I have a problem. I have size 41 shoe (Lake Mx220). This holds my
foot securely in position when laced. So far so good. The width
accomodates the widest part of my foot, just behind the toes. This is
a very comfortable shoe for me over short distances (<100 miles). When
I bought most of my shoes I size for width. And apart from my ski
boots all my shoes are 7/41. All except the ski boots have excessive
toe wriggle room which is normally nice to have.
Most manufacturers claim (7 and 41) as equivalent. The problem is
that I am 6 1/2 which is often 40.5 and sometimes 40. I found a nice
table illustrating the conversion problem at a tennis shop
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/TWInt/Twint_Pages/shoe.html
Nearly all bike shoe manufacturers make half sizes. As far as I know
no british importer or shop imports half sizes. This leaves me with a
problem. I have never found a size 40 sports shoe that fits.
When I ride longer distances my toes become relaxed. As road
vibration rattles the big toe and it is gently taps. As in the
chinese water torture this eventually becomes painfull. On Saturday I
abandoned a 400km ride after just 100km because I could feel the pain
developing and was not looking forward to 15 hours of agony. I know
Bigtoeitis does not rank large on cyclist foot problems but I'm a
wimp. Most cyclists I have asked said they have never come across
this problem before. Most said their feet were completely numb after
a big ride. My feet stay alive which is mostly a good thing. I
commented on Saturday, "I need to find a less comfortable shoe."
Now it seems to me that it is important that for long distance cycling
when I might be riding over 24hours I get a shoe that fits properly
not just short term comfortable. It seems rediculous to me that
expensive shoes like cycling shoes are not available in half sizes.