UK and Europe · Public discussion

TdF: no spoiler, curious about HRs

Started by Velvet · · Last activity · 14 posts · 430 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
20 July 2004
Last activity
20 July 2004
Original author
Velvet
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
430
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Occasionally, eurosport show the BPM of a couple of the riders each day
    - they have a max BPM on the scale, and show the current BPM and the %
    of max they're at...

    I've noticed that quite a lot of them seem to have relatively low (to my
    mind) max HR's - possibly it's just my perception - but I was wondering
    if that max isn't their maximum but actually the point where they go
    Anaerobic/lactic?

    Anyone know for sure?

    --

    Velvet

  2. On 20/7/04 2:57 pm, in article
    [email hidden], "Velvet"

    Quoted message said:

    Occasionally, eurosport show the BPM of a couple of the riders each day
    - they have a max BPM on the scale, and show the current BPM and the %
    of max they're at...

    I've noticed that quite a lot of them seem to have relatively low (to my
    mind) max HR's - possibly it's just my perception - but I was wondering
    if that max isn't their maximum but actually the point where they go
    Anaerobic/lactic?

    Anyone know for sure?


    I'd guess that it is the aerobic limit they are treating as max.

    This does make some sort of sense, having 'normal' and 'overdrive'.

    Just out of interest, what were some of the figures like?

    ...d

  3. David Martin said:

    On 20/7/04 2:57 pm, in article
    [email hidden], "Velvet"

    Quoted message said:

    Occasionally, eurosport show the BPM of a couple of the riders each day
    - they have a max BPM on the scale, and show the current BPM and the %
    of max they're at...

    I've noticed that quite a lot of them seem to have relatively low (to my
    mind) max HR's - possibly it's just my perception - but I was wondering
    if that max isn't their maximum but actually the point where they go
    Anaerobic/lactic?

    Anyone know for sure?

    I'd guess that it is the aerobic limit they are treating as max.

    This does make some sort of sense, having 'normal' and 'overdrive'.

    Just out of interest, what were some of the figures like?

    ..d

    Can't tell you which riders, but today one of the pair they had wired up
    had a 'max' of 176, and he was pushing at 98-99% of that for quite a
    long time, in several periods. Others I've seen have been 185-190, and
    I've seen to about 90-95% of that sort of limit.

    It's quite amazing if they catch them while they're back in the peloton
    taking it a bit easy - I've seen heart rates as low as 110-120, and even
    when moving at a moderate (for them!) pace, it's been around 130-140bpm,
    sometimes up around 156bpm if they're pushing it a bit.

    Obviously it ends up a bit higher on the mountain stages when they're
    actually climbing, but even so they're a lot lower than I manage on much
    kinder hills!!

    I'll keep an eye on it a bit more if there's any interest and jot down
    some examples in the coming stages, though probably not tomorrow since
    I'm out and about working rather than working from home with the race on
    in the background ;-)

    --

    Velvet

  4. Indurains resting heart rate was 37 when he was at his peak. Mine isn't and
    never will be. You just have to be born with certain attributes.

  5. Martin 'MSeries' Newstead said:

    Indurains resting heart rate was 37 when he was at his peak. Mine isn't and
    never will be. You just have to be born with certain attributes.

    Um, yes, I do realise this :-) However, I'm still curious about whether
    the limits they're showing are the limits of aerobic capability, or
    full-out well-past-anaerobic max heart rates - I'm suspecting the
    former, but they've never actually clarified it.

    I was quite amazed to find I had a resting rate of 52, before I started
    on the recent training (ie, only done a few easy longish and no real
    shortish rides) and was still what I'd term very unfit.

    --

    Velvet

  6. Martin 'MSeries' Newstead [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    Indurains resting heart rate was 37 when he was at his peak. Mine isn't and
    never will be. You just have to be born with certain attributes.

    Mine was recently down to 47. I know some free divers who see similar
    levels while actually diving, but not just resting. That really is
    impressive. I'm surprised doctors don't keep trying to resuscitate him!

    Jon

  7. You can view the HR of various Tour riders here
    http://tdf.polar.fi/tourdefrance/heartrates.html

    I think these are true max figures but I'm prepared to be proven wrong. I'm
    30 and my max is around 185. The figures on Eurosport are just a bit higher
    than me for riders of my age (as they you would expect).

    Regards

    Paul F

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.721 / Virus Database: 477 - Release Date: 16/07/2004

  8. Paul said:

    You can view the HR of various Tour riders here
    http://tdf.polar.fi/tourdefrance/heartrates.html

    I think these are true max figures but I'm prepared to be proven wrong. I'm
    30 and my max is around 185. The figures on Eurosport are just a bit higher
    than me for riders of my age (as they you would expect).

