Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Thanks Connex

Started by vaudegiant · · Last activity · 32 posts · 2,684 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
15 November 2007
Last activity
4 January 2008
Original author
vaudegiant
Posts
32
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,684
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–32 of 32
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Nov 20, 3:49 pm, EuanB <EuanB.30b...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:
    AndrewJ said:

    I'll think you'll find that connex advise you to travel at the <front>
    of
    the train if you are doing anything unusual. For example, you have a
    pusher with a toddler, or a large object to move. This is so you are
    close to the driver and he/she can see what's happening.

    Connex prefers that cyclists get on at the back of the train because
    the front of the train's better for facilitating wheelchair access.

    When someone who's in a wheelchair needs to board a train the driver
    has to hop out to set up the ramp. Having the front carraige filled
    with fit and able bodied cyclists makes that a bit difficult.

    --
    EuanB

    Yes, of course. My mistake. Makes it hard if you've got a party with
    children/bicycles. Maybe the second from front would have been
    better.

  2. No guards on Melbourne trains? This means that Sydney is more cyclist-friendly than Melbourne for once! (about the only thing that is better).

  3. On Nov 21, 11:18 am, artemidorus <artemidorus.30d...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    No guards on Melbourne trains? This means that Sydney is more
    cyclist-friendly than Melbourne for once! (about the only thing that is
    better).

    --
    artemidorus

    No, guards went quite a while ago.

  4. vaudegiant said:


    Had an interesting bike (train) trip on Melbourne Cup week-end. My

    <snip horror story>

    As others have said the drivers mirrors are probably useless BUT there
    are 4 cameras and screens that allow the driver to see the length of
    the train. They are there specifically to stop this type of incident.
    Report the whole thing to Connex with time, date, service, station and
    platform and stand by for a canned letter in response. While you're
    waiting for said canned response you might like to report it to the
    ATSB ( http://www.atsb.gov.au/ )

    <gloat> Of course it never woulda happened in Moe where I now live and
    commute to Melb from - we have actual station staff from first train to
    last...:-) </gloat>

    --

    Humbug

    Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 37th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173

  5. On 2007-11-25, humbug (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    <gloat> Of course it never woulda happened in Moe where I now live and
    commute to Melb from - we have actual station staff from first train to
    last...:-) </gloat>

    Yeah, but you get to live in Moe, so it's a fair compromise 🙂

    --
    TimC
    I can say that eating a raw, immature habañero pepper is nothing so
    mild as tasting a meteorite. -- Mike Andrews in ASR

  6. quote='humbug'vaudegiant said:


    Had an interesting bike (train) trip on Melbourne Cup week-end. My

    <snip horror story>

    As others have said the drivers mirrors are probably useless BUT there
    are 4 cameras and screens that allow the driver to see the length of
    the train. They are there specifically to stop this type of incident.
    Report the whole thing to Connex with time, date, service, station and
    platform and stand by for a canned letter in response. While you're
    waiting for said canned response you might like to report it to the
    ATSB ( http://www.atsb.gov.au/ )

    <gloat> Of course it never woulda happened in Moe where I now live and
    commute to Melb from - we have actual station staff from first train to
    last...:-) </gloat>

    --

    Humbug

    Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 37th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173[/QUOTE]

    Well I got a very happy christmas letter from connex. Seems that they tried to contact us (no really, they did) but for some reason we failed to answer any of the phone numbers we supplied. Their letter, to paraphrase, says that

    1/. People shouldn't try to get off trains when the doors are closing. I'll try to remember to tell my kids that the next time they should just stay on the train and enjoy the ride to Epping...alone.
    2/. Once the driver activates the door-close mechanism, he/she has other "SAFETY" issues to worry about. Of course I understand that checking for potential obstacles on the tracks such as cows, cars or space junk is much more critical than ensuring that the a paying passenger who might be trapped in the door of a train has managed to clear themself.
    3/. Their CCTV is wiped clean after 7 days, and because our written complaint didn't reach them in time, they have wiped the footage. This, I admit, is perfectly understandable. I often tape over programs that I haven't yet watched. Even one's that are really important. Connex received 2 verbal complaints minutes after the incident. The CCTV footage should have been examined or quarantined.
    4/. Basically it was our fault. I infer this from the fact that there is nothing evening closely approximating an apology in the letter, and they state that thier systems are such that it's not their fault so it must be...um.....well ours really!
    5/, Connex does, however, regret the "inconvenience" that this "issue" has caused........yes, don't you hate it how those life and limb threatening incidents can be such an inconvenience.
    6/. Connex is looking forward to "restoring our confidence" in them, the next time we travel with them. Well, that certainly won't be in the near future as Connex bans peak hour travel with bikes (not that I travel on trains much with my bike, but sometimes...)

