Cubit wrote:
:: I rented the movie last night too. I watched it with my parents who
:: had not seen it before.
::
:: Roger Zoul's and BJ's review of a movie they HAVE NOT SEEN is
:: irresponsibly misleading those who have so much to gain in seeing it.
First off, I didn't review the film. Second, information about this film
just now released on DVD has been out for a long time and has been discussed
a lot. I've even seen stuff on TV about it. The same points could have
been arrive at in several different ways. However, McDonalds makes for a
good target, but everyone knows it, and hence it was a good way to enhance
the appeal of his [censored] film.
::
:: The movie was not about overeating. The meals were the normal meals
:: one expects to buy at McDonalds. The only time he supersized was
:: when the staff at McDonalds urged him too.
Asking the question of 'do you want that supersized' is not urging, it is a
question. The fact that he always said YES is irresponsible of him.
If the guy, a normalized guy, was eating 5000 kcal per day, then he was
overeating. If he was eating Big Mac's, supersize frieds, and milkstakes,
and dessert, he was definitely overeating. You aren't trying to say he
didn't overeat, are you? Answering yes to every question asked is a good
recipe for over eating.
One does not expect to eat every meal every day at McDonalds. It's a stupid
notion.
Why is it that we want to make others responsible for the decisions that WE
make?
One of those staff
:: members claimed that almost everyone they asked would supersize upon
:: request.
And that is proof of something? I know many people who don't supersize.
::
:: There is an amazing segment showing how and what children are eating
:: in schools these days. A Weight Loss Surgery patient goes under the
:: knife. There are Jay Leno style man-in-the-street interviews about
:: fast food, and questions about what a calorie is. We watch the
:: blood tests and results. The doctors show genuine surprise. His
:: girlfriend describes changes in his sex life. Above all that, the
:: movie is interesting.
::
:: It is true that the typical medical doctors blamed fat. However, it
:: doesn't take Einstein to see the high percentage of carbs. I wish
:: there had been some measuring of all the transfats that McDonalds
:: fed him.
It does take an Einstein in this country to even assume that carbs are a
problem. Atkins spent a lifetime to get that point across and many, many
people STILL have not accepted it.
You don't think your local supermarket isn't lined asle-by-asle with
products filled with transfats? You don't need to go to McDonalds to get
transfats, McD didn't invent them and they should not be singled out,
amongst zillions of other food establishments, for using them.
::
:: I still have the rental. Today I am going to review the extra
:: features.
I hope you enjoy being manipulated.
::
::
:: "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
:: news:[email hidden]...
::: The thing that bugs me about the film is the fact that they picked
::: on McDonalds. I just think it is totally unfair to do such a thing.
::: I can easily eat 5000 cals a day just a home, buying junk food from
::: the store and making my own meals. I can mix up all the fat and
::: sugar and low-nutrient foods I want. I can ruin my health all by
::: myself and I certainly don't need a McDonalds to do it.
:::
::: OTOH, I can make a decision to eat well to maintain/improve my
::: health. And I can choose to include several items from McDonalds
::: and other fast food joints in that plan.
:::
::: I won't be watching that film.
:::
:::
::: Tom wrote:
::::: Rented it last night. Overall, we enjoyed it. What had me
::::: wondering though, was the claims that all the food he ate at
::::: McDonald's was high fat(which it probably is), but not too much
::::: was said about the amount of carbs. All of the claims of high
::::: cholesterol and bad liver function were blamed on the fat. The
::::: nutritionist he was seeing did mention the amounts of processed
::::: carbs he was eating was not the way he should be getting his
::::: calories. Even though he was eating almost 5000 Cal a day, which
::::: was double what he was eating before, he was deficient in almost
::::: all nutrients. At the end of the show, they had 2 containers of
::::: the fat and sugar he ate, for visual effect. The fat was 12lbs.
::::: The sugar was 30lbs. They didn't appear to be measuring the
::::: overall carb content so I don't think it was included in the
::::: "sugar" container. They did mention quite a lot about the amount
::::: of teaspoons of sugar in the soft drinks, so I'm pretty sure the
::::: container was mostly from the pop he drank. I wish they would
::::: have broken down the fat, protein, carb ratios a bit better.
::::: Although I think they are wrong in saying the diet was high fat,
::::: it was a good illustration of what eating to much junk food
::::: can do to you. It was amazing to see his blood levels go from
::::: healthy to terrible in
::::: such a short time. Tom 210/180/180
:::::
::::: --
:::::
:::::
:::::
::::: Tom + Pat Gallant
::::: [email hidden]