Size Matters?

Hi there.

There are several "standard" sizes of unicycle. Expressed as wheel
diameter in inches, they are:
12: Children, novelty use.
16: Children, novelty use.
20: Trials, freestyle, learning.
24: General purpose, MUni, learning.
26: MUni, commuting.
28: Commuting, road riding.
29: Fast Muni, road ridng, commuting.
36: Coker - fast big machine for those who like them.

These are generalisations.

The accepted wisdom is that learning on a 20 is easiest. Accepted
wisdom is not always right. It was once accepted wisdom that the Sun
went round the Earth, that the Earth was flat, and that riding a
unicycle was impossible.

At 6'3" you should be able to learn on a 24. (Assuming 6'3" is your
height!😉 ) A friend of mine who's 5'10" learned on a 24. At least
one person in this forum learned on a 36.

Smaller wheels are lighter and more manoeuvreable. If you want to do
hoppy droppy spinny stuff, then a good solid 20 may be best for you.
Bigger wheels are faster and roll over obstacles better. A 24 with a
very fat tyre is therefore good for MUni.

This is only my opinion, but a 20 may be easier to sell if you don't
take to unicycling. If you do take to unicycling, you will almost
certainly upgrade and end up with 2 or more unis anyway. Problem
solved!

--
Mikefule - Roland Hope School of Unicycling

The poor lack much, the greedy, everything.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

i f you have never rode a uni before, and you are SURE you want to do
fonly freestyle, I'd buy a longneck 20in. If you want a more versitle
uni (i.e. being able to ride it some distance) i would go with a 24in.

BTW- are completely giving up bike trials? what kind of bike dom you
have? I ride an Alibongo

--
DK - rude boy dreams

*^useless post^*
\"Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's, Give
unto God what is God's\"

All of us are gonna die
You could say nature's a facist
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DK's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8054
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

I'm 6'5" and I learned to ride on a 24" Torker CX. I now ride a 20"
Torker LX.

You should have no problems with a 20" and it would be better (in my
opinion..maybe?) for trials and freestyle, if that's what you want to be
doing.

I also find that people you meet are more willing to try to ride a 20"
than a 24" :p

--
burjzyntski - thejoeb

It's no good being Polish unless you prove it once a day.

"Every silver lining has a touch of gray."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
burjzyntski's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10188
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

I thought you might also like to know that the standard 400mm seatpost
is long enough to accommodate for my long legs.

--
burjzyntski - thejoeb

It's no good being Polish unless you prove it once a day.

"Every silver lining has a touch of gray."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
burjzyntski's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10188
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

You can learn to ride, and do good freestyle, on a 24" wheel. For a tall
guy like you the difference in learning will be pretty minor. 24" lends
itself to some sorts of tricks better than 20", but 20" is better for
others.

There are some who prefer larger wheels on tall riders because it looks
a lot better. Like Sem's father-in-law (and probably Sem as well; he has
only ever used 24" for performing). I used to do Freestyle on a 24" as
well.

If you're going to perform on small stages, then 20" is going to help
you out a lot (more wheel turns for any given amount of space).

--
johnfoss - More Moab Fun

John Foss, the Uni-Cyclone
"jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com

"Read the rules!" -- 'IUF Rulebook'
(http://www.unicycling.org/iuf/rulebook/) -- 'USA Rulebook'
(http://www.unicycling.org/usa/competition/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

Size DOES matter...to most women.

--
leeman180 - i should be out riding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leeman180's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8441
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

Here's another way of looking at it. You're a bicyclist, right? When I
used to do fairly serious cycling (as a tourer, not a racer) I set my
bicycle up so that the gears were as near to 10% apart as possible. On
the size of rear block that I had, that was more or less one tooth
difference between adjacent cogs.

A 24 is 4/20 bigger than a 20. That is 2/10, so a 24 is 20% bigger than
a 20. That's equivalent to about 2 gears on a touring cycle, or maybe 3
gears on a racing cycle. The difference will be noticeable, but not
life changing.

I only put it in these terms because as a bicyclist, it might make some
sense to you.

There is also the intimidation factor of a bigger wheel. However, the
extra height is only half the difference, because the distance from axle
to seat will be the same, and the distance from axle to ground is the
*radius* of the wheel. So on a 24, you will be 2 inches higher than on
a 20 - other things being equal.

And other things may not be equal. It is common to have 5 inch (125 mm)
cranks on an off the shelf 20. It is common to have 6 inch (150 mm)
cranks on an off the shelf 24. You set the seat height according to the
distance from the bottom of the pedal travel, so if the crank is an inch
longer, you have to set the seat an inch lower to be able to reach the
pedal.

So, the 24 has a 4 inch bigger wheel, but you end up with a seat height
only about 1 inch higher. That's negligible.

Then there's the control factor. A six inch crank is equal to half the
radius of a 24 inch wheel. A 5 inch crank is equal to half the radius
of a 20 inch wheel. Therefore, the leverage that you have is the same,
so you have about the same amount of control. A 24 isn't harder to
pedal than a 20.

Some people find 150 mm cranks a bit long and unwieldy. You are a
bicyclist used to (I guess) 170 mm cranks. You are also over 6 feet
tall. Therefore you should have no difficulty with 150 mm cranks.

So what this boils down to is that you would notice very little
difference between a standard 20 and a standard 24 when learning to
ride.

Where it matters later is with things like sharp turns, and idling,
where the bigger wheel is noticeably less manouvreable. It's not a huge
effect, but it's there.

Remember that new cranks cost only a small amount (on a standard uni)
and are easily swapped. The choice of tyre can make an inch or so
difference to the effective wheel size. A pedals upgrade will give you
more control, and so on. If you buy a 24, you can even buy a 20 inch
wheelset to swap into the frame, rather than buying 2 unicycles.

In short, worry less.

--
Mikefule - Roland Hope School of Unicycling

The poor lack much, the greedy, everything.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

Thanks a lot for all the speedy replies, they all helped a lot. Some
very logical things there I hadn't thought about.
It's kind of a shame there's not a big difference though, because I'm
still left with the choice of which to buy! I think I'll go with the
20", mostly for the reason that it'll be easier to shift whould
unicycling not float my boat.

But I don't think that'll be a problem. I've bought a guitar and a power
kite this month, neither of which I've ever used before (or used much
now even), I just like having material things!

Thanks again for your help, much appreciated. I'll keep you updated, and
will probably pop back occassionally.
Cheers, Leigh

--
Twilite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Twilite's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10738
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

leeman180 said:

*Size DOES matter...to most women. *

Its not the size, its just how you use it.

--
juggle508 - Street unicyclist.

If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.

---------- Joshua 1:9----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
juggle508's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6701
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054

I think that because of your height it may be better to get A 24"
because in porportion it will feel right, you have more weight muscle
and size so you will need a 24"

Also in response to whoever said 20" ones are easier to learn on, I
myself learned on a 24" one and i progressed very very quickly. And to
help you learn i suggest *not* using a tennis court to learn, I have a
screened in area at my house with several pillars and so i was forced in
the first days to learn to free ride and then when i ran out od space
after a few days of help from someone else outside my house, i started
learning to free mount quite quickly.

hope that helps
-Whim

--
Whim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whim's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10736
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/43054