    .....WTF is going on in this city.....bikes banned on peak hour city and V-line services.....cross city tunnels....and then. Late on Sunday night I attempted to catch the last train out of city with bike ( I had been at work all day and was due back in a 7), Because Connex runs very short trains at these times, the train was packed (more so than on any peak hour service). Even without a bike I would have been lucky to get on. Suffice to say I rode home at midnight, and have sent a letter to Connex asking for a refund on my $2.90 Sunday saver ticket..

    Hi Ho, Hi Ho , it's off to the Ombudsman I go

    Sorry for the rant

    pat

  7. Ahh, good old Moe Town.

    Ridden up Coach Road lately?

    "vaudegiant" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    humbug said:
    vaudegiant said:


    Had an interesting bike (train) trip on Melbourne Cup week-end. My

    <snip horror story>

    As others have said the drivers mirrors are probably useless BUT there
    are 4 cameras and screens that allow the driver to see the length of
    the train. They are there specifically to stop this type of incident.
    Report the whole thing to Connex with time, date, service, station and
    platform and stand by for a canned letter in response. While you're
    waiting for said canned response you might like to report it to the
    ATSB ( http://www.atsb.gov.au/ )

    <gloat> Of course it never woulda happened in Moe where I now live and
    commute to Melb from - we have actual station staff from first train
    to
    last...:-) </gloat>

    --

    Humbug

    Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 37th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD
    3173

    Well I got a very happy christmas letter from connex. Seems that they
    tried to contact us (no really, they did) but for some reason we failed
    to answer any of the phone numbers we supplied. Their letter, to
    paraphrase, says that

    1/. People shouldn't try to get off trains when the doors are closing.
    I'll try to remember to tell my kids that the next time they should just
    stay on the train and enjoy the ride to Epping...alone.
    2/. Once the driver activates the door-close mechanism, he/she has
    other "SAFETY" issues to worry about. Of course I understand that
    checking for potential obstacles on the tracks such as cows, cars or
    space junk is much more critical than ensuring that the a paying
    passenger who might be trapped in the door of a train has managed to
    clear themself.
    3/. Their CCTV is wiped clean after 7 days, and because our written
    complaint didn't reach them in time, they have wiped the footage. This,
    I admit, is perfectly understandable. I often tape over programs that I
    haven't yet watched. Even one's that are really important. Connex
    received 2 verbal complaints minutes after the incident. The CCTV
    footage should have been examined or quarantined.
    4/. Basically it was our fault. I infer this from the fact that there
    is nothing evening closely approximating an apology in the letter, and
    they state that thier systems are such that it's not their fault so it
    must be...um.....well ours really!
    5/, Connex does, however, regret the "inconvenience" that this "issue"
    has caused........yes, don't you hate it how those life and limb
    threatening incidents can be such an inconvenience.
    6/. Connex is looking forward to "restoring our confidence" in them,
    the next time we travel with them. Well, that certainly won't be in the
    near future as Connex bans peak hour travel with bikes (not that I
    travel on trains much with my bike, but sometimes...)

    ....WTF is going on in this city.....bikes banned on peak hour city
    and V-line services.....cross city tunnels....and then. Late on Sunday
    night I attempted to catch the last train out of city with bike ( I had
    been at work all day and was due back in a 7), Because Connex runs very
    short trains at these times, the train was packed (more so than on any
    peak hour service). Even without a bike I would have been lucky to get
    on. Suffice to say I rode home at midnight, and have sent a letter to
    Connex asking for a refund on my $2.90 Sunday saver ticket..

    Hi Ho, Hi Ho , it's off to the Ombudsman I go

    Sorry for the rant

    pat

    --
    vaudegiant

  8. Paul Yates said:

    Ahh, good old Moe Town.

    Ridden up Coach Road lately?

    Yep - last weekend AND I hurtled down it too...:-)

    --

    Humbug

    Today is Sweetmorn, the 69th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173

  9. quote='humbug'Paul Yates said:

    Ahh, good old Moe Town.
    Ridden up Coach Road lately?


