. GPLama said:

    "flyingdutch" wrote in message...

    Quoted message said:


    It's a fineable offence. Perhaps point that out to them next time you
    see some owner vagueing off like that. Better yet, lean over and note
    rover's rego number. That'll put the wind up her/him. consequences have
    habit of doing that...

    That's a damn good level headed idea... you think it will be ok to pick the
    small dogs up by the collar, note the number, and fling them at the owner?

    cheers,
    GPL
    :dog thrower:

    This wouldn't have happened to be on a shared path in Kew perhaps? I find my worst offenders there... Luckily you can see them coming a mile off. I had a cycling regular I see often get knocked off due to the same sort of situation, and then attacked by the dumb-ass owners.

    Also had ludicrous encounters where I've overtaken people (not using the bell as too often that creates more problems than it solves), to be heckled with "No bell!"... The temptation to turn and give a mouthful is hard to resist, but then why waste my effort and time on no-brainers...

    (This is all the capital city trail through Kew East, and only since Spring arrived notably!!)

  6. Tell the [censored] (sorry, I mean it's owner) what a scratched ergolever
    costs. If she wants to pay for the results of her uncontrolled dog
    making you fall off...her choice.

    Donga

  7. "eddiec" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    This wouldn't have happened to be on a shared path in Kew perhaps? I
    find my worst offenders there... Luckily you can see them coming a mile
    off. I had a cycling regular I see often get knocked off due to the same
    sort of situation, and then attacked by the dumb-ass owners.

    Doncaster East... along the 'cliff one side, fence the other' section just
    east of the Blackburn Rd underpass...

    cheers,
    GPL

  8. "Donga" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    Tell the [censored] (sorry, I mean it's owner) what a scratched ergolever
    costs. If she wants to pay for the results of her uncontrolled dog
    making you fall off...her choice.

    Looks like squirrels are the answer...

    http://tinyurl.com/a2g3m

    cheers,
    GPL

  9. Disobedient dogs are like disobedient children. Injury usually tempers an unbridled spirit.

  10. We were in Centennial Park on our singles for a change when having a nice ride when we decided to stop for a moment. A woman decided with one of those fluffy uncontrolable things in tow stopped just out of range of the dog being able to reach us. First she had the dog with teeth barred going berko 10cms away from my wifes ankle and then she proceeded to do the same to me. She was horrified when I suggested that she take her out of control dog away before I used it as a football. She thought they were so cute!
    Seemed like a good idea to me.
    If my 2 rottweillers were that badly trained they would be a menace (and impossible to hold with a combined weight of over 100kgs.
    Some people think if thier dog is small they don't need to be trained.

    Just think if the dog is off the lead and causes you to have an accident, not only can they be fined but you can also sue them for damage and loss of income.

    I hate fluffy yappy dogs

    Cheers

    Geoff

  11. geoffs said:

    We were in Centennial Park on our singles for a change when having a nice ride when we decided to stop for a moment. A woman decided with one of those fluffy uncontrolable things in tow stopped just out of range of the dog being able to reach us. First she had the dog with teeth barred going berko 10cms away from my wifes ankle and then she proceeded to do the same to me. She was horrified when I suggested that she take her out of control dog away before I used it as a football. She thought they were so cute!
    Seemed like a good idea to me.
    If my 2 rottweillers were that badly trained they would be a menace (and impossible to hold with a combined weight of over 100kgs.
    Some people think if thier dog is small they don't need to be trained.

    Just think if the dog is off the lead and causes you to have an accident, not only can they be fined but you can also sue them for damage and loss of income.

    I hate fluffy yappy dogs

    Cheers

    Geoff

    I like Lama's 'Ninja-Squirrels' story ๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„

    as for 'yappy-dogs', enjoy...

    crazy lil' dawg

  12. On 2005-12-02, flyingdutch (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    'crazy lil' dawg'
    (http://www.tooshocking.com/index.php?ns=view_vid&id=493)

    Given the title, perhaps Not Safe For Work, but fortuantely, it seems
    my browser doesn't have the appropriate plugin.

