General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Silicone-Coated Baking Parchment

Started by Mark Thorson · · Last activity · 7 posts · 699 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
2 February 2004
Last activity
3 February 2004
Original author
Mark Thorson
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
699
Views / 30 days
2

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Every day, new uses are found for this wonderful
    material:

    ifyoucare.comBaking%20products.htm

    Nobody is listening to Ilena's ranting and raving.

  2. Mark Thorson <[email hidden]> One of the many "SnakeOil Vigilantes" for Team Quack showed
    his ignoran

    Quoted message said:


    ifyoucare.comBaking%20products.htm

    Nobody is listening to Ilena's ranting and raving.

    LOL ... as I have never spoken out against using silicone in baking products ... your quacking about
    me is very amusing ... and shows Steve & Terror's & Grell's silly impotent Smear Campaigning against
    me continues with your help ...

    The more they lose ...the more smearing you guys do ...

    In fact ... the FDA Head carefully listened to many of the women in my group and read our Petitions
    and FAILED Inamed's approval request!

    www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

    Further ... the 3 Appeals Court Judges listened to me and granted our rehearing request ... while
    denying Quack Stevie Barrett's ...

    details of the new court opinion are here:

    www.humanticsfoundation.com/quacklibelsuit.htm

    Grell & Barrett look ridiculous ... there was not even one comment I have made about them that was
    even potenially libelous ... despite all their rantings and ravings (as well as their Team of Quack
    Flacks like you and Nana and Probert's) ...

    Thanks for a good example of Barrett & Team's filthy campaign against me.

  3. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Silicone-Coated Baking Parchment
    From: [email hidden] (Ilena)
    Date: 2/2/2004 11:47 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Mark Thorson <[email hidden]> One of the many "SnakeOil Vigilantes" for Team Quack showed
    his ignoran

    Quoted message said:


    ifyoucare.comBaking%20products.htm

    Nobody is listening to Ilena's ranting and raving.

    Mark Thorson said that?!?!

    LOLOLOL.

    Sure gald he doesn't rant and rave or repeat.

    WOW!!!

    The lackeys for Barrett will say anything.

    Poor Mark.

    Jan

  4. Mark Thorson <[email hidden]> one of the fools for Team Quack ...

    Quoted message said:


    ifyoucare.comBaking%20products.htm

    Nobody is listening to Ilena's ranting and raving.

    LOL ... as I have never spoken out against using silicone in baking products ... your quacking about
    me is very amusing ... and shows Steve & Terror's & Grell's silly impotent Smear Campaigning against
    me continues with your help ...

    The more they lose ...the more smearing you guys do ...

    In fact ... the FDA Head carefully listened to many of the women in my group and read our Petitions
    and FAILED Inamed's approval request!

    www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

    Further ... the 3 Appeals Court Judges listened to me and granted our rehearing request ... while
    denying Quack Stevie Barrett's ...

    details of the new court opinion are here:

    www.humanticsfoundation.com/quacklibelsuit.htm

    Grell & Barrett look ridiculous ... there was not even one comment I have made about them that was
    even potenially libelous ... despite all their rantings and ravings (as well as their Team of Quack
    Flacks like you and Nana and Probert's) ...

    Thanks for a good example of Barrett & Team's filthy campaign against me.

  5. [email hidden] (Ilena) wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Mark Thorson <[email hidden]> One of the many "SnakeOil Vigilantes" for Team Quack showed
    his ignoran

    OOOps... got you and Mark Lowry confused ... Barrett has so many Marks ... I couldn't keep up
    with them all.

    Thorson is NOT a card carrying Snake Oil Vigilante ... my mistake. Lowry is. Ratz and Ros and
    Andy are ...

    ratbags.comwhoarewe.htm

    www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

    He is one of the Quack Team Parrots, however, who insult and obsess about me since Barrett & Grell
    SLAPP sued me ...

    www.humanticsfoundation.com/quacklibelsuit.htm

  6. (Ilena) said:

    Thorson is NOT a card carrying Snake Oil Vigilante ... my mistake. Lowry is. Ratz and Ros and
    Andy are ...

    ratbags.comwhoarewe.htm

    This oversight has been fixed.

    Thankz for pointing out the omission, [censored].

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project ratbags.comrsoles
    The Green Light ratbags.comgreenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 ratbags.comloon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Peter Bowditch said:
    (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: Peter Bowditch

    Quoted message said:

    [censored].


    Yes, Jan, it really is bad when someone calls someone else names. Ilena would never call me
    "Ratz", and I am sure that you would never refer to anyone except by their real and acknowledged
    name. I am sure you would be horrified if, for example, someone called Dr Barrett "Bar...RAT" or
    called Mark Probert "Mark Problem".

    You would, wouldn't you? Anything else would be hypocrisy.

    Indeed. And Jan would never, ever, call anyone a "liar," either, would she?

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.