Y'know, today I got to ride it in the sunlight (so there is a shadow
of the chainring to see what's going on), and while I can't see it
jump either in front or back, I'm beginning to suspect the front.
There's a couple things in its favor, and a couple things against it.
In favor of the front, there's clear daylight between chain and
chainwheel, and under load the daylight on the bottom of the
chainwheel gets smaller. This means that the chain is slipping
on the chainwheel, maybe enough (?) to make it clear an oncoming
tooth on top. The theory then is that the general gunk and crud
kept the chain from slipping on its respective teeth and so prevented
the extra slack from appearing at the top of the chainwheel, and oiling
the thing (to get rid of visible sudden rust) broke that spell. A
dry chain is a happy chain.
Against the front, (1) the chain stays on the chainwheel it's on
rather than popping off, and (2) it skips on the smaller chainwheels
which have no wear on them at all more easily than on the large
chainwheel which is visibly worn.
It skips on the smaller rear cogs much more than the large ones,
so apparently at least the derailleur tension seems to keep it happy,
and that tension ought to make the chainwheel slippage worse rather
than better.
So I don't have a good theory.
What I'll try, for the fun of it, is weaving some string back and forth
across the chainwheel tooth gaps, so as to encourage the former daylight
to stay evenly distributed, and see if that reduces the skipping.
It only skips under load, so you can't watch it very carefully.
--
Ron Hardin
[email hidden]
On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.