    --
    TimC
    READING MICROSCOPIC DISCLAIMERS ON COUPON MAY CAUSE PAPER CUTS ON EYEBALLS.
    -- Disclaimer on Kibo's Pot Pie of Pain

  13. geoffs said:

    I hate fluffy yappy dogs

    Cheers

    Geoff


    I've heard them referred to as "air dogs" - always carried by their Mosman/Toorak middle-aged female owners, their feet never touch the ground.

    Reminds me that we have exported Rose Porteous to Melbourne - lucky Melbourne. hahahaha

    SteveA

  14. GPLama said:

    "Donga" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    Tell the [censored] (sorry, I mean it's owner) what a scratched ergolever
    costs. If she wants to pay for the results of her uncontrolled dog
    making you fall off...her choice.

    Looks like squirrels are the answer...

    http://tinyurl.com/a2g3m

    cheers,
    GPL


    my gawd..... that puts squirrels in a whole new light for me... and to think there are thousands of the buggers in Parks across the U.S, although they are the brown ones.... still...... I guess make sure they have enough "cones" or they get cranky.

  15. On 2005-12-02, MikeyOz (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:
    GPLama said:

    Looks like squirrels are the answer...

    http://tinyurl.com/a2g3m


    my gawd..... that puts squirrels in a whole new light for me...

    Did anyone see that documentary within the last few weeks, about
    animal myths? It turns out pyranas aren't quite so menacing as we all
    like to think they are.

    --
    TimC
    "Application encountered an error while failing. Error recovered
    successfully, proceeding to fail"

  16. GPLama wrote:
    ....

    Quoted message said:

    w00t! I think I hit a nerve!! "SQUARK THIS IS AN OFF THE LEAD AREA SQUARK
    SQUARK"... wholly hell... since when does an off the lead area mean you have
    no responsibility for the safety of your dog and other path users? Nice man
    over.. I let her know what shape her dog would be if it happened again....

    You know.. I came to a realisation the other day (so, I'm a little
    slow).

    Shared paths are the only place a cyclist has NO right of way. You
    have to give way to everyone; cars (entering/leaving roads), aimlessly
    wandering pedestrians, their dogs etc.. etc...

    At least on the road, there are rules that drivers generally follow,
    and I have right of way under those rules.

  17. GPLama said:

    "eddiec" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    This wouldn't have happened to be on a shared path in Kew perhaps? I
    find my worst offenders there... Luckily you can see them coming a mile
    off. I had a cycling regular I see often get knocked off due to the same
    sort of situation, and then attacked by the dumb-ass owners.

    Doncaster East... along the 'cliff one side, fence the other' section just
    east of the Blackburn Rd underpass...

    I get that there all the time. Double points for the dog if you
    collect the owner at the same time. I often remark "if I kill it, I
    get to eat it"

  18. quote='Bleve'GPLama said:

    "eddiec" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    This wouldn't have happened to be on a shared path in Kew perhaps? I
    find my worst offenders there... Luckily you can see them coming a mile
    off. I had a cycling regular I see often get knocked off due to the same
    sort of situation, and then attacked by the dumb-ass owners.

    Doncaster East... along the 'cliff one side, fence the other' section just
    east of the Blackburn Rd underpass...

    I get that there all the time. Double points for the dog if you
    collect the owner at the same time. I often remark "if I kill it, I
    get to eat it"[/QUOTE]
    Dogs. Cyclists. Little old ladies. Why am I having visions of the Triplets of Belleville?๐Ÿ™‚

  19. Duncan said:

    You know.. I came to a realisation the other day (so, I'm a little
    slow).

    Shared paths are the only place a cyclist has NO right of way. You
    have to give way to everyone; cars (entering/leaving roads), aimlessly
    wandering pedestrians, their dogs etc.. etc...

    At least on the road, there are rules that drivers generally follow,
    and I have right of way under those rules.

    Congratulations on your new knowledge. Roads are for traffic, cyclists are
    traffic. Paths are for wandering about.

    Theo

  20. "Theo Bekkers" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:


    Congratulations on your new knowledge. Roads are for traffic, cyclists are
    traffic. Paths are for wandering about.

    ----> _"Shared"_ <------

    I am not a traffic, I AM A PONY!!!!!!!11111one

    cheers,
    GPL

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users ยท 0 guests ยท0 bots ยท0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.