    Regards

    Paul F

    Yebbut - I'm 33 this thurs, and my max thus far (I've not pushed it to
    the absolute limit yet afaik) is 196... I've always understood the max
    HR isn't something you can train to be higher, it's predetermined,
    though regular excising can stop the loss of one beat a year off it..
    But I'm still surprised to see theirs to be lower - maybe mine really is
    odd for my age, I don't know.

    --

    Velvet

  9. Jon Senior jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk said:

    Martin 'MSeries' Newstead [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    Indurains resting heart rate was 37 when he was at his peak. Mine isn't and
    never will be. You just have to be born with certain attributes.

    Mine was recently down to 47. I know some free divers who see similar
    levels while actually diving, but not just resting. That really is
    impressive. I'm surprised doctors don't keep trying to resuscitate him!

    I don't free dive, but when I swim, I swim underwater. If I'm not
    moving, I can manage a bit less than two minutes. During this, my heart
    rate drops to about 40-45. The lowest I've managed is 39.

    Note that resting rate, as I understand it, doesn't mean sitting
    comfortably in a chair - it means the hour or two before waking, when
    the heart beats at its very slowest.

    --
    Callas

  10. Callas [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't free dive, but when I swim, I swim underwater. If I'm not
    moving, I can manage a bit less than two minutes. During this, my heart
    rate drops to about 40-45. The lowest I've managed is 39.

    The dive reflex is a wonderful thing! My mate believes that diving to
    14m + in the North Sea and hunting lobsters with a length of copper
    piper and some steel wire is a good thing.

    Quoted message said:

    Note that resting rate, as I understand it, doesn't mean sitting
    comfortably in a chair - it means the hour or two before waking, when
    the heart beats at its very slowest.

    Not managed to record that one. I might have to wear the HRM to bed some
    time.

    Jon

  11. Callas said:
    Jon Senior jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk said:

    Martin 'MSeries' Newstead [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    Indurains resting heart rate was 37 when he was at his peak. Mine isn't and
    never will be. You just have to be born with certain attributes.

    Mine was recently down to 47. I know some free divers who see similar
    levels while actually diving, but not just resting. That really is
    impressive. I'm surprised doctors don't keep trying to resuscitate him!

    I don't free dive, but when I swim, I swim underwater. If I'm not
    moving, I can manage a bit less than two minutes. During this, my heart
    rate drops to about 40-45. The lowest I've managed is 39.

    Note that resting rate, as I understand it, doesn't mean sitting
    comfortably in a chair - it means the hour or two before waking, when
    the heart beats at its very slowest.

    --
    Callas

    Ah, slightly diff to what I thought then... I thought it was taken
    shortly after you've woken up (hopefully not with a start!) before you
    get out of bed/sit up etc.

    I did wear the HRM overnight once. Interestingly, it showed the slowest
    heart rate at around 4-5am - I seem to think I heard somewhere that
    3-4am or thereabouts is also coincidentally the most likely time for you
    to peg it from old age?

    --

    Velvet

  12. Velvet said:


    Ah, slightly diff to what I thought then... I thought it was taken
    shortly after you've woken up (hopefully not with a start!) before you
    get out of bed/sit up etc.


    Thats what I read but maybe its because some HRMs don't record anything for
    later downloading so the authors realise that it is in fact impossible to
    view the display 2-3 hours before waking ! My cheap HRMs don't have a
    record/download facility, do expensive ones ? You should average the reading
    out over 5 days too.

    Quoted message said:

    I did wear the HRM overnight once. Interestingly, it showed the
    slowest heart rate at around 4-5am -


    I read about a guy who did the same but had to set up his camcorder to film
    the display as his HRM didn't have record/download

  13. Velvet <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : the absolute limit yet afaik) is 196... I've always understood the max
    : HR isn't something you can train to be higher, it's predetermined,
    : though regular excising can stop the loss of one beat a year off it..
    : But I'm still surprised to see theirs to be lower - maybe mine really is

    Yours is within the variation. Aren't you female (he says, trying to remember
    your previous posts)? If so, women's max HR tends to be higher then mens on
    the average.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune http://www.clune.org
    "Technolibertarians make a philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  14. Arthur Clune said:

    Velvet <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : the absolute limit yet afaik) is 196... I've always understood the max
    : HR isn't something you can train to be higher, it's predetermined,
    : though regular excising can stop the loss of one beat a year off it..
    : But I'm still surprised to see theirs to be lower - maybe mine really is

    Yours is within the variation. Aren't you female (he says, trying to remember
    your previous posts)? If so, women's max HR tends to be higher then mens on
    the average.

    Arthur

    yes :-)

    --

    Velvet

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.