    Yep - last weekend AND I hurtled down it too...:-)
    [/QUOTE]

    Ah, I think you'll find that Coach Rd is in Newborough not Moe. Pretty awesome looking hill. I've often thought that a loop arround Haunted Hills Rd, up past the tip / cemetery, down via Coach Rd and Back across Monash Rd would be a good workout.

    My wife's family are down there (a number in the cemetery) but I've never had my bike down there.

    RoryW

  10. Rory Williams said:


    humbug said:
    Paul Yates said:

    Ahh, good old Moe Town.
    Ridden up Coach Road lately?


    Yep - last weekend AND I hurtled down it too...:-)

    Ah, I think you'll find that Coach Rd is in Newborough not Moe.

    You're right, of course.

    Quoted message said:

    Pretty awesome looking hill. I've often thought that a loop arround
    Haunted Hills Rd, up past the tip / cemetery, down via Coach Rd and
    Back across Monash Rd would be a good workout.

    Doing it that way is a pretty nice ride - the other way means going up
    Coach Rd which isn't so nice - it's bloody STEEP in parts...:-)

    Quoted message said:


    My wife's family are down there (a number in the cemetery) but I've
    never had my bike down there.

    RoryW

    --

    Humbug

    Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 72nd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173

  11. vaudegiant said:

    Well I got a very happy christmas letter from connex. Seems that they tried to contact us (no really, they did) but for some reason we failed to answer any of the phone numbers we supplied. Their letter, to paraphrase, says that

    1/. People shouldn't try to get off trains when the doors are closing. I'll try to remember to tell my kids that the next time they should just stay on the train and enjoy the ride to Epping...alone.
    2/. Once the driver activates the door-close mechanism, he/she has other "SAFETY" issues to worry about. Of course I understand that checking for potential obstacles on the tracks such as cows, cars or space junk is much more critical than ensuring that the a paying passenger who might be trapped in the door of a train has managed to clear themself.
    3/. Their CCTV is wiped clean after 7 days, and because our written complaint didn't reach them in time, they have wiped the footage. This, I admit, is perfectly understandable. I often tape over programs that I haven't yet watched. Even one's that are really important. Connex received 2 verbal complaints minutes after the incident. The CCTV footage should have been examined or quarantined.
    4/. Basically it was our fault. I infer this from the fact that there is nothing evening closely approximating an apology in the letter, and they state that thier systems are such that it's not their fault so it must be...um.....well ours really!
    5/, Connex does, however, regret the "inconvenience" that this "issue" has caused........yes, don't you hate it how those life and limb threatening incidents can be such an inconvenience.
    6/. Connex is looking forward to "restoring our confidence" in them, the next time we travel with them. Well, that certainly won't be in the near future as Connex bans peak hour travel with bikes (not that I travel on trains much with my bike, but sometimes...)

    .....WTF is going on in this city.....bikes banned on peak hour city and V-line services.....cross city tunnels....and then. Late on Sunday night I attempted to catch the last train out of city with bike ( I had been at work all day and was due back in a 7), Because Connex runs very short trains at these times, the train was packed (more so than on any peak hour service). Even without a bike I would have been lucky to get on. Suffice to say I rode home at midnight, and have sent a letter to Connex asking for a refund on my $2.90 Sunday saver ticket..

    Hi Ho, Hi Ho , it's off to the Ombudsman I go

    Sorry for the rant

    pat

    After their quite pathetic letter, I have arranged to meet the Connex Customer Feedback Manager and the Train Services Manager. They wanted to meet at Flinders street and catch a train to Southern Cross with me so we could re-enact. I said that didn't want to dragg the kids out of school to load up on the train and go through it all again. I also pointed out that as we had arranged to meet early in the morning, and as I use a bike to get around, I would be unable to make it to this meeting because of the new regulations banning bikes on peak hour services. The person I spoke to took this point with a distinct lack of humour.
    Is anyone on this forum interested in acting as an impartial observer at this meeting? It is at 9am February 4th, at Connex's Spring St(city) address

    regards,

    Pat

  12. vaudegiant said:

    The person I spoke to took this point with a distinct lack of humour.
    Is anyone on this forum interested in acting as an impartial observer at this meeting? It is at 9am February 4th, at Connex's Spring St(city) address

    That's a Monday? If there's no other takers I'll front up. Will promise to be nice, polite and remember to nod & smile.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.