UK and Europe · Public discussion

Spot the year

Started by Tony Raven · · Last activity · 6 posts · 333 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
13 June 2004
Last activity
15 June 2004
Original author
Tony Raven
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
333
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just for fun I took the graphs of head injury rates amongst cyclists in
    Western Australia and New Zealand and removed all traces of dates etc. I've
    posted them at http://www.cycling.raven-family.com/Helmet%20Graphs.jpg

    Without the hints on the original graphs, can you spot when the mandatory
    helmet law was introduced? Answers in ticks from the left on a postcard
    without cheating and looking up the originals.

    Thought it would make a good challenge for the Swampmonster to ask her to
    point it out if the opportunity ever arose.

    Tony

  2. On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 21:53:38 +0100, "Tony Raven"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Just for fun I took the graphs of head injury rates amongst cyclists in
    Western Australia and New Zealand and removed all traces of dates etc. I've
    posted them at http://www.cycling.raven-family.com/Helmet%20Graphs.jpg

    Yup. Been there, done that. The really striking thing is that the
    Australian weareing rate apparnetly went from around 30% to around 80%
    in the three years up to and including compulsion. Can you see any
    justification for 90%, 88%, 85% or 69% efficacy in that chart?

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

  3. Just zis Guy said:

    Yup. Been there, done that. The really striking thing is that the
    Australian weareing rate apparnetly went from around 30% to around 80%
    in the three years up to and including compulsion. Can you see any
    justification for 90%, 88%, 85% or 69% efficacy in that chart?

    3214%, obviously.

    James

  4. Tony Raven said:

    Just for fun I took the graphs of head injury rates amongst cyclists in
    Western Australia and New Zealand and removed all traces of dates etc. I've
    posted them at http://www.cycling.raven-family.com/Helmet%20Graphs.jpg

    Without the hints on the original graphs, can you spot when the mandatory
    helmet law was introduced? Answers in ticks from the left on a postcard
    without cheating and looking up the originals.

    Here's a spoiler for the australian graph showing the percentage of
    crashes that result in a head-injury:

    http://agbu.une.edu.au/~drobinso/ozdoc.html

    (It looks similar so I assume it's where you got your graph from, Tony?)

    The answer being that helmet compulsion was introduced 2 ticks from the
    RHS, just before pedestrian head injuries fall and cyclist head-injuries
    rise.

    AC

  5. anonymous coward said:

    http://agbu.une.edu.au/~drobinso/ozdoc.html

    Obviously those are Cook & Sheikh helmets they are wearing - the cycle
    helmets have protected the pedestrians very well indeed!

    --
    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    Victory is ours! Down with Eric the Half A Brain!

  6. Just zis Guy said:
    anonymous coward said:

    http://agbu.une.edu.au/~drobinso/ozdoc.html

    Obviously those are Cook & Sheikh helmets they are wearing - the cycle
    helmets have protected the pedestrians very well indeed!

    I think, in dedication to their cause, C&S should wear enough helmets to
    protect all of us. After all their first priority is safety and they can be
    far more certain that people will be safe that way than trust to the vagaries
    of whether individual do or don't wear helmets. ;-0

    Tony

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.